探索LGBT+人群的医疗保健经历和偏好:一项在线异步焦点小组研究

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
John P. Gilmore, David J. Field
{"title":"探索LGBT+人群的医疗保健经历和偏好:一项在线异步焦点小组研究","authors":"John P. Gilmore, David J. Field","doi":"10.1111/jan.70210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo explore experiences of LGBT+ individuals in accessing and receiving healthcare in Ireland, and to identify opportunities for more inclusive and equitable healthcare delivery.DesignA descriptive qualitative study using asynchronous online focus groups.MethodsAsynchronous online focus groups were conducted using the MURAL collaborative platform over a three‐week period in 2023. Participants (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 43) self‐selected into one of three focus groups based on gender and sexual identity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate key themes.ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) Culturally aware healthcare professionals; (2) Access and information; (3) Specialist versus universal services; and (4) Mental health support. Participants reported frequent experiences of misgendering, heteronormative assumptions, and provider inexperience. Geographic inequities, unclear referral pathways, and a lack of centralised, inclusive information were also key barriers. While specialist services were valued, participants advocated for a dual approach that integrates LGBT+ competence into all healthcare settings.ConclusionDespite legal and social progress, LGBT+ individuals in Ireland continue to encounter significant barriers to equitable healthcare. The findings highlight a need for improved cultural competence, better access to inclusive services, and systemic reform.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareHealthcare providers must receive comprehensive training in LGBT+ health to ensure respectful, appropriate, and inclusive care. Enhanced visibility of inclusive providers and improved service pathways are needed to address current inequities, particularly in mental health and gender‐affirming care.ImpactThis study identifies key gaps in provider competence, service accessibility, and mental health provision. Findings will inform healthcare education, policy development, and service design to improve experiences and outcomes for LGBT+ individuals in both urban and rural contexts.Reporting MethodThis study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution was involved.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Healthcare Experiences and Preferences of LGBT+ People: An Online Asynchronous Focus Group Study\",\"authors\":\"John P. Gilmore, David J. Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jan.70210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimTo explore experiences of LGBT+ individuals in accessing and receiving healthcare in Ireland, and to identify opportunities for more inclusive and equitable healthcare delivery.DesignA descriptive qualitative study using asynchronous online focus groups.MethodsAsynchronous online focus groups were conducted using the MURAL collaborative platform over a three‐week period in 2023. Participants (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 43) self‐selected into one of three focus groups based on gender and sexual identity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate key themes.ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) Culturally aware healthcare professionals; (2) Access and information; (3) Specialist versus universal services; and (4) Mental health support. Participants reported frequent experiences of misgendering, heteronormative assumptions, and provider inexperience. Geographic inequities, unclear referral pathways, and a lack of centralised, inclusive information were also key barriers. While specialist services were valued, participants advocated for a dual approach that integrates LGBT+ competence into all healthcare settings.ConclusionDespite legal and social progress, LGBT+ individuals in Ireland continue to encounter significant barriers to equitable healthcare. The findings highlight a need for improved cultural competence, better access to inclusive services, and systemic reform.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareHealthcare providers must receive comprehensive training in LGBT+ health to ensure respectful, appropriate, and inclusive care. Enhanced visibility of inclusive providers and improved service pathways are needed to address current inequities, particularly in mental health and gender‐affirming care.ImpactThis study identifies key gaps in provider competence, service accessibility, and mental health provision. Findings will inform healthcare education, policy development, and service design to improve experiences and outcomes for LGBT+ individuals in both urban and rural contexts.Reporting MethodThis study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution was involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70210\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨LGBT+个人在爱尔兰获得和接受医疗保健的经历,并确定更加包容和公平的医疗保健服务的机会。设计一项使用异步在线焦点小组的描述性定性研究。方法在2023年使用壁画协作平台进行为期三周的异步在线焦点小组。参与者(n = 43)根据性别和性身份自我选择进入三个焦点小组之一。数据分析使用反身性专题分析,以产生关键主题。结果确定了四个主题:(1)具有文化意识的卫生保健专业人员;(2)途径和信息;(3)专科服务与普遍服务;(4)心理健康支持。参与者报告了性别错误、异性恋假设和提供者缺乏经验的频繁经历。地域不平等、转诊途径不明确以及缺乏集中、包容的信息也是主要障碍。虽然专家服务受到重视,但与会者主张采取双重方法,将LGBT+能力整合到所有医疗保健环境中。结论:尽管在法律和社会方面取得了进步,爱尔兰的LGBT+个人在获得公平医疗保健方面仍然面临着重大障碍。调查结果强调,需要提高文化能力,更好地获得包容性服务,并进行系统性改革。对职业和/或患者护理的影响医疗保健提供者必须接受LGBT+健康方面的全面培训,以确保尊重、适当和包容的护理。需要提高包容性提供者的可见度并改进服务途径,以解决当前的不平等现象,特别是在精神卫生和性别肯定护理方面。影响本研究确定了提供者能力、服务可及性和心理健康提供方面的主要差距。研究结果将为医疗保健教育、政策制定和服务设计提供信息,以改善城市和农村LGBT+人群的经历和结果。报告方法本研究遵循定性研究报告标准(SRQR)。患者或公众捐款未涉及患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Healthcare Experiences and Preferences of LGBT+ People: An Online Asynchronous Focus Group Study
AimTo explore experiences of LGBT+ individuals in accessing and receiving healthcare in Ireland, and to identify opportunities for more inclusive and equitable healthcare delivery.DesignA descriptive qualitative study using asynchronous online focus groups.MethodsAsynchronous online focus groups were conducted using the MURAL collaborative platform over a three‐week period in 2023. Participants (n = 43) self‐selected into one of three focus groups based on gender and sexual identity. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate key themes.ResultsFour themes were identified: (1) Culturally aware healthcare professionals; (2) Access and information; (3) Specialist versus universal services; and (4) Mental health support. Participants reported frequent experiences of misgendering, heteronormative assumptions, and provider inexperience. Geographic inequities, unclear referral pathways, and a lack of centralised, inclusive information were also key barriers. While specialist services were valued, participants advocated for a dual approach that integrates LGBT+ competence into all healthcare settings.ConclusionDespite legal and social progress, LGBT+ individuals in Ireland continue to encounter significant barriers to equitable healthcare. The findings highlight a need for improved cultural competence, better access to inclusive services, and systemic reform.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareHealthcare providers must receive comprehensive training in LGBT+ health to ensure respectful, appropriate, and inclusive care. Enhanced visibility of inclusive providers and improved service pathways are needed to address current inequities, particularly in mental health and gender‐affirming care.ImpactThis study identifies key gaps in provider competence, service accessibility, and mental health provision. Findings will inform healthcare education, policy development, and service design to improve experiences and outcomes for LGBT+ individuals in both urban and rural contexts.Reporting MethodThis study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution was involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信