自适应用户界面的用户体验:比较性能和首选项

IF 4.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Daniel Gaspar-Figueiredo , Jean Vanderdonckt , Silvia Abrahão , Emilio Insfran
{"title":"自适应用户界面的用户体验:比较性能和首选项","authors":"Daniel Gaspar-Figueiredo ,&nbsp;Jean Vanderdonckt ,&nbsp;Silvia Abrahão ,&nbsp;Emilio Insfran","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive user interfaces dynamically change their content, presentation, and behavior to optimize the user experience, which has been primarily evaluated using classic usability measures but to a lesser extent by using neurological measures. While the perceived preference of specific user interface elements, such as graphical adaptive menus, has already been studied, no consensus exists regarding their performance and how to substitute a static menu with an adaptive one. To gain insights into how graphical adaptive menus could influence the user experience and to identify any correlation between users’ performance and their preferences, we conducted an experiment in which forty participants used twenty graphical adaptive menus while their brain activity was captured by employing electroencephalography to derive four measures (<em>i.e.</em>, cognitive load, engagement, attraction, and memorization). User performance was measured using task completion time, specifically the time to select menu items. Statistical analysis suggested which graphical adaptive menus were significantly better or worse than the static menu, our baseline. These results are used as the basis to suggest implications for software developers and researchers to design more effective adaptive user interfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 112598"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User experience with adaptive user interfaces: Comparing performance and preferences\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Gaspar-Figueiredo ,&nbsp;Jean Vanderdonckt ,&nbsp;Silvia Abrahão ,&nbsp;Emilio Insfran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Adaptive user interfaces dynamically change their content, presentation, and behavior to optimize the user experience, which has been primarily evaluated using classic usability measures but to a lesser extent by using neurological measures. While the perceived preference of specific user interface elements, such as graphical adaptive menus, has already been studied, no consensus exists regarding their performance and how to substitute a static menu with an adaptive one. To gain insights into how graphical adaptive menus could influence the user experience and to identify any correlation between users’ performance and their preferences, we conducted an experiment in which forty participants used twenty graphical adaptive menus while their brain activity was captured by employing electroencephalography to derive four measures (<em>i.e.</em>, cognitive load, engagement, attraction, and memorization). User performance was measured using task completion time, specifically the time to select menu items. Statistical analysis suggested which graphical adaptive menus were significantly better or worse than the static menu, our baseline. These results are used as the basis to suggest implications for software developers and researchers to design more effective adaptive user interfaces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"231 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225002675\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225002675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自适应用户界面动态地改变其内容、表示和行为以优化用户体验,这主要是使用经典的可用性度量来评估的,但在较小程度上使用神经学度量。虽然对特定用户界面元素(如图形自适应菜单)的感知偏好已经进行了研究,但关于它们的性能以及如何用自适应菜单替代静态菜单,还没有达成共识。为了深入了解图形自适应菜单如何影响用户体验,并确定用户表现与其偏好之间的任何相关性,我们进行了一项实验,其中40名参与者使用20个图形自适应菜单,同时通过脑电图捕捉他们的大脑活动,得出四项测量(即认知负荷,参与度,吸引力和记忆)。用户的表现是用任务完成时间来衡量的,特别是选择菜单项的时间。统计分析表明,哪些图形化自适应菜单明显优于或劣于静态菜单,这是我们的基线。这些结果被用作软件开发人员和研究人员设计更有效的自适应用户界面的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User experience with adaptive user interfaces: Comparing performance and preferences
Adaptive user interfaces dynamically change their content, presentation, and behavior to optimize the user experience, which has been primarily evaluated using classic usability measures but to a lesser extent by using neurological measures. While the perceived preference of specific user interface elements, such as graphical adaptive menus, has already been studied, no consensus exists regarding their performance and how to substitute a static menu with an adaptive one. To gain insights into how graphical adaptive menus could influence the user experience and to identify any correlation between users’ performance and their preferences, we conducted an experiment in which forty participants used twenty graphical adaptive menus while their brain activity was captured by employing electroencephalography to derive four measures (i.e., cognitive load, engagement, attraction, and memorization). User performance was measured using task completion time, specifically the time to select menu items. Statistical analysis suggested which graphical adaptive menus were significantly better or worse than the static menu, our baseline. These results are used as the basis to suggest implications for software developers and researchers to design more effective adaptive user interfaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信