AI-NLME:一种新的人工智能驱动的非线性混合效应建模方法,用于分析随机安慰剂对照临床试验的纵向数据

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Roberto Gomeni, Françoise Bressolle-Gomeni
{"title":"AI-NLME:一种新的人工智能驱动的非线性混合效应建模方法,用于分析随机安慰剂对照临床试验的纵向数据","authors":"Roberto Gomeni,&nbsp;Françoise Bressolle-Gomeni","doi":"10.1111/cts.70345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A propensity weighted (PSW) methodology was recently proposed for assessing the treatment effect conditional to the probability of non-specific response to a treatment (prob-NSRT). Prob-NSRT was estimated using an artificial neural network (ANN) model applied to pre-randomization and study endpoint observations in a placebo arm of a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Placebo data were initially used to estimate prob-NSRT, then the ANN model was applied to the data of each individual in each treatment arm (placebo + active) for estimating the individual prob-NSRT, and finally all data in the trial enriched by the prob-NSRT values were used to assess the treatment effect. One of the major limitations of this methodology was that the ANN model was developed and applied to analyze data in the same dataset. To overcome this limitation, a new artificial intelligence driven nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach (AI-NLME) is proposed. This approach involves the development of the ANN model using a dataset that is independent from the dataset used to estimate the treatment effect. A case study is presented using data from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in major depressive disorders. The AI-NLME approach provided an effective tool for controlling the confounding effect of treatment non-specific response, for increasing signal detection, for decreasing heterogeneity in the response, for increasing the effect size, for better assessing the responder rate, and for providing a reliable estimate of the “true” treatment effect. These findings provide convergent evidence on the potential role of AI-NLME to become the reference approach for analyzing placebo-controlled clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70345","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-NLME: A New Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Approach for Analyzing Longitudinal Data in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Gomeni,&nbsp;Françoise Bressolle-Gomeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A propensity weighted (PSW) methodology was recently proposed for assessing the treatment effect conditional to the probability of non-specific response to a treatment (prob-NSRT). Prob-NSRT was estimated using an artificial neural network (ANN) model applied to pre-randomization and study endpoint observations in a placebo arm of a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Placebo data were initially used to estimate prob-NSRT, then the ANN model was applied to the data of each individual in each treatment arm (placebo + active) for estimating the individual prob-NSRT, and finally all data in the trial enriched by the prob-NSRT values were used to assess the treatment effect. One of the major limitations of this methodology was that the ANN model was developed and applied to analyze data in the same dataset. To overcome this limitation, a new artificial intelligence driven nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach (AI-NLME) is proposed. This approach involves the development of the ANN model using a dataset that is independent from the dataset used to estimate the treatment effect. A case study is presented using data from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in major depressive disorders. The AI-NLME approach provided an effective tool for controlling the confounding effect of treatment non-specific response, for increasing signal detection, for decreasing heterogeneity in the response, for increasing the effect size, for better assessing the responder rate, and for providing a reliable estimate of the “true” treatment effect. These findings provide convergent evidence on the potential role of AI-NLME to become the reference approach for analyzing placebo-controlled clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70345\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70345\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70345","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近提出了一种倾向加权(PSW)方法,用于评估治疗效果的条件是对治疗(probi - nsrt)的非特异性反应的概率。probn - nsrt使用人工神经网络(ANN)模型估计,该模型应用于安慰剂对照临床试验的安慰剂组的预随机化和研究终点观察。首先使用安慰剂数据估计probn - nsrt,然后将神经网络模型应用于每个治疗组(安慰剂+活性组)每个个体的数据来估计个体probn - nsrt,最后使用试验中所有被probn - nsrt值丰富的数据来评估治疗效果。这种方法的主要局限性之一是,人工神经网络模型被开发和应用于分析同一数据集中的数据。为了克服这一局限性,提出了一种新的人工智能驱动的非线性混合效应建模方法(AI-NLME)。这种方法涉及使用独立于用于估计治疗效果的数据集的数据集开发人工神经网络模型。一个案例研究提出了使用数据的随机,安慰剂对照试验在重度抑郁症。AI-NLME方法为控制治疗非特异性反应的混杂效应、增加信号检测、减少反应的异质性、增加效应大小、更好地评估应答率以及提供“真实”治疗效果的可靠估计提供了有效工具。这些发现为AI-NLME作为分析安慰剂对照临床试验的参考方法的潜在作用提供了趋同的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

AI-NLME: A New Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Approach for Analyzing Longitudinal Data in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

AI-NLME: A New Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Approach for Analyzing Longitudinal Data in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

AI-NLME: A New Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Approach for Analyzing Longitudinal Data in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

AI-NLME: A New Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Approach for Analyzing Longitudinal Data in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

AI-NLME: A New Artificial Intelligence-Driven Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Approach for Analyzing Longitudinal Data in Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials

A propensity weighted (PSW) methodology was recently proposed for assessing the treatment effect conditional to the probability of non-specific response to a treatment (prob-NSRT). Prob-NSRT was estimated using an artificial neural network (ANN) model applied to pre-randomization and study endpoint observations in a placebo arm of a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Placebo data were initially used to estimate prob-NSRT, then the ANN model was applied to the data of each individual in each treatment arm (placebo + active) for estimating the individual prob-NSRT, and finally all data in the trial enriched by the prob-NSRT values were used to assess the treatment effect. One of the major limitations of this methodology was that the ANN model was developed and applied to analyze data in the same dataset. To overcome this limitation, a new artificial intelligence driven nonlinear mixed effect modeling approach (AI-NLME) is proposed. This approach involves the development of the ANN model using a dataset that is independent from the dataset used to estimate the treatment effect. A case study is presented using data from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in major depressive disorders. The AI-NLME approach provided an effective tool for controlling the confounding effect of treatment non-specific response, for increasing signal detection, for decreasing heterogeneity in the response, for increasing the effect size, for better assessing the responder rate, and for providing a reliable estimate of the “true” treatment effect. These findings provide convergent evidence on the potential role of AI-NLME to become the reference approach for analyzing placebo-controlled clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信