Daniel Gaspar-Figueiredo , Jean Vanderdonckt , Silvia Abrahão , Emilio Insfran
{"title":"自适应用户界面的用户体验:比较性能和首选项","authors":"Daniel Gaspar-Figueiredo , Jean Vanderdonckt , Silvia Abrahão , Emilio Insfran","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adaptive user interfaces dynamically change their content, presentation, and behavior to optimize the user experience, which has been primarily evaluated using classic usability measures but to a lesser extent by using neurological measures. While the perceived preference of specific user interface elements, such as graphical adaptive menus, has already been studied, no consensus exists regarding their performance and how to substitute a static menu with an adaptive one. To gain insights into how graphical adaptive menus could influence the user experience and to identify any correlation between users’ performance and their preferences, we conducted an experiment in which forty participants used twenty graphical adaptive menus while their brain activity was captured by employing electroencephalography to derive four measures (<em>i.e.</em>, cognitive load, engagement, attraction, and memorization). User performance was measured using task completion time, specifically the time to select menu items. Statistical analysis suggested which graphical adaptive menus were significantly better or worse than the static menu, our baseline. These results are used as the basis to suggest implications for software developers and researchers to design more effective adaptive user interfaces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 112598"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User experience with adaptive user interfaces: Comparing performance and preferences\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Gaspar-Figueiredo , Jean Vanderdonckt , Silvia Abrahão , Emilio Insfran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Adaptive user interfaces dynamically change their content, presentation, and behavior to optimize the user experience, which has been primarily evaluated using classic usability measures but to a lesser extent by using neurological measures. While the perceived preference of specific user interface elements, such as graphical adaptive menus, has already been studied, no consensus exists regarding their performance and how to substitute a static menu with an adaptive one. To gain insights into how graphical adaptive menus could influence the user experience and to identify any correlation between users’ performance and their preferences, we conducted an experiment in which forty participants used twenty graphical adaptive menus while their brain activity was captured by employing electroencephalography to derive four measures (<em>i.e.</em>, cognitive load, engagement, attraction, and memorization). User performance was measured using task completion time, specifically the time to select menu items. Statistical analysis suggested which graphical adaptive menus were significantly better or worse than the static menu, our baseline. These results are used as the basis to suggest implications for software developers and researchers to design more effective adaptive user interfaces.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"231 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225002675\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225002675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
User experience with adaptive user interfaces: Comparing performance and preferences
Adaptive user interfaces dynamically change their content, presentation, and behavior to optimize the user experience, which has been primarily evaluated using classic usability measures but to a lesser extent by using neurological measures. While the perceived preference of specific user interface elements, such as graphical adaptive menus, has already been studied, no consensus exists regarding their performance and how to substitute a static menu with an adaptive one. To gain insights into how graphical adaptive menus could influence the user experience and to identify any correlation between users’ performance and their preferences, we conducted an experiment in which forty participants used twenty graphical adaptive menus while their brain activity was captured by employing electroencephalography to derive four measures (i.e., cognitive load, engagement, attraction, and memorization). User performance was measured using task completion time, specifically the time to select menu items. Statistical analysis suggested which graphical adaptive menus were significantly better or worse than the static menu, our baseline. These results are used as the basis to suggest implications for software developers and researchers to design more effective adaptive user interfaces.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:
•Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution
•Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development
•Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems
•Human factors and management concerns of software development
•Data management and big data issues of software systems
•Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources
•Business and economic aspects of software development processes
The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.