黑鼠(Rattus Rattus)对海岛雨林植物群落中木本植物种子和幼苗的潜在影响

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Austral Ecology Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1111/aec.70109
Annabel B. Ellis, Dieter F. Hochuli, Peter B. Banks
{"title":"黑鼠(Rattus Rattus)对海岛雨林植物群落中木本植物种子和幼苗的潜在影响","authors":"Annabel B. Ellis,&nbsp;Dieter F. Hochuli,&nbsp;Peter B. Banks","doi":"10.1111/aec.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invasive rodents are among the world's most damaging invasive species linked to declines and extinctions of many vertebrate and invertebrate species, especially in island ecosystems. However, despite a mainly herbivorous diet, their impacts on plant communities are less well known, with few studies in Australian ecosystems. We studied the potential impacts of high-density populations of invasive black rats (<i>Rattus rattus</i>) on the restoration of an endangered ecological community of sub-tropical rainforest on two small islands in southeastern Australia. We used two experiments to investigate rat impacts on two woody rainforest species, <i>Hibiscus heterophyllus</i> and <i>Acacia maidenii</i>, that are frequently used for successional planting in restoration. We hypothesised that, as black rats generally obtain a large amount of their diet from plants, they would rapidly damage <i>Hibiscus</i> and <i>Acacia</i> seedlings and consume <i>Hibiscus</i> seeds. We found that using cages to exclude black rats for 11–14 days had significant effects on herbivory of <i>Hibiscus</i> seedlings but not for <i>Acacia</i> seedlings. <i>Hibiscus</i> seedlings with no exclusion cage lost an average of 17% more leaves (1.83 of initial average 10.6 leaves per plant) when compared to caged seedlings. We also found that excluding rats reduced the number of <i>Hibiscus</i> seedlings damaged, although 50% of the damage was suspected to be caused by insects. Although only 4.5% of total <i>Hibiscus</i> seeds were removed during the 3-day experimental period, the night-time removal rate (mostly attributed to black rats) was 10 times more than that of other diurnal foragers. This rate of seed removal by black rats has the potential to contribute to poor restoration in rainforest but was lower than black rat consumption of seeds in other systems. We conclude that, in our system, black rats appear to have minimal potential impacts on these rainforest species, despite high rat densities, confirming the successful use of these species in restoration. However, being novel to the system, the additive effects of rats on seed loss over time warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential Impacts of Black Rats (Rattus rattus) on Seeds and Seedlings of Woody Species in a Regenerating Island Rainforest Plant Community\",\"authors\":\"Annabel B. Ellis,&nbsp;Dieter F. Hochuli,&nbsp;Peter B. Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Invasive rodents are among the world's most damaging invasive species linked to declines and extinctions of many vertebrate and invertebrate species, especially in island ecosystems. However, despite a mainly herbivorous diet, their impacts on plant communities are less well known, with few studies in Australian ecosystems. We studied the potential impacts of high-density populations of invasive black rats (<i>Rattus rattus</i>) on the restoration of an endangered ecological community of sub-tropical rainforest on two small islands in southeastern Australia. We used two experiments to investigate rat impacts on two woody rainforest species, <i>Hibiscus heterophyllus</i> and <i>Acacia maidenii</i>, that are frequently used for successional planting in restoration. We hypothesised that, as black rats generally obtain a large amount of their diet from plants, they would rapidly damage <i>Hibiscus</i> and <i>Acacia</i> seedlings and consume <i>Hibiscus</i> seeds. We found that using cages to exclude black rats for 11–14 days had significant effects on herbivory of <i>Hibiscus</i> seedlings but not for <i>Acacia</i> seedlings. <i>Hibiscus</i> seedlings with no exclusion cage lost an average of 17% more leaves (1.83 of initial average 10.6 leaves per plant) when compared to caged seedlings. We also found that excluding rats reduced the number of <i>Hibiscus</i> seedlings damaged, although 50% of the damage was suspected to be caused by insects. Although only 4.5% of total <i>Hibiscus</i> seeds were removed during the 3-day experimental period, the night-time removal rate (mostly attributed to black rats) was 10 times more than that of other diurnal foragers. This rate of seed removal by black rats has the potential to contribute to poor restoration in rainforest but was lower than black rat consumption of seeds in other systems. We conclude that, in our system, black rats appear to have minimal potential impacts on these rainforest species, despite high rat densities, confirming the successful use of these species in restoration. However, being novel to the system, the additive effects of rats on seed loss over time warrant further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"50 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70109\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

