Garrett R. Mullins, Paul Ardayfio, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Greg Anglin, Jason Bailey, Laiyi Chua, Jennifer A. Zimmer, Cynthia D. Evans, Emel Serap Monkul Nery, Hong Wang, Rashna Khanna, Dawn A. Brooks, John R. Sims
{"title":"Donanemab在早期症状性阿尔茨海默病患者中的免疫原性","authors":"Garrett R. Mullins, Paul Ardayfio, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Greg Anglin, Jason Bailey, Laiyi Chua, Jennifer A. Zimmer, Cynthia D. Evans, Emel Serap Monkul Nery, Hong Wang, Rashna Khanna, Dawn A. Brooks, John R. Sims","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.</li>\n \n <li>TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.</li>\n \n <li>All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.</li>\n \n <li>However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease\",\"authors\":\"Garrett R. Mullins, Paul Ardayfio, Ivelina Gueorguieva, Greg Anglin, Jason Bailey, Laiyi Chua, Jennifer A. Zimmer, Cynthia D. Evans, Emel Serap Monkul Nery, Hong Wang, Rashna Khanna, Dawn A. Brooks, John R. Sims\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/trc2.70149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> METHODS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (<i>P</i> < 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Highlights</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.</li>\\n \\n <li>TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.</li>\\n \\n <li>All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.</li>\\n \\n <li>However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Donanemab immunogenicity in participants with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease
INTRODUCTION
Donanemab is an immunoglobulin G1 antibody that targets an N-terminal truncated form of amyloid beta present in mature plaques. Treatment-emergent (TE) anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were quantified in donanemab-treated participants from two pivotal clinical trials, and effects of TE ADAs on donanemab pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were assessed.
METHODS
Data were pooled from the phase 2 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ (NCT03367403) and phase 3 TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trials (NCT04437511). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to donanemab (700 mg for the first three doses, 1400 mg thereafter) or placebo intravenously every 4 weeks up to 72 weeks. TE ADA-evaluable participants had a non-missing baseline ADA result and ≥ 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA result. TE ADA incidence and effect of titer on pharmacokinetics, amyloid plaque reduction, clinical efficacy (measured by change from baseline of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale [iADRS] score and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes [CDR-SB]), and safety were assessed.
RESULTS
Of 922 TE ADA-evaluable donanemab-treated participants, 56 (6.1%) had ADAs detected at baseline, and 812 (88.1%) were TE ADA positive. Donanemab clearance increased linearly with logarithm of ADA titer; however, titer did not affect maximum donanemab concentration. Amyloid plaque level was significantly reduced with donanemab versus placebo, irrespective of titer (P < 0.001 for all). No association was found between ADA presence or titer and donanemab efficacy by iADRS or CDR-SB. Eighty-four of 984 (8.5%) donanemab-treated participants and 4 of 999 (0.4%) placebo-treated participants reported infusion-related reactions (IRRs). All donanemab-treated participants reporting immediate IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study; however, 90.5% of TE ADA-positive participants did not experience IRRs.
DISCUSSION
Most participants were TE ADA positive. TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not have clinically meaningful impact on plaque reduction or efficacy. While all participants reporting IRRs developed ADAs at some point during the study, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.
Highlights
In pivotal trials, most donanemab-treated participants were treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody (TE ADA) positive.
TE ADAs increased donanemab clearance but did not impact plaque reduction/efficacy.
All participants reporting infusion-related reactions (IRRs) developed ADAs at some point during the study.
However, the majority of participants with ADAs did not experience IRRs.
期刊介绍:
Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.