泌乳高峰至中期自动短期不完全挤奶对奶牛乳房硬度、心率变异性和行为记录的影响

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Robin Joest , Jenny Stracke , Ute Müller
{"title":"泌乳高峰至中期自动短期不完全挤奶对奶牛乳房硬度、心率变异性和行为记录的影响","authors":"Robin Joest ,&nbsp;Jenny Stracke ,&nbsp;Ute Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Incomplete Milking can strategically be used to induce short-term milk yield reduction, benefiting dairy cows’ metabolism without affecting long-term productivity. However, while intermitted milking has been associated with elevated udder pressure and discomfort in dairy cows, incomplete milking´s welfare effects remain less well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of automated short-term incomplete milking on udder filling and udder firmness, as well as on the welfare of dairy cows, by assessing heart rate variability (HRV) and behavior recordings. Udder healthy, multiparous dairy cows in peak- to mid-lactation were randomly assigned to the complete milking treatment (COMP; n = 23, 95 ± 49 days in milk, lactation number 3.0 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD)) or the incomplete milking treatment (INCL; n = 23, 93 ± 46 days in milk, lactation number 2.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD)). The incomplete milking consisted of two phases: In the 1st phase, milk withdrawal was gradually reduced by 9 %/day over 5.5 days, resulting in app. 40 % reduction and was followed by 3 complete milkings. Subsequently, in the 2nd phase, the 40 % reduction was maintained consistently for further 5.5 days. Milk yield did not differ between treatments before incomplete milking (COMP: 39.1 ± 1.42 kg/day; INCL: 40.2 ± 1.66 kg/day (mean ± SEM) and a 43 % reduced milk withdrawal was effectively achieved at the end of the 1st phase and throughout the 2nd phase. In INCL cows, udder filling increased, and udder firmness before milking was elevated on average by 18 % during the 1st and by 22 % during the 2nd phase, compared to COMP cows. After milking, udder firmness was on average 33 % higher in INCL cows throughout both phases. Udder health was not affected by incomplete milking and it had no effect on HRV indices, which remained consistent between groups and over time (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). No defense behavior was observed in the milking parlor, and behavior recordings in the barn showed no differences between treatments. This study demonstrates that, even though automated short-term incomplete milking resulted in increased udder filling and firmness – suggesting elevated residual milk and internal udder pressure –, incomplete milking does not indicate adverse effects on the welfare of dairy cows based on the indicators evaluated in this study. These findings support incomplete milking as a viable management strategy for dairy cows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of automated short-term incomplete milking during peak to mid lactation on udder firmness, heart-rate variability, and behavior recordings in dairy cows\",\"authors\":\"Robin Joest ,&nbsp;Jenny Stracke ,&nbsp;Ute Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Incomplete Milking can strategically be used to induce short-term milk yield reduction, benefiting dairy cows’ metabolism without affecting long-term productivity. However, while intermitted milking has been associated with elevated udder pressure and discomfort in dairy cows, incomplete milking´s welfare effects remain less well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of automated short-term incomplete milking on udder filling and udder firmness, as well as on the welfare of dairy cows, by assessing heart rate variability (HRV) and behavior recordings. Udder healthy, multiparous dairy cows in peak- to mid-lactation were randomly assigned to the complete milking treatment (COMP; n = 23, 95 ± 49 days in milk, lactation number 3.0 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD)) or the incomplete milking treatment (INCL; n = 23, 93 ± 46 days in milk, lactation number 2.