评估海洋世界陆上模拟场地的综合架构

IF 4 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Jennifer C. Stern, Heather V. Graham, Bradley Burcar, Emily S. Martin, Aaron Noell, Kevin Hand, Jeff S. Bowman, Peter Doran, Virginia Edgcomb, James F. Holden, Alta E. G. Howells, Michael J. Malaska, Brook L. Nunn, Jani Radebaugh, Laura E. Rodriguez, Schuyler Borges, Dina Bower, Samuel Courville, Melisa Diaz, Benjamin Hockman, Julie Huber, Justin Lawrence, Trista Vick-Majors, Conor A. Nixon, John R. Spear, Amanda V. Steckel, Anezina Solomonidou, Nicholas Schmerr, Britney Schmidt, Matthew O. Schrenk, Lauren Seyler, Amy R. Smith, Catherine C. Walker, Patrick Whelley, Natalie Wolfenbarger, Steven D. Vance
{"title":"评估海洋世界陆上模拟场地的综合架构","authors":"Jennifer C. Stern,&nbsp;Heather V. Graham,&nbsp;Bradley Burcar,&nbsp;Emily S. Martin,&nbsp;Aaron Noell,&nbsp;Kevin Hand,&nbsp;Jeff S. Bowman,&nbsp;Peter Doran,&nbsp;Virginia Edgcomb,&nbsp;James F. Holden,&nbsp;Alta E. G. Howells,&nbsp;Michael J. Malaska,&nbsp;Brook L. Nunn,&nbsp;Jani Radebaugh,&nbsp;Laura E. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Schuyler Borges,&nbsp;Dina Bower,&nbsp;Samuel Courville,&nbsp;Melisa Diaz,&nbsp;Benjamin Hockman,&nbsp;Julie Huber,&nbsp;Justin Lawrence,&nbsp;Trista Vick-Majors,&nbsp;Conor A. Nixon,&nbsp;John R. Spear,&nbsp;Amanda V. Steckel,&nbsp;Anezina Solomonidou,&nbsp;Nicholas Schmerr,&nbsp;Britney Schmidt,&nbsp;Matthew O. Schrenk,&nbsp;Lauren Seyler,&nbsp;Amy R. Smith,&nbsp;Catherine C. Walker,&nbsp;Patrick Whelley,&nbsp;Natalie Wolfenbarger,&nbsp;Steven D. Vance","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field studies at terrestrial analogue sites represent an important contribution to the science of ocean worlds. The value of the science and technology investigations conducted at field analogue sites depends on the relevance of the analogue environment to the target ocean world. We accept that there are no perfect analogues for many of the unique environments represented by ocean worlds but suggest that a one-to-one matching of environmental characteristics and conditions is not crucial to the success or impact of the work. Instead, we must determine which processes and parameters are required to map directly to the target ocean world environment with high fidelity to address the science question. In this review paper, we discuss the outcomes of a workshop aimed at developing a new framework for evaluating the suitability of analogue field locations for ocean worlds research. Here we present a two-step approach to (a) identify the most crucial processes and parameters associated with a given science question and (b) assess the fidelity of these processes and parameters at a proposed field site to those expected for the target ocean world. We demonstrate this approach in a test case evaluating three types of ocean world analogue environments with respect to a science question. The consensus document presented here equips veteran and new investigators with valuable tools to better assess and justify their analogue site selections.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer C. Stern,&nbsp;Heather V. Graham,&nbsp;Bradley Burcar,&nbsp;Emily S. Martin,&nbsp;Aaron Noell,&nbsp;Kevin Hand,&nbsp;Jeff S. Bowman,&nbsp;Peter Doran,&nbsp;Virginia Edgcomb,&nbsp;James F. Holden,&nbsp;Alta E. G. Howells,&nbsp;Michael J. Malaska,&nbsp;Brook L. Nunn,&nbsp;Jani Radebaugh,&nbsp;Laura E. