Bethina Stein, Natashi Pilon, Demetrius Lira-Martins, Lucy Rowland, Rafael S. Oliveira
{"title":"自然再生恢复塞拉多开放生态系统潜力的见解","authors":"Bethina Stein, Natashi Pilon, Demetrius Lira-Martins, Lucy Rowland, Rafael S. Oliveira","doi":"10.1111/aec.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Natural regeneration in tropical open ecosystems has proved to be an effective mechanism for recovering degraded areas when considering the woody vegetation layer. However, little is known about the potential of the ground layer to recover after anthropogenic disturbances. Here, we aim to deepen the current understanding of community assembly in tropical open ecosystems by studying the natural regeneration potential in the Cerrado, with a focus on the ground layer. By inducing disturbance in conserved and degraded <i>Cerrado</i> grasslands, we tested the hypothesis that typical (native) Cerrado species colonise the disturbed patches primarily through vegetative propagation rather than by seed germination. Therefore, the vegetation would resemble the surrounding area instead of forming a novel species assembly. We induced disturbance by creating small gaps and monitored species colonisation strategies under both conditions. Non-native species dominated the degraded site, whereas the conserved site—an old-growth grassland—was dominated by native species. After 18 months (two reproductive seasons after the gaps opening), few native species colonised the degraded area, despite the removal of the non-native species in the gaps and the proximity to the conserved vegetation. Only exotic and ruderal species colonised the gaps in the degraded area, primarily through seed germination. Conversely, in the conserved area, the most common regeneration strategies were resprouting from deep and lateral underground structures (bud-banks) and stolon propagation. Therefore, we provide evidence that natural regeneration is dominated by vegetative propagation and resprouting in the Cerrado, with limited scope for native plants to colonise, even over short distances. Without a viable belowground bud-bank, restoring the Cerrado open ecosystems requires active techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights on the Potential of Natural Regeneration to Restore Cerrado Open Ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Bethina Stein, Natashi Pilon, Demetrius Lira-Martins, Lucy Rowland, Rafael S. Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Natural regeneration in tropical open ecosystems has proved to be an effective mechanism for recovering degraded areas when considering the woody vegetation layer. However, little is known about the potential of the ground layer to recover after anthropogenic disturbances. Here, we aim to deepen the current understanding of community assembly in tropical open ecosystems by studying the natural regeneration potential in the Cerrado, with a focus on the ground layer. By inducing disturbance in conserved and degraded <i>Cerrado</i> grasslands, we tested the hypothesis that typical (native) Cerrado species colonise the disturbed patches primarily through vegetative propagation rather than by seed germination. Therefore, the vegetation would resemble the surrounding area instead of forming a novel species assembly. We induced disturbance by creating small gaps and monitored species colonisation strategies under both conditions. Non-native species dominated the degraded site, whereas the conserved site—an old-growth grassland—was dominated by native species. After 18 months (two reproductive seasons after the gaps opening), few native species colonised the degraded area, despite the removal of the non-native species in the gaps and the proximity to the conserved vegetation. Only exotic and ruderal species colonised the gaps in the degraded area, primarily through seed germination. Conversely, in the conserved area, the most common regeneration strategies were resprouting from deep and lateral underground structures (bud-banks) and stolon propagation. Therefore, we provide evidence that natural regeneration is dominated by vegetative propagation and resprouting in the Cerrado, with limited scope for native plants to colonise, even over short distances. Without a viable belowground bud-bank, restoring the Cerrado open ecosystems requires active techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"50 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70113\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights on the Potential of Natural Regeneration to Restore Cerrado Open Ecosystems
Natural regeneration in tropical open ecosystems has proved to be an effective mechanism for recovering degraded areas when considering the woody vegetation layer. However, little is known about the potential of the ground layer to recover after anthropogenic disturbances. Here, we aim to deepen the current understanding of community assembly in tropical open ecosystems by studying the natural regeneration potential in the Cerrado, with a focus on the ground layer. By inducing disturbance in conserved and degraded Cerrado grasslands, we tested the hypothesis that typical (native) Cerrado species colonise the disturbed patches primarily through vegetative propagation rather than by seed germination. Therefore, the vegetation would resemble the surrounding area instead of forming a novel species assembly. We induced disturbance by creating small gaps and monitored species colonisation strategies under both conditions. Non-native species dominated the degraded site, whereas the conserved site—an old-growth grassland—was dominated by native species. After 18 months (two reproductive seasons after the gaps opening), few native species colonised the degraded area, despite the removal of the non-native species in the gaps and the proximity to the conserved vegetation. Only exotic and ruderal species colonised the gaps in the degraded area, primarily through seed germination. Conversely, in the conserved area, the most common regeneration strategies were resprouting from deep and lateral underground structures (bud-banks) and stolon propagation. Therefore, we provide evidence that natural regeneration is dominated by vegetative propagation and resprouting in the Cerrado, with limited scope for native plants to colonise, even over short distances. Without a viable belowground bud-bank, restoring the Cerrado open ecosystems requires active techniques.
期刊介绍:
Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere.
Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region.
Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.