企业社会责任创新与企业社会责任利他主义——一个企业分类模型

IF 5.3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Saju Jose , Krishna Venkitachalam
{"title":"企业社会责任创新与企业社会责任利他主义——一个企业分类模型","authors":"Saju Jose ,&nbsp;Krishna Venkitachalam","doi":"10.1016/j.ijis.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relational construct between corporate social responsibility (CSR) altruism and CSR innovation has been under-studied in the literature. By examining firms’ innovation practices and CSR altruism level, this study introduces a conceptual model for categorizing firms. The study proposes that firms can be divided into four groups (trendsetters, strategists, copycats, and actors) based on their level of CSR altruism and innovation practices. The theoretical underpinning of the model is based on stakeholder and institutional theories. The proposed model suggests that firms have diverse perspectives on CSR innovation. Some firms perceive it as a means to enhance profits, some question its significance, and some emulate others by following emerging CSR trends. The model is anticipated to offer insights into the conflicting evidence found in the CSR and innovation literature and encourage further empirical investigation. Additionally, policymakers can acknowledge firms' underlying innovation and CSR motivation within each category.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36449,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 301-311"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CSR innovation and CSR altruism – A model of firm classification\",\"authors\":\"Saju Jose ,&nbsp;Krishna Venkitachalam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijis.2025.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The relational construct between corporate social responsibility (CSR) altruism and CSR innovation has been under-studied in the literature. By examining firms’ innovation practices and CSR altruism level, this study introduces a conceptual model for categorizing firms. The study proposes that firms can be divided into four groups (trendsetters, strategists, copycats, and actors) based on their level of CSR altruism and innovation practices. The theoretical underpinning of the model is based on stakeholder and institutional theories. The proposed model suggests that firms have diverse perspectives on CSR innovation. Some firms perceive it as a means to enhance profits, some question its significance, and some emulate others by following emerging CSR trends. The model is anticipated to offer insights into the conflicting evidence found in the CSR and innovation literature and encourage further empirical investigation. Additionally, policymakers can acknowledge firms' underlying innovation and CSR motivation within each category.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 301-311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248725000281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248725000281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献对企业社会责任利他主义与企业社会责任创新之间的关系结构研究较少。本文通过考察企业的创新实践和企业社会责任利他主义水平,引入了企业分类的概念模型。该研究提出,根据企业社会责任利他主义和创新实践的水平,可以将企业分为四类(趋势引领者、战略家、模仿者和行动者)。该模型的理论基础是利益相关者理论和制度理论。该模型表明,企业对企业社会责任创新有不同的看法。一些公司将其视为提高利润的一种手段,一些公司质疑其重要性,还有一些公司效仿其他公司,跟随新兴的企业社会责任趋势。该模型有望为企业社会责任和创新文献中发现的相互矛盾的证据提供见解,并鼓励进一步的实证调查。此外,决策者可以承认企业在每个类别中的潜在创新和企业社会责任动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CSR innovation and CSR altruism – A model of firm classification
The relational construct between corporate social responsibility (CSR) altruism and CSR innovation has been under-studied in the literature. By examining firms’ innovation practices and CSR altruism level, this study introduces a conceptual model for categorizing firms. The study proposes that firms can be divided into four groups (trendsetters, strategists, copycats, and actors) based on their level of CSR altruism and innovation practices. The theoretical underpinning of the model is based on stakeholder and institutional theories. The proposed model suggests that firms have diverse perspectives on CSR innovation. Some firms perceive it as a means to enhance profits, some question its significance, and some emulate others by following emerging CSR trends. The model is anticipated to offer insights into the conflicting evidence found in the CSR and innovation literature and encourage further empirical investigation. Additionally, policymakers can acknowledge firms' underlying innovation and CSR motivation within each category.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation Studies
International Journal of Innovation Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信