HEALTHQUAL方案实施程度分析

IF 2 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes , Lambert Farand , Marie-Pascale Pomey , François Champagne
{"title":"HEALTHQUAL方案实施程度分析","authors":"Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes ,&nbsp;Lambert Farand ,&nbsp;Marie-Pascale Pomey ,&nbsp;François Champagne","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In evaluations of quality improvement programs, there is often a tendency to focus directly on outcomes or effects without first examining whether the program was fully implemented, only partially executed, or not implemented at all. In many cases, evaluators conclude that the program had little or no effect. However, it is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve meaningful results when the degree of implementation is low or nonexistent. This underscores the importance of assessing the degree of implementation as a prerequisite for explaining outcome gaps, analyzing the implementation process, and understanding the interaction between implementation level, context, and results. Generally, the higher the level of implementation, the more significant the potential outcomes.</div><div>Nevertheless, evaluating the degree of implementation remains a methodological challenge. The objective of this article is to rigorously assess the level of operationalization or implementation of a national quality improvement initiative, the HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program.</div><div>The HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program focuses on quality measurement, quality improvement activities, and the development of quality infrastructure, with the goal of enhancing patient and client satisfaction, strengthening health system performance, and improving the overall quality of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We developed the logic model for the HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program. Building on this model, we selected twelve key dimensions or components for qualitative assessment of the program’s degree of implementation. These dimensions include: identification and measurement of patient needs and expectations; patient involvement; creation of partnerships; multidisciplinary teams/quality committees; use of scientific methods; process management; fact-based management; coaching and mentoring; staff involvement; leadership involvement; development and implementation of the quality plan; and quality program evaluation. Using explicit criteria, these components served as the basis to judge the level of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The degree of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program varies across health facilities: Some demonstrate a low level of implementation, while others have achieved a medium level. No health facility reached a high degree of implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It is important to consider these findings when planning and implementing the HEALTHQUAL program. Identifying and addressing strategies to improve the degree of implementation, particularly by targeting the underlying factors that influence it, is essential. Further research is needed to better understand and clearly define both the degree of implementation and the factors that influence it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 102699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the degree of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Adrien Emmanuel Demes ,&nbsp;Lambert Farand ,&nbsp;Marie-Pascale Pomey ,&nbsp;François Champagne\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In evaluations of quality improvement programs, there is often a tendency to focus directly on outcomes or effects without first examining whether the program was fully implemented, only partially executed, or not implemented at all. In many cases, evaluators conclude that the program had little or no effect. However, it is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve meaningful results when the degree of implementation is low or nonexistent. This underscores the importance of assessing the degree of implementation as a prerequisite for explaining outcome gaps, analyzing the implementation process, and understanding the interaction between implementation level, context, and results. Generally, the higher the level of implementation, the more significant the potential outcomes.</div><div>Nevertheless, evaluating the degree of implementation remains a methodological challenge. The objective of this article is to rigorously assess the level of operationalization or implementation of a national quality improvement initiative, the HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program.</div><div>The HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program focuses on quality measurement, quality improvement activities, and the development of quality infrastructure, with the goal of enhancing patient and client satisfaction, strengthening health system performance, and improving the overall quality of care.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>We developed the logic model for the HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program. Building on this model, we selected twelve key dimensions or components for qualitative assessment of the program’s degree of implementation. These dimensions include: identification and measurement of patient needs and expectations; patient involvement; creation of partnerships; multidisciplinary teams/quality committees; use of scientific methods; process management; fact-based management; coaching and mentoring; staff involvement; leadership involvement; development and implementation of the quality plan; and quality program evaluation. Using explicit criteria, these components served as the basis to judge the level of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The degree of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program varies across health facilities: Some demonstrate a low level of implementation, while others have achieved a medium level. No health facility reached a high degree of implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It is important to consider these findings when planning and implementing the HEALTHQUAL program. Identifying and addressing strategies to improve the degree of implementation, particularly by targeting the underlying factors that influence it, is essential. Further research is needed to better understand and clearly define both the degree of implementation and the factors that influence it.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在质量改进计划的评估中,通常倾向于直接关注结果或效果,而不首先检查计划是否完全执行,只是部分执行,或者根本没有执行。在许多情况下,评估人员得出的结论是,该计划几乎没有效果。然而,当执行程度很低或根本不存在时,即使不是不可能,也很难取得有意义的结果。这强调了评估实施程度作为解释结果差距、分析实施过程和理解实施水平、背景和结果之间相互作用的先决条件的重要性。一般来说,实施水平越高,潜在的结果就越显著。然而,评价执行程度仍然是一个方法上的挑战。本文的目的是严格评估国家质量改进倡议,即海地健康质量计划的运作或实施水平。海地健康质量项目的重点是质量测量、质量改进活动和高质量基础设施的发展,其目标是提高患者和客户满意度,加强卫生系统绩效,提高整体护理质量。我们开发了海地健康质量项目的逻辑模型。在这个模型的基础上,我们选择了十二个关键维度或组成部分来对项目的实施程度进行定性评估。这些方面包括:识别和测量患者的需求和期望;病人参与;建立伙伴关系;多学科团队/质量委员会;运用科学的方法;流程管理;基于事实的管理;辅导和指导;员工参与;领导参与;质量计划的制定和实施;以及质量项目评估。使用明确的标准,这些组成部分作为判断HEALTHQUAL计划实施水平的基础。结果卫生保健质量方案的执行程度因卫生机构而异:一些卫生机构的执行水平较低,而另一些卫生机构的执行水平则达到了中等水平。没有一个保健设施达到高度执行。结论在规划和实施HEALTHQUAL项目时,应充分考虑这些调查结果。确定和处理提高执行程度的战略,特别是针对影响执行的根本因素,是至关重要的。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解和明确界定实施的程度和影响实施的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the degree of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program

