Rhianna Griffiths, Steve Lim, Julian Lin, Andrew Bates, Liam Jones, Kinda Ibrahim
{"title":"住院老年人抗胆碱能药物处方:一项系统综述","authors":"Rhianna Griffiths, Steve Lim, Julian Lin, Andrew Bates, Liam Jones, Kinda Ibrahim","doi":"10.1111/bcpt.70103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Anticholinergic medication use is increasing, particularly among older adults due to polypharmacy and comorbidities. High anticholinergic burden is linked to adverse outcomes such as reduced mobility and increased dementia risk. Acute hospital stays may offer an opportunity to address this often-overlooked issue.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the effects of deprescribing anticholinergic medications on outcomes in older hospitalised patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception to September 2024. Studies included hospital-based deprescribing or medication review interventions targeting anticholinergic burden in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Narrative synthesis followed SWiM guidelines, with quality assessment using JBI Checklists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 2042 records, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Designs included cohort (<i>n</i> = 4) and pre-post quasi-experimental (<i>n</i> = 4), with follow-up durations of up to 3 months. All reported medication-related outcomes; four assessed acceptability, one included clinical outcomes, and none examined safety. Six studies reported reductions in anticholinergic burden scores; three showed significant decreases in the proportion of patients prescribed anticholinergics, and two noted fewer potentially inappropriate medications. Most recommended changes were implemented.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Deprescribing interventions in hospital appear acceptable and effective in reducing anticholinergic burden. However, evidence on clinical outcomes, costs and safety is limited. Further RCTs with longer follow-up are needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8733,"journal":{"name":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":"137 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deprescribing Anticholinergic Medications in Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Rhianna Griffiths, Steve Lim, Julian Lin, Andrew Bates, Liam Jones, Kinda Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcpt.70103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anticholinergic medication use is increasing, particularly among older adults due to polypharmacy and comorbidities. High anticholinergic burden is linked to adverse outcomes such as reduced mobility and increased dementia risk. Acute hospital stays may offer an opportunity to address this often-overlooked issue.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the effects of deprescribing anticholinergic medications on outcomes in older hospitalised patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception to September 2024. Studies included hospital-based deprescribing or medication review interventions targeting anticholinergic burden in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Narrative synthesis followed SWiM guidelines, with quality assessment using JBI Checklists.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From 2042 records, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Designs included cohort (<i>n</i> = 4) and pre-post quasi-experimental (<i>n</i> = 4), with follow-up durations of up to 3 months. All reported medication-related outcomes; four assessed acceptability, one included clinical outcomes, and none examined safety. Six studies reported reductions in anticholinergic burden scores; three showed significant decreases in the proportion of patients prescribed anticholinergics, and two noted fewer potentially inappropriate medications. Most recommended changes were implemented.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Deprescribing interventions in hospital appear acceptable and effective in reducing anticholinergic burden. However, evidence on clinical outcomes, costs and safety is limited. Further RCTs with longer follow-up are needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"137 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bcpt.70103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcpt.70103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景抗胆碱能药物的使用正在增加,特别是在老年人中,由于多种药物和合并症。高抗胆碱能负荷与活动能力降低和痴呆风险增加等不良后果有关。急性住院可能提供了一个机会来解决这个经常被忽视的问题。目的探讨抗胆碱能药物对老年住院患者预后的影响。方法检索Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库,检索时间为建站至2024年9月。研究包括针对≥65岁患者抗胆碱能负担的以医院为基础的处方减少或药物回顾干预措施。叙事综合遵循SWiM指南,使用JBI检查清单进行质量评估。结果在2042份记录中,有8项研究符合纳入标准。设计包括队列(n = 4)和前后准实验(n = 4),随访时间长达3个月。所有报告的药物相关结果;四项评估可接受性,一项包括临床结果,没有一项评估安全性。六项研究报告了抗胆碱能负荷评分的降低;其中3项研究显示,服用抗胆碱能药物的患者比例显著下降,2项研究指出,潜在的不适当药物减少了。大多数建议的更改都已实现。结论减轻医院抗胆碱能负担可接受且有效。然而,关于临床结果、成本和安全性的证据有限。需要更长的随访时间进行进一步的随机对照试验。
Deprescribing Anticholinergic Medications in Hospitalised Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Background
Anticholinergic medication use is increasing, particularly among older adults due to polypharmacy and comorbidities. High anticholinergic burden is linked to adverse outcomes such as reduced mobility and increased dementia risk. Acute hospital stays may offer an opportunity to address this often-overlooked issue.
Aims
To examine the effects of deprescribing anticholinergic medications on outcomes in older hospitalised patients.
Methods
Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception to September 2024. Studies included hospital-based deprescribing or medication review interventions targeting anticholinergic burden in patients aged ≥ 65 years. Narrative synthesis followed SWiM guidelines, with quality assessment using JBI Checklists.
Results
From 2042 records, eight studies met inclusion criteria. Designs included cohort (n = 4) and pre-post quasi-experimental (n = 4), with follow-up durations of up to 3 months. All reported medication-related outcomes; four assessed acceptability, one included clinical outcomes, and none examined safety. Six studies reported reductions in anticholinergic burden scores; three showed significant decreases in the proportion of patients prescribed anticholinergics, and two noted fewer potentially inappropriate medications. Most recommended changes were implemented.
Conclusion
Deprescribing interventions in hospital appear acceptable and effective in reducing anticholinergic burden. However, evidence on clinical outcomes, costs and safety is limited. Further RCTs with longer follow-up are needed.
期刊介绍:
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology is an independent journal, publishing original scientific research in all fields of toxicology, basic and clinical pharmacology. This includes experimental animal pharmacology and toxicology and molecular (-genetic), biochemical and cellular pharmacology and toxicology. It also includes all aspects of clinical pharmacology: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug/drug interactions, pharmacogenetics/-genomics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilance, pharmacoeconomics, randomized controlled clinical trials and rational pharmacotherapy. For all compounds used in the studies, the chemical constitution and composition should be known, also for natural compounds.