金刚石管钻基体中天然金刚石晶粒尺寸和机械强度对钻削非金属材料性能的影响

IF 0.6 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS
V. P. Umansky, V. P. Krasovskyy, O. O. Bashchenko
{"title":"金刚石管钻基体中天然金刚石晶粒尺寸和机械强度对钻削非金属材料性能的影响","authors":"V. P. Umansky,&nbsp;V. P. Krasovskyy,&nbsp;O. O. Bashchenko","doi":"10.1007/s11106-025-00499-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Six diamond tube drills were fabricated by vacuum impregnation using cutting grains of natural diamonds of grade A1 with grain sizes of 250/200, 315/250, 500/400, 800/600, 1000/800, and 1200/1000 μm. For comparative analysis, three drills were produced with synthetic diamonds of grades AS32 500/400, AS400 315/250, and AS400 500/400 (DSTU 3292–95). To ensure reliable fixation in the tool body, diamond grains coated with molybdenum and copper were embedded in a Cu–15 wt.% Sn matrix with added fillers (5 wt.% ultrafine diamond powder of grade ASM 1/0 and molybdenum). The compressive strength of the diamond grains was evaluated. The paper presents results from comparative laboratory tests of the diamond drills in marble, granite, and silicon carbide-based abrasive stone. Performance characteristics—drilling speed and drill wear—were studied as functions of the natural diamond grade used. The drilling speed depended on the size of the diamond grains. The lowest drilling speeds (3.52, 6.83, and 23.1 mm/min for granite, marble, and abrasive stone) were observed in drills equipped with small (A1 250/200 μm) and weak (50 N) diamond grains. When larger (A1 1200/1000 μm) and stronger (350 N) diamond grains were used, the drilling speed increased significantly (by approximately 4, 3.2, and 3.8 times) to 14.07, 22.1, and 87.99 mm/min for granite, marble, and abrasive stone, respectively. The lowest drilling speed observed in granite with all tested drills was due to its high hardness, being approximately twice that of marble. However, despite even greater hardness of silicon carbide, forming the base of the abrasive stone, the drilling speed remained high. When marble was drilled with tools containing the smallest diamond grains (A1 250/200 μm), their wear amounted to 0.0139 g. For harder materials (granite and abrasive stone), tool wear increased significantly (by factors of 41 and 48), reaching 0.5701 and 0.6665 g. With increasing grain size and compressive strength of the natural diamond grains, drill wear decreased, by factors of approximately 8, 317, and 14 for marble, granite, and abrasive stone. The greatest reduction in wear was recorded for granite. As a result, drills equipped with large and strong diamond grains (A1 1000/800 and A1 1200/1000) exhibited similarly minimal wear in the drilling of marble and granite: 0.0036 and 0.0018 g for granite and 0.0035 and 0.0017 g for marble.</p>","PeriodicalId":742,"journal":{"name":"Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics","volume":"63 11-12","pages":"735 - 741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the Size and Mechanical Strength of Natural Diamond Grains in the Matrix of Diamond Tube Drills on Their Performances in the Drilling of Selected Nonmetallic Materials\",\"authors\":\"V. P. Umansky,&nbsp;V. P. Krasovskyy,&nbsp;O. O. Bashchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11106-025-00499-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Six diamond tube drills were fabricated by vacuum impregnation using cutting grains of natural diamonds of grade A1 with grain sizes of 250/200, 315/250, 500/400, 800/600, 1000/800, and 1200/1000 μm. For comparative analysis, three drills were produced with synthetic diamonds of grades AS32 500/400, AS400 315/250, and AS400 500/400 (DSTU 3292–95). To ensure reliable fixation in the tool body, diamond grains coated with molybdenum and copper were embedded in a Cu–15 wt.% Sn matrix with added fillers (5 wt.% ultrafine diamond powder of grade ASM 1/0 and molybdenum). The compressive strength of the diamond grains was evaluated. The paper presents results from comparative laboratory tests of the diamond drills in marble, granite, and silicon carbide-based abrasive stone. Performance characteristics—drilling speed and drill wear—were studied as functions of the natural diamond grade used. The drilling speed depended on the size of the diamond grains. The lowest drilling speeds (3.52, 6.83, and 23.1 mm/min for granite, marble, and abrasive stone) were observed in drills equipped with small (A1 250/200 μm) and weak (50 N) diamond grains. When larger (A1 1200/1000 μm) and stronger (350 N) diamond grains were used, the drilling speed increased significantly (by approximately 4, 3.2, and 3.8 times) to 14.07, 22.1, and 87.99 mm/min for granite, marble, and abrasive stone, respectively. The lowest drilling speed observed in granite with all tested drills was due to its high hardness, being approximately twice that of marble. However, despite even greater hardness of silicon carbide, forming the base of the abrasive stone, the drilling speed remained high. When marble was drilled with tools containing the smallest diamond grains (A1 250/200 μm), their wear amounted to 0.0139 g. For harder materials (granite and abrasive stone), tool wear increased significantly (by factors of 41 and 48), reaching 0.5701 and 0.6665 g. With increasing grain size and compressive strength of the natural diamond grains, drill wear decreased, by factors of approximately 8, 317, and 14 for marble, granite, and abrasive stone. The greatest reduction in wear was recorded for granite. As a result, drills equipped with large and strong diamond grains (A1 1000/800 and A1 1200/1000) exhibited similarly minimal wear in the drilling of marble and granite: 0.0036 and 0.0018 g for granite and 0.0035 and 0.0017 g for marble.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics\",\"volume\":\"63 11-12\",\"pages\":\"735 - 741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11106-025-00499-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11106-025-00499-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用真空浸渍法制备了6颗A1级天然金刚石管钻,分别为250/200、315/250、500/400、800/600、1000/800和1200/1000 μm。为了进行对比分析,用AS32 500/400、AS400 315/250和AS400 500/400 (DSTU 3292-95)的合成金刚石生产了三种钻头。为了确保在工具体内的可靠固定,将涂有钼和铜的金刚石颗粒嵌入cu - 15wt .% Sn基体中,并添加填料(5wt .% ASM 1/0级超细金刚石粉和钼)。对金刚石颗粒的抗压强度进行了评价。本文介绍了金刚石钻头在大理石、花岗岩和碳化硅基磨料上的对比实验室测试结果。研究了钻速和钻磨损随天然金刚石等级的变化规律。钻速取决于金刚石颗粒的大小。较小(A1 250/200 μm)和较弱(50 N)金刚石颗粒的钻头钻速最低(花岗岩、大理石和磨料分别为3.52、6.83和23.1 mm/min)。当使用更大的(A1 1200/1000 μm)和更强的(350 N)金刚石颗粒时,花岗岩、大理石和磨料石的钻进速度分别达到14.07、22.1和87.99 mm/min,分别显著提高了约4倍、3.2倍和3.8倍。在所有测试的钻头中,在花岗岩中观察到的最低钻孔速度是由于其高硬度,大约是大理石的两倍。然而,尽管形成磨料的碳化硅硬度更高,但钻孔速度仍然很高。用含有最小金刚石颗粒(A1 250/200 μm)的工具钻凿大理石时,其磨损量为0.0139 g。对于较硬的材料(花岗岩和磨料石),刀具磨损明显增加(以41和48的倍数),达到0.5701和0.6665 g。随着天然金刚石颗粒尺寸和抗压强度的增加,钻头磨损降低,大理石、花岗岩和磨料石的磨损率分别为8、317和14。花岗岩的磨损减少幅度最大。因此,配备大而强的金刚石颗粒(A1 1000/800和A1 1200/1000)的钻头在大理石和花岗岩的钻孔中表现出类似的最小磨损:花岗岩为0.0036和0.0018 g,大理石为0.0035和0.0017 g。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of the Size and Mechanical Strength of Natural Diamond Grains in the Matrix of Diamond Tube Drills on Their Performances in the Drilling of Selected Nonmetallic Materials

