与急性膝关节损伤相关的TikTok视频通常是不准确、不完整的,并且是由非医生制作的

Q3 Medicine
Levi M. Travis B.S., Jacob Jahn B.S., Natalie K. Blanc B.S., Lee Kaplan M.D.
{"title":"与急性膝关节损伤相关的TikTok视频通常是不准确、不完整的,并且是由非医生制作的","authors":"Levi M. Travis B.S.,&nbsp;Jacob Jahn B.S.,&nbsp;Natalie K. Blanc B.S.,&nbsp;Lee Kaplan M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate TikTok videos related to knee injuries, examining the accuracy and sources of the content, the category of information provided, the reach of the videos, and the capability of the videos to cause harm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>On September 1, 2024, TikTok was queried using layperson’s terms for acute knee injuries (e.g., “ACL tear”) to identify popular hashtags. The top 10 videos per hashtag and 5 videos per search term (e.g., “knee pop”) by view count were included if they related to the specified knee injury, surgery, or recovery process. Videos with fewer than 1,000 views were excluded. Metrics such as number of likes, number of views, number of comments, creator demographic characteristics, and video content type were collected, and videos were evaluated for quality using the DISCERN scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 234 TikTok videos related to knee injuries were analyzed, averaging 699,235 views per video (median, 138,500 views). DISCERN analysis revealed that 41% of videos were rated as poor whereas 59% were satisfactory. Videos featuring medical recommendations had significantly higher engagement scores (mean, 5.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.49-6.83; <em>P</em> = .001) and longer durations (mean, 53.38 seconds; 95% CI, 44.47-62.28 seconds; <em>P</em> = .002) than those without recommendations (mean score, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.84-3.52]; mean duration, 38.10 seconds [95% CI, 33.18-43.01 seconds]). Satisfactory videos outperformed poor-quality videos across DISCERN metrics, with clearer aims (mean, 3.91 vs 2.72; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), greater relevance (mean, 3.20 vs 2.09; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and more balanced information (mean, 1.60 vs 1.00; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Physicians created 24.4% of the videos, which generally scored higher according to the DISCERN criteria than videos created by non–health care–related professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Videos created by health care professionals, particularly physicians, scored higher in terms of educational quality but accounted for a small proportion of total content. In contrast, nonphysician creators frequently provided inaccurate or incomplete information. Despite this, videos with medical recommendations achieved higher engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>There is a predominance of nonphysician creators disseminating inaccurate medical information, underscoring the need for orthopaedic surgeons to engage in digital health education to provide reliable content. This study provides insights into the digital content patients may be consuming regarding their medical conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 101195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Knee Injury-Related TikTok Videos Are Frequently Inaccurate, Incomplete, and Created by Nonphysicians\",\"authors\":\"Levi M. Travis B.S.,&nbsp;Jacob Jahn B.S.,&nbsp;Natalie K. Blanc B.S.,&nbsp;Lee Kaplan M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate TikTok videos related to knee injuries, examining the accuracy and sources of the content, the category of information provided, the reach of the videos, and the capability of the videos to cause harm.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>On September 1, 2024, TikTok was queried using layperson’s terms for acute knee injuries (e.g., “ACL tear”) to identify popular hashtags. The top 10 videos per hashtag and 5 videos per search term (e.g., “knee pop”) by view count were included if they related to the specified knee injury, surgery, or recovery process. Videos with fewer than 1,000 views were excluded. Metrics such as number of likes, number of views, number of comments, creator demographic characteristics, and video content type were collected, and videos were evaluated for quality using the DISCERN scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 234 TikTok videos related to knee injuries were analyzed, averaging 699,235 views per video (median, 138,500 views). DISCERN analysis revealed that 41% of videos were rated as poor whereas 59% were satisfactory. Videos featuring medical recommendations had significantly higher engagement scores (mean, 5.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.49-6.83; <em>P</em> = .001) and longer durations (mean, 53.38 seconds; 95% CI, 44.47-62.28 seconds; <em>P</em> = .002) than those without recommendations (mean score, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.84-3.52]; mean duration, 38.10 seconds [95% CI, 33.18-43.01 seconds]). Satisfactory videos outperformed poor-quality videos across DISCERN metrics, with clearer aims (mean, 3.91 vs 2.72; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), greater relevance (mean, 3.20 vs 2.09; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), and more balanced information (mean, 1.60 vs 1.00; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Physicians created 24.4% of the videos, which generally scored higher according to the DISCERN criteria than videos created by non–health care–related professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Videos created by health care professionals, particularly physicians, scored higher in terms of educational quality but accounted for a small proportion of total content. In contrast, nonphysician creators frequently provided inaccurate or incomplete information. Despite this, videos with medical recommendations achieved higher engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>There is a predominance of nonphysician creators disseminating inaccurate medical information, underscoring the need for orthopaedic surgeons to engage in digital health education to provide reliable content. This study provides insights into the digital content patients may be consuming regarding their medical conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2500121X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X2500121X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估与膝关节损伤相关的TikTok视频,检查内容的准确性和来源、提供的信息类别、视频的覆盖范围以及视频造成伤害的能力。方法在2024年9月1日,使用外行人对急性膝关节损伤(例如“ACL撕裂”)的术语对TikTok进行查询,以识别流行的标签。如果与特定的膝盖损伤、手术或恢复过程有关,则包括每个标签的前10个视频和每个搜索词(例如,“膝盖流行”)的5个视频。观看次数少于1000次的视频被排除在外。收集了诸如点赞数、观看数、评论数、创作者人口统计学特征和视频内容类型等指标,并使用DISCERN评分系统评估视频的质量。结果共分析了234个与膝关节损伤相关的TikTok视频,平均每个视频观看次数为699235次(中位数为138500次)。DISCERN分析显示,41%的视频被评为差,而59%的视频被评为满意。有医疗建议的视频比没有医疗建议的视频(平均得分3.18 [95% CI, 2.84-3.52],平均时长38.10秒[95% CI, 33.18-43.01])具有更高的参与度得分(平均值5.16,95%可信区间[CI], 3.49-6.83, P = .001)和更长的持续时间(平均值53.38秒,95% CI, 44.47-62.28秒,P = .002)。在DISCERN指标中,令人满意的视频表现优于质量较差的视频,目标更明确(平均值,3.91 vs 2.72; P < .001),相关性更强(平均值,3.20 vs 2.09; P < .001),信息更平衡(平均值,1.60 vs 1.00; P < .001)。医生制作了24.4%的视频,根据DISCERN标准,这些视频的得分通常高于非医疗保健相关专业人员制作的视频。结论医疗专业人员,特别是医生制作的视频在教育质量方面得分较高,但占总内容的比例很小。相比之下,非医师的创建者经常提供不准确或不完整的信息。尽管如此,带有医疗建议的视频获得了更高的参与度。临床相关性非医师创作者传播不准确的医疗信息占主导地位,这强调了骨科医生参与数字健康教育以提供可靠内容的必要性。这项研究提供了对患者可能消费的有关其医疗状况的数字内容的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Knee Injury-Related TikTok Videos Are Frequently Inaccurate, Incomplete, and Created by Nonphysicians