Introduction

In evaluations of quality improvement programs, there is often a tendency to focus directly on outcomes or effects without first examining whether the program was fully implemented, only partially executed, or not implemented at all. In many cases, evaluators conclude that the program had little or no effect. However, it is difficult, if not impossible, to achieve meaningful results when the degree of implementation is low or nonexistent. This underscores the importance of assessing the degree of implementation as a prerequisite for explaining outcome gaps, analyzing the implementation process, and understanding the interaction between implementation level, context, and results. Generally, the higher the level of implementation, the more significant the potential outcomes.
Nevertheless, evaluating the degree of implementation remains a methodological challenge. The objective of this article is to rigorously assess the level of operationalization or implementation of a national quality improvement initiative, the HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program.
The HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program focuses on quality measurement, quality improvement activities, and the development of quality infrastructure, with the goal of enhancing patient and client satisfaction, strengthening health system performance, and improving the overall quality of care.

Methodology

We developed the logic model for the HEALTHQUAL-Haiti program. Building on this model, we selected twelve key dimensions or components for qualitative assessment of the program’s degree of implementation. These dimensions include: identification and measurement of patient needs and expectations; patient involvement; creation of partnerships; multidisciplinary teams/quality committees; use of scientific methods; process management; fact-based management; coaching and mentoring; staff involvement; leadership involvement; development and implementation of the quality plan; and quality program evaluation. Using explicit criteria, these components served as the basis to judge the level of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program.

Results

The degree of implementation of the HEALTHQUAL program varies across health facilities: Some demonstrate a low level of implementation, while others have achieved a medium level. No health facility reached a high degree of implementation.

Conclusion

It is important to consider these findings when planning and implementing the HEALTHQUAL program. Identifying and addressing strategies to improve the degree of implementation, particularly by targeting the underlying factors that influence it, is essential. Further research is needed to better understand and clearly define both the degree of implementation and the factors that influence it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信