保留通路:小儿心脏外科左上腔静脉管理策略

Chen Chia Wang BSc , Harrison S. Stuart BA , David P. Bichell MD , Karla Christian MD
{"title":"保留通路:小儿心脏外科左上腔静脉管理策略","authors":"Chen Chia Wang BSc ,&nbsp;Harrison S. Stuart BA ,&nbsp;David P. Bichell MD ,&nbsp;Karla Christian MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC) is a common congenital anomaly requiring operative management when it causes significant right-to-left shunting or during heart transplantation. Comparative patency of various LSVC repatriation methods to the right side of the heart has not been systematically studied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical management of LSVC from 2013 to 2023. Patients were grouped on the basis of the LSVC to right atrium path: coronary sinus (CS) group with LSVC-CS anastomosis; systemic vein (SV) group with LSVC drainage through donor superior vena cava, right atrial appendage, or innominate vein; or atrial baffle (AB) group. Our primary objective is LSVC patency rate in each group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two patients with a median age of 27 months met inclusion criteria; 4 patients were in the CS group, 9 in the SV group, and 9 in the AB group. At the time of collection, 3 (75%) patients in the CS group, 3 (33%) in the SV group, and 9 (100%) in the AB group showed LSVC patency. All patients demonstrating patency in CS and SV groups were older than 2 years, whereas all patients with occlusion (except for a 35-year-old patient) were younger than 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Of the methods redirecting LSVC to the right atrium, patency may be best preserved with an undistorted LSVC reunited with a retained CS or redirected by an intracardiac baffle compared with methods that displace the LSVC. Older patients with higher weight may have better patency rates with LSVC reconstruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 651-656"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preserving Pathways: Strategies for Left Superior Vena Cava Management in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Chen Chia Wang BSc ,&nbsp;Harrison S. Stuart BA ,&nbsp;David P. Bichell MD ,&nbsp;Karla Christian MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2025.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC) is a common congenital anomaly requiring operative management when it causes significant right-to-left shunting or during heart transplantation. Comparative patency of various LSVC repatriation methods to the right side of the heart has not been systematically studied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical management of LSVC from 2013 to 2023. Patients were grouped on the basis of the LSVC to right atrium path: coronary sinus (CS) group with LSVC-CS anastomosis; systemic vein (SV) group with LSVC drainage through donor superior vena cava, right atrial appendage, or innominate vein; or atrial baffle (AB) group. Our primary objective is LSVC patency rate in each group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two patients with a median age of 27 months met inclusion criteria; 4 patients were in the CS group, 9 in the SV group, and 9 in the AB group. At the time of collection, 3 (75%) patients in the CS group, 3 (33%) in the SV group, and 9 (100%) in the AB group showed LSVC patency. All patients demonstrating patency in CS and SV groups were older than 2 years, whereas all patients with occlusion (except for a 35-year-old patient) were younger than 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Of the methods redirecting LSVC to the right atrium, patency may be best preserved with an undistorted LSVC reunited with a retained CS or redirected by an intracardiac baffle compared with methods that displace the LSVC. Older patients with higher weight may have better patency rates with LSVC reconstruction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 651-656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993125001068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993125001068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续性左上腔静脉(LSVC)是一种常见的先天性异常,当它引起明显的右至左分流或心脏移植时需要手术治疗。目前还没有系统的研究比较各种左室静脉血管回流到右侧心脏的通畅程度。方法对2013年至2023年接受手术治疗的LSVC患者进行单机构回顾性分析。根据LSVC至右心房路径分组:冠脉窦(CS)组LSVC-CS吻合;全身静脉组经供体上腔静脉、右心房附件或无名静脉引流LSVC;或心房挡板(AB)组。我们的主要目标是每组LSVC的通畅率。结果22例患者符合纳入标准,中位年龄27个月;CS组4例,SV组9例,AB组9例。采集时,CS组3例(75%),SV组3例(33%),AB组9例(100%)LSVC通畅。CS组和SV组所有显示通畅的患者年龄均大于2岁,而所有出现闭塞的患者(除了一名35岁的患者)年龄均小于2岁。结论将LSVC重定向到右心房的方法中,与LSVC移位的方法相比,将未变形的LSVC与保留的LSVC重新结合或通过心内折流板重定向可以更好地保持通畅。体重较高的老年患者进行下腔静脉重建可能有更好的通畅率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preserving Pathways: Strategies for Left Superior Vena Cava Management in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

Background

Persistent left superior vena cava (LSVC) is a common congenital anomaly requiring operative management when it causes significant right-to-left shunting or during heart transplantation. Comparative patency of various LSVC repatriation methods to the right side of the heart has not been systematically studied.

Methods

This is a single-institution, retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical management of LSVC from 2013 to 2023. Patients were grouped on the basis of the LSVC to right atrium path: coronary sinus (CS) group with LSVC-CS anastomosis; systemic vein (SV) group with LSVC drainage through donor superior vena cava, right atrial appendage, or innominate vein; or atrial baffle (AB) group. Our primary objective is LSVC patency rate in each group.

Results

Twenty-two patients with a median age of 27 months met inclusion criteria; 4 patients were in the CS group, 9 in the SV group, and 9 in the AB group. At the time of collection, 3 (75%) patients in the CS group, 3 (33%) in the SV group, and 9 (100%) in the AB group showed LSVC patency. All patients demonstrating patency in CS and SV groups were older than 2 years, whereas all patients with occlusion (except for a 35-year-old patient) were younger than 2 years.

Conclusions

Of the methods redirecting LSVC to the right atrium, patency may be best preserved with an undistorted LSVC reunited with a retained CS or redirected by an intracardiac baffle compared with methods that displace the LSVC. Older patients with higher weight may have better patency rates with LSVC reconstruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信