Donanemab在早期症状性阿尔茨海默病患者中的免疫原性

IF 6.8 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Garrett R. Mullins, Paul Ardayfio, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Greg Anglin, Jason Bailey, Laiyi Chua, Jennifer A. Zimmer, Cynthia D. Evans, Emel Serap Monkul Nery, Hong Wang, Rashna Khanna, Dawn A. Brooks, John R. Sims
{"title":"Donanemab在早期症状性阿尔茨海默病患者中的免疫原性","authors":"Garrett R. Mullins,&nbsp;Paul Ardayfio,&nbsp;Ivelina Gueorguieva,&nbsp;Greg Anglin,&nbsp;Jason Bailey,&nbsp;Laiyi Chua,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Zimmer,&nbsp;Cynthia D. Evans,&nbsp;Emel Serap Monkul Nery,&nbsp;Hong Wang,&nbsp;Rashna Khanna,&nbsp;Dawn A. Brooks,&nbsp;John R. Sims","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.</li>\n \n <li>TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.</li>\n \n <li>All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.</li>\n \n <li>However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease\",\"authors\":\"Garrett R. Mullins,&nbsp;Paul Ardayfio,&nbsp;Ivelina Gueorguieva,&nbsp;Greg Anglin,&nbsp;Jason Bailey,&nbsp;Laiyi Chua,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Zimmer,&nbsp;Cynthia D. Evans,&nbsp;Emel Serap Monkul Nery,&nbsp;Hong Wang,&nbsp;Rashna Khanna,&nbsp;Dawn A. Brooks,&nbsp;John R. Sims\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/trc2.70149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.</li>\\n \\n <li>TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.</li>\\n \\n <li>All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.</li>\\n \\n <li>However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Donanemab是一种免疫球蛋白G1抗体,靶向成熟斑块中存在的n端截断形式的β淀粉样蛋白。在两项关键的临床试验中,对多南耐单抗治疗参与者体内的治疗涌现(TE)抗药物抗体(ADAs)进行了量化,并评估了TE ADAs对多南耐单抗药代动力学、疗效和安全性的影响。方法数据来自2期TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403)和3期TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2试验(NCT04437511)。符合条件的参与者以1:1的比例随机分配到donanemab(前三次剂量为700毫克,之后为1400毫克)或安慰剂,每4周静脉注射一次,直至72周。可评估TE ADA的参与者有非缺失的基线ADA结果和≥1个非缺失的基线后ADA结果。评估TE - ADA的发生率和滴度对药代动力学、淀粉样斑块减少、临床疗效(通过综合阿尔茨海默病评定量表[iADRS]评分和临床痴呆评定量表盒子总和[CDR-SB]从基线变化来衡量)和安全性的影响。结果:在922名可评估TE ADA的donanemab治疗参与者中,56名(6.1%)在基线时检测到ADA, 812名(88.1%)TE ADA阳性。Donanemab清除率随ADA滴度的对数线性增加;然而,滴度不影响最大donanemab浓度。无论滴度如何,与安慰剂相比,多纳耐单抗显著降低了淀粉样斑块水平(P < 0.001)。ADA的存在或滴度与adrs或CDR-SB的多奈单抗疗效没有关联。984名donanemab治疗的参与者中有84名(8.5%)和999名安慰剂治疗的参与者中有4名(0.4%)报告了输液相关反应(IRRs)。所有报告立即发生不良反应的donanemab治疗参与者在研究期间的某个时间点都出现了ADAs;然而,90.5%的TE ada阳性参与者没有出现IRRs。大多数参与者TE ADA呈阳性。TE ADAs增加了donanemab清除率,但对斑块减少或疗效没有临床意义的影响。虽然所有报告有不良反应的参与者在研究期间的某个时候都出现了不良反应,但大多数有不良反应的参与者没有出现不良反应。在关键试验中,大多数接受donanemab治疗的参与者是治疗后出现的抗药物抗体(TE ADA)阳性。TE ADAs增加了donanemab清除率,但不影响斑块减少/疗效。所有报告输注相关反应(IRRs)的参与者在研究期间的某个时刻都出现了ADAs。然而,大多数ADAs患者没有经历irs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease

INTRODUCTION

Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.

METHODS

Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (P < 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.

DISCUSSION

Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.

Highlights

  • In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.
  • TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.
  • All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.
  • However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信