乳腺癌药物输送系统的疗效:临床前动物研究的荟萃分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Arlinda Daka Grapci, Pranvera Breznica Selmani, Blerina Koshi, Ibadete Bytyçi, Rozafa Koliqi
{"title":"乳腺癌药物输送系统的疗效:临床前动物研究的荟萃分析","authors":"Arlinda Daka Grapci,&nbsp;Pranvera Breznica Selmani,&nbsp;Blerina Koshi,&nbsp;Ibadete Bytyçi,&nbsp;Rozafa Koliqi","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-10069-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in women, with conventional chemotherapy facing challenges like limited efficacy and high toxicity. Drug delivery systems (DDS) offer promising alternatives by enhancing drug targeting, increasing bioavailability, and minimizing adverse effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of DDS in inhibiting tumor growth in preclinical breast cancer models, comparing targeted and non-targeted approaches, as well as the most common DDS platforms.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search identified 62 preclinical studies on the efficacy of drug delivery systems (DDS) in breast cancer treatment. Key variables such as DDS type, chemotherapeutic agents, targeting strategies, and administration routes were analyzed, with subgroup analyses based on targeting approaches and administration methods. A risk of bias assessment was also performed to evaluate study quality.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Drug delivery systems (DDS) significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition compared to free drugs, with targeted DDS showing superior efficacy. Liposomes and epirubicin-loaded DDS exhibited the greatest tumor suppression, and aptamers were the most effective targeting ligands. Intraperitoneal administration showed a slight advantage over intravenous delivery. Methodological flaws, such as inadequate randomization and blinding, were noted in several studies.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>DDS, particularly with targeted delivery strategies, significantly improve chemotherapeutic efficacy in preclinical breast cancer models. Liposomes, epirubicin-loaded DDS, and aptamers are promising, but variability in study designs necessitates more rigorous and standardized methodologies for better translational relevance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Drug Delivery Systems in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Animal Studies\",\"authors\":\"Arlinda Daka Grapci,&nbsp;Pranvera Breznica Selmani,&nbsp;Blerina Koshi,&nbsp;Ibadete Bytyçi,&nbsp;Rozafa Koliqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-10069-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in women, with conventional chemotherapy facing challenges like limited efficacy and high toxicity. Drug delivery systems (DDS) offer promising alternatives by enhancing drug targeting, increasing bioavailability, and minimizing adverse effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of DDS in inhibiting tumor growth in preclinical breast cancer models, comparing targeted and non-targeted approaches, as well as the most common DDS platforms.</p><h3>Method</h3><p>A comprehensive literature search identified 62 preclinical studies on the efficacy of drug delivery systems (DDS) in breast cancer treatment. Key variables such as DDS type, chemotherapeutic agents, targeting strategies, and administration routes were analyzed, with subgroup analyses based on targeting approaches and administration methods. A risk of bias assessment was also performed to evaluate study quality.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Drug delivery systems (DDS) significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition compared to free drugs, with targeted DDS showing superior efficacy. Liposomes and epirubicin-loaded DDS exhibited the greatest tumor suppression, and aptamers were the most effective targeting ligands. Intraperitoneal administration showed a slight advantage over intravenous delivery. Methodological flaws, such as inadequate randomization and blinding, were noted in several studies.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>DDS, particularly with targeted delivery strategies, significantly improve chemotherapeutic efficacy in preclinical breast cancer models. Liposomes, epirubicin-loaded DDS, and aptamers are promising, but variability in study designs necessitates more rigorous and standardized methodologies for better translational relevance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10069-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10069-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌仍然是女性癌症相关死亡的主要原因,传统化疗面临着疗效有限和高毒性等挑战。药物传递系统(DDS)通过增强药物靶向性、提高生物利用度和减少不良反应提供了有希望的替代方案。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了DDS在临床前乳腺癌模型中抑制肿瘤生长的有效性,比较了靶向和非靶向方法以及最常见的DDS平台。方法综合文献检索了62项关于药物传递系统(DDS)治疗乳腺癌疗效的临床前研究。分析DDS类型、化疗药物、靶向策略、给药途径等关键变量,并根据靶向途径和给药方式进行亚组分析。还进行了偏倚风险评估以评估研究质量。结果与游离药物相比,药物传递系统(DDS)可显著增强肿瘤生长抑制作用,其中靶向DDS效果更佳。脂质体和表柔比星负载的DDS表现出最大的肿瘤抑制作用,适配体是最有效的靶向配体。腹腔给药优于静脉给药。在一些研究中发现了方法学上的缺陷,如不充分的随机化和盲法。结论sdds,特别是靶向给药策略,可显著提高临床前乳腺癌模型的化疗疗效。脂质体、表柔比星负载的DDS和适体是很有前途的,但研究设计的可变性需要更严格和标准化的方法,以获得更好的翻译相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Drug Delivery Systems in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Animal Studies

Purpose

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in women, with conventional chemotherapy facing challenges like limited efficacy and high toxicity. Drug delivery systems (DDS) offer promising alternatives by enhancing drug targeting, increasing bioavailability, and minimizing adverse effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of DDS in inhibiting tumor growth in preclinical breast cancer models, comparing targeted and non-targeted approaches, as well as the most common DDS platforms.

Method

A comprehensive literature search identified 62 preclinical studies on the efficacy of drug delivery systems (DDS) in breast cancer treatment. Key variables such as DDS type, chemotherapeutic agents, targeting strategies, and administration routes were analyzed, with subgroup analyses based on targeting approaches and administration methods. A risk of bias assessment was also performed to evaluate study quality.

Results

Drug delivery systems (DDS) significantly enhanced tumor growth inhibition compared to free drugs, with targeted DDS showing superior efficacy. Liposomes and epirubicin-loaded DDS exhibited the greatest tumor suppression, and aptamers were the most effective targeting ligands. Intraperitoneal administration showed a slight advantage over intravenous delivery. Methodological flaws, such as inadequate randomization and blinding, were noted in several studies.

Conclusions

DDS, particularly with targeted delivery strategies, significantly improve chemotherapeutic efficacy in preclinical breast cancer models. Liposomes, epirubicin-loaded DDS, and aptamers are promising, but variability in study designs necessitates more rigorous and standardized methodologies for better translational relevance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信