基于深度强化学习的多智能体自主协同驾驶策略研究

IF 2.5 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ahmed Alzubaidi, Ameena S. Al-Sumaiti, Majid Khonji
{"title":"基于深度强化学习的多智能体自主协同驾驶策略研究","authors":"Ahmed Alzubaidi,&nbsp;Ameena S. Al-Sumaiti,&nbsp;Majid Khonji","doi":"10.1049/itr2.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has been increasingly applied in training cooperative decision models for connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Despite the success they have demonstrated, they are bound to inherit issues that deep learning models suffer, such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks which is the focus of this study. Consequently, this paper aims to assess and enhance the robustness of MARL-trained cooperative policies used by CAVs, in terms of their resilience to adversarial behavior encountered during deployment. First, a specific existing cooperative policy was identified to be the victim policy, deployed in an on-ramp merging road scenario. Second, two adversarial policies, namely collision adversary (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$adv_c$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) and speed adversary (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$adv_s$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>), were developed and trained to disrupt the performance of the victim policy. The adversarial policies significantly impacted the victim policy, increasing the collision rate to 62% and decreasing the average speed from 25 m/s to 21.73 m/s. Finally, several adversarial training approaches were developed, producing more robust cooperative policies against adversarial scenarios, by significantly bolstering road safety in adversarial conditions. The collision rate was cut by half against <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$adv_c$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, whereas, 0% collision scored in the face of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>a</mi>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mi>s</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$adv_s$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50381,"journal":{"name":"IET Intelligent Transport Systems","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/itr2.70066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning Attacks on Multi-Agent Autonomous Cooperative Driving Policies\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alzubaidi,&nbsp;Ameena S. Al-Sumaiti,&nbsp;Majid Khonji\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/itr2.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has been increasingly applied in training cooperative decision models for connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Despite the success they have demonstrated, they are bound to inherit issues that deep learning models suffer, such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks which is the focus of this study. Consequently, this paper aims to assess and enhance the robustness of MARL-trained cooperative policies used by CAVs, in terms of their resilience to adversarial behavior encountered during deployment. First, a specific existing cooperative policy was identified to be the victim policy, deployed in an on-ramp merging road scenario. Second, two adversarial policies, namely collision adversary (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$adv_c$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) and speed adversary (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$adv_s$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>), were developed and trained to disrupt the performance of the victim policy. The adversarial policies significantly impacted the victim policy, increasing the collision rate to 62% and decreasing the average speed from 25 m/s to 21.73 m/s. Finally, several adversarial training approaches were developed, producing more robust cooperative policies against adversarial scenarios, by significantly bolstering road safety in adversarial conditions. The collision rate was cut by half against <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$adv_c$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, whereas, 0% collision scored in the face of <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>a</mi>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$adv_s$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Intelligent Transport Systems\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/itr2.70066\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Intelligent Transport Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/itr2.70066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Intelligent Transport Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/itr2.70066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,多智能体强化学习(MARL)越来越多地应用于网联自动驾驶汽车的协同决策模型训练中。尽管他们已经证明了成功,但他们一定会继承深度学习模型所遭受的问题,例如对抗性攻击的脆弱性,这是本研究的重点。因此,本文旨在评估和增强cav使用的mar训练的合作策略的鲁棒性,就其在部署过程中遇到的对抗行为的弹性而言。首先,将一个特定的现有合作策略确定为受害者策略,部署在入口匝道合并道路场景中。第二,两种敌对的政策,即碰撞对手(adv c$ adv_c$)和速度对手(adv s$ adv_s$)),是为了破坏受害者政策的执行而制定和培训的。对抗策略显著影响了受害者策略,使碰撞率增加到62%,平均速度从25 m/s降低到21.73 m/s。最后,开发了几种对抗性训练方法,通过显著增强对抗性条件下的道路安全,产生了针对对抗性情景的更强大的合作政策。碰撞率比dv c$ adv_c$降低了一半,而,面对一个dv s$ adv_s$,碰撞得分为0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning Attacks on Multi-Agent Autonomous Cooperative Driving Policies

Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning Attacks on Multi-Agent Autonomous Cooperative Driving Policies

Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning Attacks on Multi-Agent Autonomous Cooperative Driving Policies

Adversarial Deep Reinforcement Learning Attacks on Multi-Agent Autonomous Cooperative Driving Policies

In recent years, multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has been increasingly applied in training cooperative decision models for connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Despite the success they have demonstrated, they are bound to inherit issues that deep learning models suffer, such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks which is the focus of this study. Consequently, this paper aims to assess and enhance the robustness of MARL-trained cooperative policies used by CAVs, in terms of their resilience to adversarial behavior encountered during deployment. First, a specific existing cooperative policy was identified to be the victim policy, deployed in an on-ramp merging road scenario. Second, two adversarial policies, namely collision adversary ( a d v c $adv_c$ ) and speed adversary ( a d v s $adv_s$ ), were developed and trained to disrupt the performance of the victim policy. The adversarial policies significantly impacted the victim policy, increasing the collision rate to 62% and decreasing the average speed from 25 m/s to 21.73 m/s. Finally, several adversarial training approaches were developed, producing more robust cooperative policies against adversarial scenarios, by significantly bolstering road safety in adversarial conditions. The collision rate was cut by half against a d v c $adv_c$ , whereas, 0% collision scored in the face of a d v s $adv_s$ .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
IET Intelligent Transport Systems 工程技术-运输科技
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: IET Intelligent Transport Systems is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to research into the practical applications of ITS and infrastructures. The scope of the journal includes the following: Sustainable traffic solutions Deployments with enabling technologies Pervasive monitoring Applications; demonstrations and evaluation Economic and behavioural analyses of ITS services and scenario Data Integration and analytics Information collection and processing; image processing applications in ITS ITS aspects of electric vehicles Autonomous vehicles; connected vehicle systems; In-vehicle ITS, safety and vulnerable road user aspects Mobility as a service systems Traffic management and control Public transport systems technologies Fleet and public transport logistics Emergency and incident management Demand management and electronic payment systems Traffic related air pollution management Policy and institutional issues Interoperability, standards and architectures Funding scenarios Enforcement Human machine interaction Education, training and outreach Current Special Issue Call for papers: Intelligent Transportation Systems in Smart Cities for Sustainable Environment - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_ITSSCSE.pdf Sustainably Intelligent Mobility (SIM) - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_SIM.pdf Traffic Theory and Modelling in the Era of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (in collaboration with World Congress for Transport Research, WCTR 2019) - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_ITS_CFP_WCTR.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信