机器人辅助左心室心外膜铅置入术在既往胸骨切开患者中的应用

Aaron Kleinertz PA-C , Benjamin Seadler MD , Hannah Holland MD , Mami Sow MD , Ali Syed MS , James Oujiri MD , G. Hossein Almassi MD , Stefano Schena MD, PhD , Mario Gasparri MD
{"title":"机器人辅助左心室心外膜铅置入术在既往胸骨切开患者中的应用","authors":"Aaron Kleinertz PA-C ,&nbsp;Benjamin Seadler MD ,&nbsp;Hannah Holland MD ,&nbsp;Mami Sow MD ,&nbsp;Ali Syed MS ,&nbsp;James Oujiri MD ,&nbsp;G. Hossein Almassi MD ,&nbsp;Stefano Schena MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mario Gasparri MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves activity tolerance and slows decline in chronic heart failure patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Traditionally, biventricular lead-based pacing devices or defibrillators are placed intravenously, although some patients require surgical epicardial LV lead placement due to vascular anatomic abnormalities, endocardial fibrosis, or high risk for bacteremia. In patients with prior sternotomy, epicardial lead placement through a thoracotomy, despite a comparatively larger incisional burden, is often preferred over thoracoscopy given the presence of dense adhesions. Approaches that minimize chest wall dissection, however, may allow more patients to safely undergo CRT. This study describes our experience with robotic-assisted LV lead placement in patients with a prior sternotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with a prior sternotomy referred for surgical epicardial lead placement between January 2018 and July 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 6 patients with a mean age of 75 years. All leads were placed successfully with a robotic-assisted approach. One patient required conversion to thoracotomy due to significant mediastinal adipose tissue burden. The median length of stay was 2 days. Mortality at 30 days was 0%. One patient sustained unilateral phrenic nerve injury, and a wound infection developed in 1 patient that required subsequent CRT device explant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Robotic LV lead placement is feasible in patients with prior sternotomy. Despite significant comorbidities, lengths of stay and perioperative complications were acceptable. Patients with relative contraindication to epicardial LV lead placement, such as those with a prior sternotomy, may benefit from a robotic-assisted approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 740-745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic-Assisted Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead Placement in Patients With Prior Sternotomy\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Kleinertz PA-C ,&nbsp;Benjamin Seadler MD ,&nbsp;Hannah Holland MD ,&nbsp;Mami Sow MD ,&nbsp;Ali Syed MS ,&nbsp;James Oujiri MD ,&nbsp;G. Hossein Almassi MD ,&nbsp;Stefano Schena MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mario Gasparri MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2025.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves activity tolerance and slows decline in chronic heart failure patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Traditionally, biventricular lead-based pacing devices or defibrillators are placed intravenously, although some patients require surgical epicardial LV lead placement due to vascular anatomic abnormalities, endocardial fibrosis, or high risk for bacteremia. In patients with prior sternotomy, epicardial lead placement through a thoracotomy, despite a comparatively larger incisional burden, is often preferred over thoracoscopy given the presence of dense adhesions. Approaches that minimize chest wall dissection, however, may allow more patients to safely undergo CRT. This study describes our experience with robotic-assisted LV lead placement in patients with a prior sternotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with a prior sternotomy referred for surgical epicardial lead placement between January 2018 and July 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 6 patients with a mean age of 75 years. All leads were placed successfully with a robotic-assisted approach. One patient required conversion to thoracotomy due to significant mediastinal adipose tissue burden. The median length of stay was 2 days. Mortality at 30 days was 0%. One patient sustained unilateral phrenic nerve injury, and a wound infection developed in 1 patient that required subsequent CRT device explant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Robotic LV lead placement is feasible in patients with prior sternotomy. Despite significant comorbidities, lengths of stay and perioperative complications were acceptable. Patients with relative contraindication to epicardial LV lead placement, such as those with a prior sternotomy, may benefit from a robotic-assisted approach.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 740-745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993125001159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993125001159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)可改善伴有左心室功能障碍的慢性心力衰竭患者的活动耐受性并减缓其衰退。传统上,双心室导联起搏装置或除颤器是静脉内放置的,尽管由于血管解剖异常、心内膜纤维化或菌血症高风险,一些患者需要手术放置心外膜左室导联。对于既往胸骨切开的患者,尽管切口负担相对较大,但由于存在致密粘连,通过开胸放置心外膜铅通常比胸腔镜更可取。然而,尽量减少胸壁剥离的方法可能允许更多的患者安全地接受CRT。本研究描述了我们在胸骨切开术患者中机器人辅助左室导联放置的经验。方法对2018年1月至2023年7月期间连续行胸骨切开术心外膜置铅手术的患者进行单机构回顾性分析。结果本组患者6例,平均年龄75岁。通过机器人辅助的方法,所有的引线都被成功放置。一名患者由于严重的纵隔脂肪组织负担需要转开胸手术。中位住院时间为2天。30天死亡率为0%。1例患者单侧膈神经损伤,1例患者出现伤口感染,需植入CRT装置。结论机器人左室导联置入术对既往胸骨切开术患者是可行的。尽管有明显的合并症,但住院时间和围手术期并发症是可以接受的。对心外膜左室导联置入术有相对禁忌症的患者,如既往胸骨切开术的患者,可以从机器人辅助入路中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic-Assisted Left Ventricular Epicardial Lead Placement in Patients With Prior Sternotomy

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves activity tolerance and slows decline in chronic heart failure patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Traditionally, biventricular lead-based pacing devices or defibrillators are placed intravenously, although some patients require surgical epicardial LV lead placement due to vascular anatomic abnormalities, endocardial fibrosis, or high risk for bacteremia. In patients with prior sternotomy, epicardial lead placement through a thoracotomy, despite a comparatively larger incisional burden, is often preferred over thoracoscopy given the presence of dense adhesions. Approaches that minimize chest wall dissection, however, may allow more patients to safely undergo CRT. This study describes our experience with robotic-assisted LV lead placement in patients with a prior sternotomy.

Methods

A single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with a prior sternotomy referred for surgical epicardial lead placement between January 2018 and July 2023.

Results

The analysis included 6 patients with a mean age of 75 years. All leads were placed successfully with a robotic-assisted approach. One patient required conversion to thoracotomy due to significant mediastinal adipose tissue burden. The median length of stay was 2 days. Mortality at 30 days was 0%. One patient sustained unilateral phrenic nerve injury, and a wound infection developed in 1 patient that required subsequent CRT device explant.

Conclusions

Robotic LV lead placement is feasible in patients with prior sternotomy. Despite significant comorbidities, lengths of stay and perioperative complications were acceptable. Patients with relative contraindication to epicardial LV lead placement, such as those with a prior sternotomy, may benefit from a robotic-assisted approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信