Isabelle Uny , Denview Magalasi , Marsha Orgill , Cissie Namanda , Gemma Mitchell , Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye , Linda Bauld , Charles Parry , Niamh Fitzgerald , Benjamin Kaneka
{"title":"马拉维酒精政策制定中的竞争联盟:酒精小袋禁令的回顾性案例研究分析","authors":"Isabelle Uny , Denview Magalasi , Marsha Orgill , Cissie Namanda , Gemma Mitchell , Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye , Linda Bauld , Charles Parry , Niamh Fitzgerald , Benjamin Kaneka","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Harmful alcohol consumption has significant public health implications across Africa and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. In Malawi, the emergence of alcohol sachets - small, affordable plastic packets containing high-strength spirits – and their consumption, has raised substantial public health concerns. In particular, the resulting access and consumption amongst young people, led to a ban on those products by the Malawi Government in 2017. This study focuses on the policy process of the sachets ban, from agenda setting, to formulation and covers the modalities for implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective policy case study involving a documentary analysis of all key regulatory documents and in-depth interviews with thirteen policy stakeholders and key informants. The Advocacy Coalition Framework was used to guide the analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings reveal a long and contested process involving two primary coalitions. The pro-ban coalition (NGOs, civil society organizations, religious leaders, and government representatives), which used empirical and local evidence on sachet alcohol-related harms, particularly among young people, to emphasize the need to regulate. The opposing coalition (spearheaded by alcohol and plastics manufacturers) mounted multiple legal challenges, stalling the policy formulation of the ban. Ultimately, a strong enduring public health coalition, a high court ruling and a decisive government decision facilitated a final and complete ban in 2017.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This analysis demonstrates how public health advocates successfully countered industry interference through evidence-based advocacy, community engagement, and strategic coalition-building. The Malawi case offers valuable lessons for other African countries considering similar alcohol control measures, highlighting the role of coalitions, the importance of framing alcohol regulations as public health protections, and of developing robust implementation mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104979"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing coalitions in alcohol policymaking in Malawi: a retrospective case study analysis of the alcohol sachet ban\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Uny , Denview Magalasi , Marsha Orgill , Cissie Namanda , Gemma Mitchell , Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye , Linda Bauld , Charles Parry , Niamh Fitzgerald , Benjamin Kaneka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Harmful alcohol consumption has significant public health implications across Africa and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. In Malawi, the emergence of alcohol sachets - small, affordable plastic packets containing high-strength spirits – and their consumption, has raised substantial public health concerns. In particular, the resulting access and consumption amongst young people, led to a ban on those products by the Malawi Government in 2017. This study focuses on the policy process of the sachets ban, from agenda setting, to formulation and covers the modalities for implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective policy case study involving a documentary analysis of all key regulatory documents and in-depth interviews with thirteen policy stakeholders and key informants. The Advocacy Coalition Framework was used to guide the analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings reveal a long and contested process involving two primary coalitions. The pro-ban coalition (NGOs, civil society organizations, religious leaders, and government representatives), which used empirical and local evidence on sachet alcohol-related harms, particularly among young people, to emphasize the need to regulate. The opposing coalition (spearheaded by alcohol and plastics manufacturers) mounted multiple legal challenges, stalling the policy formulation of the ban. Ultimately, a strong enduring public health coalition, a high court ruling and a decisive government decision facilitated a final and complete ban in 2017.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This analysis demonstrates how public health advocates successfully countered industry interference through evidence-based advocacy, community engagement, and strategic coalition-building. The Malawi case offers valuable lessons for other African countries considering similar alcohol control measures, highlighting the role of coalitions, the importance of framing alcohol regulations as public health protections, and of developing robust implementation mechanisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104979\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002750\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002750","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Competing coalitions in alcohol policymaking in Malawi: a retrospective case study analysis of the alcohol sachet ban
Background
Harmful alcohol consumption has significant public health implications across Africa and disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. In Malawi, the emergence of alcohol sachets - small, affordable plastic packets containing high-strength spirits – and their consumption, has raised substantial public health concerns. In particular, the resulting access and consumption amongst young people, led to a ban on those products by the Malawi Government in 2017. This study focuses on the policy process of the sachets ban, from agenda setting, to formulation and covers the modalities for implementation.
Methods
Retrospective policy case study involving a documentary analysis of all key regulatory documents and in-depth interviews with thirteen policy stakeholders and key informants. The Advocacy Coalition Framework was used to guide the analysis.
Results
The findings reveal a long and contested process involving two primary coalitions. The pro-ban coalition (NGOs, civil society organizations, religious leaders, and government representatives), which used empirical and local evidence on sachet alcohol-related harms, particularly among young people, to emphasize the need to regulate. The opposing coalition (spearheaded by alcohol and plastics manufacturers) mounted multiple legal challenges, stalling the policy formulation of the ban. Ultimately, a strong enduring public health coalition, a high court ruling and a decisive government decision facilitated a final and complete ban in 2017.
Conclusion
This analysis demonstrates how public health advocates successfully countered industry interference through evidence-based advocacy, community engagement, and strategic coalition-building. The Malawi case offers valuable lessons for other African countries considering similar alcohol control measures, highlighting the role of coalitions, the importance of framing alcohol regulations as public health protections, and of developing robust implementation mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.