入侵啮齿动物是世界上最具破坏性的入侵物种之一,与许多脊椎动物和无脊椎动物物种的减少和灭绝有关,特别是在岛屿生态系统中。然而,尽管以草食为主,它们对植物群落的影响却鲜为人知,在澳大利亚生态系统中很少有研究。在澳大利亚东南部的两个小岛上,研究了入侵黑鼠(Rattus Rattus)高密度种群对亚热带雨林濒危生态群落恢复的潜在影响。通过两个实验,研究了鼠对恢复过程中常用的两种木本雨林树种——芙蓉和金合欢的影响。我们假设,由于黑鼠通常从植物中获取大量的食物,它们会迅速破坏木槿和金合欢的幼苗,并消耗木槿的种子。结果表明,笼内驱黑鼠11 ~ 14 d对木芙蓉幼苗的采食效果显著,而对金合欢幼苗的采食效果不显著。与笼中幼苗相比,没有隔离笼的木槿花幼苗平均多损失17%的叶子(平均每株10.6片叶子的1.83片)。我们还发现,排除老鼠减少了木槿幼苗受损的数量,尽管50%的损害被怀疑是由昆虫引起的。虽然在3天的实验期间,只有4.5%的木芙蓉种子被清除,但夜间的清除率(主要是黑鼠)是其他日间觅食者的10倍。黑鼠清除种子的速度可能会导致雨林恢复不佳,但低于其他系统中黑鼠对种子的消耗。我们的结论是,在我们的系统中,尽管老鼠密度很高,但黑鼠对这些雨林物种的潜在影响似乎很小,这证实了这些物种在恢复中的成功使用。然而,作为该系统的新事物,随着时间的推移,大鼠对种子损失的累加效应值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Potential Impacts of Black Rats (Rattus rattus) on Seeds and Seedlings of Woody Species in a Regenerating Island Rainforest Plant Community

Potential Impacts of Black Rats (Rattus rattus) on Seeds and Seedlings of Woody Species in a Regenerating Island Rainforest Plant Community

Invasive rodents are among the world's most damaging invasive species linked to declines and extinctions of many vertebrate and invertebrate species, especially in island ecosystems. However, despite a mainly herbivorous diet, their impacts on plant communities are less well known, with few studies in Australian ecosystems. We studied the potential impacts of high-density populations of invasive black rats (Rattus rattus) on the restoration of an endangered ecological community of sub-tropical rainforest on two small islands in southeastern Australia. We used two experiments to investigate rat impacts on two woody rainforest species, Hibiscus heterophyllus and Acacia maidenii, that are frequently used for successional planting in restoration. We hypothesised that, as black rats generally obtain a large amount of their diet from plants, they would rapidly damage Hibiscus and Acacia seedlings and consume Hibiscus seeds. We found that using cages to exclude black rats for 11–14 days had significant effects on herbivory of Hibiscus seedlings but not for Acacia seedlings. Hibiscus seedlings with no exclusion cage lost an average of 17% more leaves (1.83 of initial average 10.6 leaves per plant) when compared to caged seedlings. We also found that excluding rats reduced the number of Hibiscus seedlings damaged, although 50% of the damage was suspected to be caused by insects. Although only 4.5% of total Hibiscus seeds were removed during the 3-day experimental period, the night-time removal rate (mostly attributed to black rats) was 10 times more than that of other diurnal foragers. This rate of seed removal by black rats has the potential to contribute to poor restoration in rainforest but was lower than black rat consumption of seeds in other systems. We conclude that, in our system, black rats appear to have minimal potential impacts on these rainforest species, despite high rat densities, confirming the successful use of these species in restoration. However, being novel to the system, the additive effects of rats on seed loss over time warrant further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Ecology
Austral Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere. Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region. Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信