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Schuyler Borges,&nbsp;Dina Bower,&nbsp;Samuel Courville,&nbsp;Melisa Diaz,&nbsp;Benjamin Hockman,&nbsp;Julie Huber,&nbsp;Justin Lawrence,&nbsp;Trista Vick-Majors,&nbsp;Conor A. Nixon,&nbsp;John R. Spear,&nbsp;Amanda V. Steckel,&nbsp;Anezina Solomonidou,&nbsp;Nicholas Schmerr,&nbsp;Britney Schmidt,&nbsp;Matthew O. Schrenk,&nbsp;Lauren Seyler,&nbsp;Amy R. Smith,&nbsp;Catherine C. Walker,&nbsp;Patrick Whelley,&nbsp;Natalie Wolfenbarger,&nbsp;Steven D. Vance\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Field studies at terrestrial analogue sites represent an important contribution to the science of ocean worlds. The value of the science and technology investigations conducted at field analogue sites depends on the relevance of the analogue environment to the target ocean world. We accept that there are no perfect analogues for many of the unique environments represented by ocean worlds but suggest that a one-to-one matching of environmental characteristics and conditions is not crucial to the success or impact of the work. Instead, we must determine which processes and parameters are required to map directly to the target ocean world environment with high fidelity to address the science question. In this review paper, we discuss the outcomes of a workshop aimed at developing a new framework for evaluating the suitability of analogue field locations for ocean worlds research. Here we present a two-step approach to (a) identify the most crucial processes and parameters associated with a given science question and (b) assess the fidelity of these processes and parameters at a proposed field site to those expected for the target ocean world. We demonstrate this approach in a test case evaluating three types of ocean world analogue environments with respect to a science question. The consensus document presented here equips veteran and new investigators with valuable tools to better assess and justify their analogue site selections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008803\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008803\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在陆地模拟地点进行的实地研究是对海洋世界科学的重要贡献。在野外模拟地点进行的科学和技术调查的价值取决于模拟环境与目标海洋世界的相关性。我们承认,对于海洋世界所代表的许多独特环境来说,没有完美的类似物,但我们认为,环境特征和条件的一对一匹配对这项工作的成功或影响并不重要。相反,我们必须确定哪些过程和参数需要以高保真度直接映射到目标海洋世界环境,以解决科学问题。在这篇综述文章中,我们讨论了一个研讨会的成果,该研讨会旨在开发一个评估海洋世界研究模拟场位置适用性的新框架。在这里,我们提出了一种两步方法:(a)确定与给定科学问题相关的最关键过程和参数;(b)评估这些过程和参数在拟议的野外地点与目标海洋世界的预期过程和参数的保真度。我们在一个测试用例中演示了这种方法,该测试用例评估了关于科学问题的三种类型的海洋世界模拟环境。这里提出的共识文件为资深和新调查人员提供了宝贵的工具,以更好地评估和证明他们的模拟地点选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds

A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds

A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds

A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds

A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Terrestrial Analogue Field Sites for Ocean Worlds

Field studies at terrestrial analogue sites represent an important contribution to the science of ocean worlds. The value of the science and technology investigations conducted at field analogue sites depends on the relevance of the analogue environment to the target ocean world. We accept that there are no perfect analogues for many of the unique environments represented by ocean worlds but suggest that a one-to-one matching of environmental characteristics and conditions is not crucial to the success or impact of the work. Instead, we must determine which processes and parameters are required to map directly to the target ocean world environment with high fidelity to address the science question. In this review paper, we discuss the outcomes of a workshop aimed at developing a new framework for evaluating the suitability of analogue field locations for ocean worlds research. Here we present a two-step approach to (a) identify the most crucial processes and parameters associated with a given science question and (b) assess the fidelity of these processes and parameters at a proposed field site to those expected for the target ocean world. We demonstrate this approach in a test case evaluating three types of ocean world analogue environments with respect to a science question. The consensus document presented here equips veteran and new investigators with valuable tools to better assess and justify their analogue site selections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信