了解患者对数字化吸烟史数据收集的看法

Kayla C. Jones MA , Lauren E. Kearney MD , Emily Jansen MPH , Nicholas Cordella MD , Hasmeena Kathuria MD , Katrina Steiling MD
{"title":"了解患者对数字化吸烟史数据收集的看法","authors":"Kayla C. Jones MA ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Kearney MD ,&nbsp;Emily Jansen MPH ,&nbsp;Nicholas Cordella MD ,&nbsp;Hasmeena Kathuria MD ,&nbsp;Katrina Steiling MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lung cancer screening with an annual low-dose CT scan is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for high-risk patients based on age (50-80 years of age) and smoking history (≥ 20 pack-years). Inaccurate smoking history data in the electronic health record (EHR) pose a challenge to identifying eligible patients. Digital strategies to collect patient-generated health data (PGHD) are a potential solution to elicit complete smoking histories directly from patients to then integrate into their EHR.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>How do patients perceive and experience the use of digital outreach strategies to collect smoking history data to determine lung cancer screening eligibility?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>As part of a quality improvement initiative, semistructured qualitative interviews were completed with a diverse group of patients who had received a request to complete a digital smoking history survey. Rapid analytical methods were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We completed 20 interviews with patients who did (n = 9) and did not (n = 11) complete the digital smoking history survey. Participants described varied preferences for digitally self-updating their smoking histories. Four themes emerged regarding barriers to uptake including (1) participants prefer to update their health record with a clinician, (2) technologic barriers influence participant engagement with digital PGHD collection strategies, (3) multiple options for collecting smoking frequency are needed to align with a variety of behaviors, and (4) participants have mixed perceptions of the value of accurate and updated EHR smoking data.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our findings highlight the need to address barriers to collection of digital PGHD to optimize reach and uptake. Using PGHD to obtain an updated and accurate smoking history has important implications, and incorporating patient education, strategies to overcome technologic barriers, and multiple metric options to collect smoking history may improve use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Patient Perspectives on Digital Smoking History Data Collection\",\"authors\":\"Kayla C. Jones MA ,&nbsp;Lauren E. Kearney MD ,&nbsp;Emily Jansen MPH ,&nbsp;Nicholas Cordella MD ,&nbsp;Hasmeena Kathuria MD ,&nbsp;Katrina Steiling MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Lung cancer screening with an annual low-dose CT scan is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for high-risk patients based on age (50-80 years of age) and smoking history (≥ 20 pack-years). Inaccurate smoking history data in the electronic health record (EHR) pose a challenge to identifying eligible patients. Digital strategies to collect patient-generated health data (PGHD) are a potential solution to elicit complete smoking histories directly from patients to then integrate into their EHR.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>How do patients perceive and experience the use of digital outreach strategies to collect smoking history data to determine lung cancer screening eligibility?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>As part of a quality improvement initiative, semistructured qualitative interviews were completed with a diverse group of patients who had received a request to complete a digital smoking history survey. Rapid analytical methods were used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We completed 20 interviews with patients who did (n = 9) and did not (n = 11) complete the digital smoking history survey. Participants described varied preferences for digitally self-updating their smoking histories. Four themes emerged regarding barriers to uptake including (1) participants prefer to update their health record with a clinician, (2) technologic barriers influence participant engagement with digital PGHD collection strategies, (3) multiple options for collecting smoking frequency are needed to align with a variety of behaviors, and (4) participants have mixed perceptions of the value of accurate and updated EHR smoking data.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our findings highlight the need to address barriers to collection of digital PGHD to optimize reach and uptake. Using PGHD to obtain an updated and accurate smoking history has important implications, and incorporating patient education, strategies to overcome technologic barriers, and multiple metric options to collect smoking history may improve use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789225000479\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789225000479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国预防服务工作组建议基于年龄(50-80岁)和吸烟史(≥20包年)的高危患者每年进行一次低剂量CT扫描进行肺癌筛查。电子健康记录(EHR)中不准确的吸烟史数据对确定符合条件的患者提出了挑战。收集患者生成的健康数据(PGHD)的数字策略是一种潜在的解决方案,可以直接从患者那里获取完整的吸烟史,然后将其整合到他们的电子病历中。研究问题:患者如何感知和体验使用数字外展策略来收集吸烟史数据以确定肺癌筛查的资格?研究设计和方法作为质量改进计划的一部分,对收到要求完成数字吸烟史调查的不同患者组进行了半结构化定性访谈。采用快速分析方法。结果我们完成了20例患者的访谈,其中完成了(n = 9)和未完成(n = 11)数字吸烟史调查。参与者描述了他们对数字化自我更新吸烟史的不同偏好。关于吸收障碍出现了四个主题,包括(1)参与者更喜欢与临床医生一起更新他们的健康记录,(2)技术障碍影响参与者对数字PGHD收集策略的参与,(3)收集吸烟频率的多种选择需要与各种行为保持一致,(4)参与者对准确和更新的电子病历吸烟数据的价值有不同的看法。我们的研究结果强调需要解决收集数字PGHD的障碍,以优化覆盖范围和吸收。使用PGHD获取最新准确的吸烟史具有重要意义,结合患者教育、克服技术障碍的策略以及收集吸烟史的多种度量选择可能会提高使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding Patient Perspectives on Digital Smoking History Data Collection

Background

Lung cancer screening with an annual low-dose CT scan is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for high-risk patients based on age (50-80 years of age) and smoking history (≥ 20 pack-years). Inaccurate smoking history data in the electronic health record (EHR) pose a challenge to identifying eligible patients. Digital strategies to collect patient-generated health data (PGHD) are a potential solution to elicit complete smoking histories directly from patients to then integrate into their EHR.

Research Question

How do patients perceive and experience the use of digital outreach strategies to collect smoking history data to determine lung cancer screening eligibility?

Study Design and Methods

As part of a quality improvement initiative, semistructured qualitative interviews were completed with a diverse group of patients who had received a request to complete a digital smoking history survey. Rapid analytical methods were used.

Results

We completed 20 interviews with patients who did (n = 9) and did not (n = 11) complete the digital smoking history survey. Participants described varied preferences for digitally self-updating their smoking histories. Four themes emerged regarding barriers to uptake including (1) participants prefer to update their health record with a clinician, (2) technologic barriers influence participant engagement with digital PGHD collection strategies, (3) multiple options for collecting smoking frequency are needed to align with a variety of behaviors, and (4) participants have mixed perceptions of the value of accurate and updated EHR smoking data.

Interpretation

Our findings highlight the need to address barriers to collection of digital PGHD to optimize reach and uptake. Using PGHD to obtain an updated and accurate smoking history has important implications, and incorporating patient education, strategies to overcome technologic barriers, and multiple metric options to collect smoking history may improve use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信