Purpose

To evaluate TikTok videos related to knee injuries, examining the accuracy and sources of the content, the category of information provided, the reach of the videos, and the capability of the videos to cause harm.

Methods

On September 1, 2024, TikTok was queried using layperson’s terms for acute knee injuries (e.g., “ACL tear”) to identify popular hashtags. The top 10 videos per hashtag and 5 videos per search term (e.g., “knee pop”) by view count were included if they related to the specified knee injury, surgery, or recovery process. Videos with fewer than 1,000 views were excluded. Metrics such as number of likes, number of views, number of comments, creator demographic characteristics, and video content type were collected, and videos were evaluated for quality using the DISCERN scoring system.

Results

A total of 234 TikTok videos related to knee injuries were analyzed, averaging 699,235 views per video (median, 138,500 views). DISCERN analysis revealed that 41% of videos were rated as poor whereas 59% were satisfactory. Videos featuring medical recommendations had significantly higher engagement scores (mean, 5.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.49-6.83; P = .001) and longer durations (mean, 53.38 seconds; 95% CI, 44.47-62.28 seconds; P = .002) than those without recommendations (mean score, 3.18 [95% CI, 2.84-3.52]; mean duration, 38.10 seconds [95% CI, 33.18-43.01 seconds]). Satisfactory videos outperformed poor-quality videos across DISCERN metrics, with clearer aims (mean, 3.91 vs 2.72; P < .001), greater relevance (mean, 3.20 vs 2.09; P < .001), and more balanced information (mean, 1.60 vs 1.00; P < .001). Physicians created 24.4% of the videos, which generally scored higher according to the DISCERN criteria than videos created by non–health care–related professionals.

Conclusions

Videos created by health care professionals, particularly physicians, scored higher in terms of educational quality but accounted for a small proportion of total content. In contrast, nonphysician creators frequently provided inaccurate or incomplete information. Despite this, videos with medical recommendations achieved higher engagement.

Clinical Relevance

There is a predominance of nonphysician creators disseminating inaccurate medical information, underscoring the need for orthopaedic surgeons to engage in digital health education to provide reliable content. This study provides insights into the digital content patients may be consuming regarding their medical conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信