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD)). The incomplete milking consisted of two phases: In the 1st phase, milk withdrawal was gradually reduced by 9 %/day over 5.5 days, resulting in app. 40 % reduction and was followed by 3 complete milkings. Subsequently, in the 2nd phase, the 40 % reduction was maintained consistently for further 5.5 days. Milk yield did not differ between treatments before incomplete milking (COMP: 39.1 ± 1.42 kg/day; INCL: 40.2 ± 1.66 kg/day (mean ± SEM) and a 43 % reduced milk withdrawal was effectively achieved at the end of the 1st phase and throughout the 2nd phase. In INCL cows, udder filling increased, and udder firmness before milking was elevated on average by 18 % during the 1st and by 22 % during the 2nd phase, compared to COMP cows. After milking, udder firmness was on average 33 % higher in INCL cows throughout both phases. Udder health was not affected by incomplete milking and it had no effect on HRV indices, which remained consistent between groups and over time (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). No defense behavior was observed in the milking parlor, and behavior recordings in the barn showed no differences between treatments. This study demonstrates that, even though automated short-term incomplete milking resulted in increased udder filling and firmness – suggesting elevated residual milk and internal udder pressure –, incomplete milking does not indicate adverse effects on the welfare of dairy cows based on the indicators evaluated in this study. These findings support incomplete milking as a viable management strategy for dairy cows.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002965\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不完全挤奶可以有策略地诱导短期产奶量下降,有利于奶牛的新陈代谢,而不影响长期生产力。然而,虽然间歇性挤奶与奶牛的乳房压力升高和不适有关,但不完全挤奶对福利的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是通过评估心率变异性(HRV)和行为记录,评估自动短期不完全挤奶对奶牛乳房填充和乳房硬度的影响,以及对奶牛福利的影响。乳房健康,多产的奶牛在峰值-完全挤mid-lactation被随机分配到治疗(95年薪酬;n = 23日 ± 49天牛奶,哺乳期数量3.0 ±1.3 (平均数±标准差))或不完整的挤奶治疗(包括;n = 23,93 ± 46天的牛奶,哺乳期数量2.6 ±0.8 (平均数±标准差))。不完全挤奶分为两个阶段:第一阶段,在5.5天的时间里,泌乳量逐渐减少9 %/天,减少app. 40 %,然后是3次完全挤奶。随后,在第二阶段,40 %的降低持续了5.5天。不完全挤奶前的产奶量没有差异(COMP: 39.1 ± 1.42 kg/day; INCL: 40.2 ± 1.66 kg/day (mean±SEM)),在第一阶段结束和整个第二阶段有效地减少了43 %的泌乳量。与COMP奶牛相比,INCL奶牛的乳房填充量增加,泌乳前乳房硬度在第一阶段和第二阶段平均提高了18 %和22 %。挤奶后,INCL奶牛在两个阶段的乳房坚固度平均高出33 %。不完全挤奶对乳房健康没有影响,对HRV指数没有影响,这在组间和时间间保持一致(P >; 0.05)。挤奶厅里没有观察到奶牛的防御行为,牲口棚里的行为记录也没有显示不同处理之间的差异。本研究表明,尽管自动短期不完全挤奶导致乳房充盈和紧实度增加(表明残余奶量和内部乳房压力升高),但根据本研究评估的指标,不完全挤奶并不表明对奶牛的福利有不利影响。这些发现支持不完全挤奶是奶牛可行的管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of automated short-term incomplete milking during peak to mid lactation on udder firmness, heart-rate variability, and behavior recordings in dairy cows
Incomplete Milking can strategically be used to induce short-term milk yield reduction, benefiting dairy cows’ metabolism without affecting long-term productivity. However, while intermitted milking has been associated with elevated udder pressure and discomfort in dairy cows, incomplete milking´s welfare effects remain less well studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of automated short-term incomplete milking on udder filling and udder firmness, as well as on the welfare of dairy cows, by assessing heart rate variability (HRV) and behavior recordings. Udder healthy, multiparous dairy cows in peak- to mid-lactation were randomly assigned to the complete milking treatment (COMP; n = 23, 95 ± 49 days in milk, lactation number 3.0 ± 1.3 (mean ± SD)) or the incomplete milking treatment (INCL; n = 23, 93 ± 46 days in milk, lactation number 2.6 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD)). The incomplete milking consisted of two phases: In the 1st phase, milk withdrawal was gradually reduced by 9 %/day over 5.5 days, resulting in app. 40 % reduction and was followed by 3 complete milkings. Subsequently, in the 2nd phase, the 40 % reduction was maintained consistently for further 5.5 days. Milk yield did not differ between treatments before incomplete milking (COMP: 39.1 ± 1.42 kg/day; INCL: 40.2 ± 1.66 kg/day (mean ± SEM) and a 43 % reduced milk withdrawal was effectively achieved at the end of the 1st phase and throughout the 2nd phase. In INCL cows, udder filling increased, and udder firmness before milking was elevated on average by 18 % during the 1st and by 22 % during the 2nd phase, compared to COMP cows. After milking, udder firmness was on average 33 % higher in INCL cows throughout both phases. Udder health was not affected by incomplete milking and it had no effect on HRV indices, which remained consistent between groups and over time (P > 0.05). No defense behavior was observed in the milking parlor, and behavior recordings in the barn showed no differences between treatments. This study demonstrates that, even though automated short-term incomplete milking resulted in increased udder filling and firmness – suggesting elevated residual milk and internal udder pressure –, incomplete milking does not indicate adverse effects on the welfare of dairy cows based on the indicators evaluated in this study. These findings support incomplete milking as a viable management strategy for dairy cows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信