Yanfei Lu, Min Wu, Zhenbin Wei, Lingling Shi, Yongrong Lai, Rongrong Liu
{"title":"西罗莫司加低暴露钙调磷酸酶抑制剂作为钙调磷酸酶抑制剂不耐受受体移植物抗宿主病预防的替代方法:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Yanfei Lu, Min Wu, Zhenbin Wei, Lingling Shi, Yongrong Lai, Rongrong Liu","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low-exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI-intolerant recipients undergoing allo-HSCT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo-HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow-up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non-relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse-related deaths. The alternative regimen was well-tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>For allo-HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low-exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sirolimus Plus Low-Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Yanfei Lu, Min Wu, Zhenbin Wei, Lingling Shi, Yongrong Lai, Rongrong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low-exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI-intolerant recipients undergoing allo-HSCT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo-HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow-up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non-relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse-related deaths. The alternative regimen was well-tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>For allo-HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low-exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70306\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sirolimus Plus Low-Exposure Calcineurin Inhibitors as an Alternative Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Calcineurin Inhibitor-Intolerant Recipients: A Retrospective Study
Background
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major barrier to long-term survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the cornerstone of GvHD prophylaxis, some patients cannot tolerate them, creating a critical need for alternative strategies.
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sirolimus plus low-exposure CNIs as an alternative GvHD prophylaxis in CNI-intolerant recipients undergoing allo-HSCT.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 16 allo-HSCT recipients who received alternative GvHD prophylaxis due to CNI intolerance, evaluating GvHD incidence, survival and relapse outcomes, infectious complications, and immune reconstitution.
Results
The median time to regimen initiation was 27.5 days (range, −2 to 114 days), and the median treatment duration was 53 days (range, 14–319 days). Only one patient (6.3%) experienced grade 2 acute GvHD, and none developed grade 3–4 acute GvHD. No cases of chronic GvHD were observed in the 15 evaluable patients. Over a median follow-up of 271 days (range, 58–505 days), one non-relapse mortality and three relapses (18.7%) occurred, with no relapse-related deaths. The alternative regimen was well-tolerated with manageable infections and, importantly, did not impair early T, B, or NK cell reconstitution.
Conclusion
For allo-HSCT recipients with CNI intolerance, this study provides the first evaluation of sirolimus combined with low-exposure CNIs as a GvHD prophylaxis. Our findings suggest this regimen is a promising and feasible alternative, although validation in larger, prospective studies is warranted.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.