Influence of the Size and Mechanical Strength of Natural Diamond Grains in the Matrix of Diamond Tube Drills on Their Performances in the Drilling of Selected Nonmetallic Materials

Influence of the Size and Mechanical Strength of Natural Diamond Grains in the Matrix of Diamond Tube Drills on Their Performances in the Drilling of Selected Nonmetallic Materials

Six diamond tube drills were fabricated by vacuum impregnation using cutting grains of natural diamonds of grade A1 with grain sizes of 250/200, 315/250, 500/400, 800/600, 1000/800, and 1200/1000 μm. For comparative analysis, three drills were produced with synthetic diamonds of grades AS32 500/400, AS400 315/250, and AS400 500/400 (DSTU 3292–95). To ensure reliable fixation in the tool body, diamond grains coated with molybdenum and copper were embedded in a Cu–15 wt.% Sn matrix with added fillers (5 wt.% ultrafine diamond powder of grade ASM 1/0 and molybdenum). The compressive strength of the diamond grains was evaluated. The paper presents results from comparative laboratory tests of the diamond drills in marble, granite, and silicon carbide-based abrasive stone. Performance characteristics—drilling speed and drill wear—were studied as functions of the natural diamond grade used. The drilling speed depended on the size of the diamond grains. The lowest drilling speeds (3.52, 6.83, and 23.1 mm/min for granite, marble, and abrasive stone) were observed in drills equipped with small (A1 250/200 μm) and weak (50 N) diamond grains. When larger (A1 1200/1000 μm) and stronger (350 N) diamond grains were used, the drilling speed increased significantly (by approximately 4, 3.2, and 3.8 times) to 14.07, 22.1, and 87.99 mm/min for granite, marble, and abrasive stone, respectively. The lowest drilling speed observed in granite with all tested drills was due to its high hardness, being approximately twice that of marble. However, despite even greater hardness of silicon carbide, forming the base of the abrasive stone, the drilling speed remained high. When marble was drilled with tools containing the smallest diamond grains (A1 250/200 μm), their wear amounted to 0.0139 g. For harder materials (granite and abrasive stone), tool wear increased significantly (by factors of 41 and 48), reaching 0.5701 and 0.6665 g. With increasing grain size and compressive strength of the natural diamond grains, drill wear decreased, by factors of approximately 8, 317, and 14 for marble, granite, and abrasive stone. The greatest reduction in wear was recorded for granite. As a result, drills equipped with large and strong diamond grains (A1 1000/800 and A1 1200/1000) exhibited similarly minimal wear in the drilling of marble and granite: 0.0036 and 0.0018 g for granite and 0.0035 and 0.0017 g for marble.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics
Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics 工程技术-材料科学:硅酸盐
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics covers topics of the theory, manufacturing technology, and properties of powder; technology of forming processes; the technology of sintering, heat treatment, and thermo-chemical treatment; properties of sintered materials; and testing methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信