在慢性疾病的情况下,什么对人群最重要?意大利离散选择实验的结果

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Milena Vainieri , Veronica Spataro , Sabina De Rosis , Filippo Quattrone , Sabina Nuti
{"title":"在慢性疾病的情况下,什么对人群最重要?意大利离散选择实验的结果","authors":"Milena Vainieri ,&nbsp;Veronica Spataro ,&nbsp;Sabina De Rosis ,&nbsp;Filippo Quattrone ,&nbsp;Sabina Nuti","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Relational continuity, care coordination, and teamwork are widely recognized as key components of quality in primary care. This study investigates population preferences regarding organizational models of primary care, with a particular focus on the roles of general practitioners, specialists, and nurses. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted through a nationwide online cross-sectional survey, employing a full factorial experimental design with 20 randomly selected choice sets to minimize cognitive burden. The attributes examined included coordination, relational continuity, and teamwork.</div><div>Data were collected from a representative sample of 2,553 respondents across Italy in early 2021. Results underscore the centrality of teamwork (OR=1.85 in mild and 2.31 in severe chronic conditions), followed by relational continuity (OR=1.60 in mild and 1.55 in severe conditions). Coordination ranks third (OR=1.31) for mild conditions but reaches parity with relational continuity in the context of severe chronic conditions. These findings offer robust evidence of differentiated preferences based on chronic disease severity and support the design of tailored primary care models.</div><div>In conclusion, this analysis highlights the importance of incorporating coordination, relational continuity, and teamwork in the configuration of primary care services, offering policy-relevant insights for adapting delivery models to the needs of patients with varying levels of chronicity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What matters most to the population in case of chronic conditions? Results from a discrete choice experiment in Italy\",\"authors\":\"Milena Vainieri ,&nbsp;Veronica Spataro ,&nbsp;Sabina De Rosis ,&nbsp;Filippo Quattrone ,&nbsp;Sabina Nuti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Relational continuity, care coordination, and teamwork are widely recognized as key components of quality in primary care. This study investigates population preferences regarding organizational models of primary care, with a particular focus on the roles of general practitioners, specialists, and nurses. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted through a nationwide online cross-sectional survey, employing a full factorial experimental design with 20 randomly selected choice sets to minimize cognitive burden. The attributes examined included coordination, relational continuity, and teamwork.</div><div>Data were collected from a representative sample of 2,553 respondents across Italy in early 2021. Results underscore the centrality of teamwork (OR=1.85 in mild and 2.31 in severe chronic conditions), followed by relational continuity (OR=1.60 in mild and 1.55 in severe conditions). Coordination ranks third (OR=1.31) for mild conditions but reaches parity with relational continuity in the context of severe chronic conditions. These findings offer robust evidence of differentiated preferences based on chronic disease severity and support the design of tailored primary care models.</div><div>In conclusion, this analysis highlights the importance of incorporating coordination, relational continuity, and teamwork in the configuration of primary care services, offering policy-relevant insights for adapting delivery models to the needs of patients with varying levels of chronicity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001757\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关系连续性、护理协调和团队合作被广泛认为是初级保健质量的关键组成部分。本研究调查了人们对初级保健组织模式的偏好,特别关注全科医生、专家和护士的角色。离散选择实验(DCE)通过全国在线横断面调查进行,采用全因子实验设计,随机选择20个选择集,以最大限度地减少认知负担。检查的属性包括协调、关系连续性和团队合作。数据是在2021年初从意大利各地2553名受访者的代表性样本中收集的。结果强调团队合作的中心性(轻度慢性疾病OR=1.85,重度慢性疾病OR= 2.31),其次是关系连续性(轻度慢性疾病OR=1.60,重度慢性疾病OR= 1.55)。在轻度疾病中,协调性排名第三(OR=1.31),但在严重慢性疾病中,协调性与关系连续性排名相同。这些发现提供了基于慢性疾病严重程度的差异化偏好的有力证据,并支持定制初级保健模式的设计。总之,该分析强调了在初级保健服务配置中纳入协调、关系连续性和团队合作的重要性,为调整交付模式以满足不同慢性程度患者的需求提供了与政策相关的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What matters most to the population in case of chronic conditions? Results from a discrete choice experiment in Italy
Relational continuity, care coordination, and teamwork are widely recognized as key components of quality in primary care. This study investigates population preferences regarding organizational models of primary care, with a particular focus on the roles of general practitioners, specialists, and nurses. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was conducted through a nationwide online cross-sectional survey, employing a full factorial experimental design with 20 randomly selected choice sets to minimize cognitive burden. The attributes examined included coordination, relational continuity, and teamwork.
Data were collected from a representative sample of 2,553 respondents across Italy in early 2021. Results underscore the centrality of teamwork (OR=1.85 in mild and 2.31 in severe chronic conditions), followed by relational continuity (OR=1.60 in mild and 1.55 in severe conditions). Coordination ranks third (OR=1.31) for mild conditions but reaches parity with relational continuity in the context of severe chronic conditions. These findings offer robust evidence of differentiated preferences based on chronic disease severity and support the design of tailored primary care models.
In conclusion, this analysis highlights the importance of incorporating coordination, relational continuity, and teamwork in the configuration of primary care services, offering policy-relevant insights for adapting delivery models to the needs of patients with varying levels of chronicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信