探索可能性思维训练对教育者创造性自我知觉的影响:马耳他学校的混合方法行动研究

Q2 Psychology
Margaret Mangion , Andreia Valquaresma , Vlad P Glaveanu
{"title":"探索可能性思维训练对教育者创造性自我知觉的影响:马耳他学校的混合方法行动研究","authors":"Margaret Mangion ,&nbsp;Andreia Valquaresma ,&nbsp;Vlad P Glaveanu","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Creativity in education aims to foster mindsets and practices that envision and enact “what could be”. Possibility Thinking(PT) offers an outlet for teachers to hone in on their own self-perceptions while also cultivating environments that nurture creativity and possibility thinking in their students. Despite a sound body of conceptual literature (Craft, 2001, 2013; Glăveanu, 2017) and scant empirical studies (Burnard et al., 2006; Gregoriou, 2023) related to possibility thinking, there is a paucity of empirical studies employing mixed-methods to explore possibility thinking within authentic contexts. This article presents findings from a twelve-month mixed-method project conducted in four Maltese primary schools with a total of 304 educators. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to offer a comprehensive perspective. Adopting a pragmatism-informed approach and guided by the Five As of creativity (Glăveanu, 2012) – Actor, Action, Artefact, Audience, Affordances, this study integrates qualitative and quantitative methods to offer a holistic understanding of how PT training can be embedded in education to enhance creative self-perception and agency among educators. Quantitative data were collected through validated self-report scales measuring the creative self, creative mindsets, and PT dispositions. Qualitative data, gathered via reflective journals, observations, and thematic analysis, captured the contextual and emotional dimensions of practice. While no statistically significant group or time effects were found across quantitative measures in a two-way between-subjects ANOVA, PT and its subdimensionsshowed strong intercorrelations (<em>r</em> = .85 to .93, <em>p</em> &lt; .01) and moderate associations with growth mindset (<em>r</em> = .26 to .34, <em>p</em> &lt; .05) and creative self (<em>r</em> = .30 to .53, <em>p</em> &lt; .01) at both pre- and post-test. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: emotional engagement, practical relevance, structural constraints, and the importance of institutional support. These findings suggest that PT training, especially when embedded within reflective and supportive environments, can foster gradual yet meaningful shifts in teachers’ creative self-perceptions and pedagogical agency. Implications are discussed for professional development and creativity research in education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of possibility thinking training on educators’ creative self-perceptions: A mixed methods action research study in Maltese schools\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Mangion ,&nbsp;Andreia Valquaresma ,&nbsp;Vlad P Glaveanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metip.2025.100198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Creativity in education aims to foster mindsets and practices that envision and enact “what could be”. Possibility Thinking(PT) offers an outlet for teachers to hone in on their own self-perceptions while also cultivating environments that nurture creativity and possibility thinking in their students. Despite a sound body of conceptual literature (Craft, 2001, 2013; Glăveanu, 2017) and scant empirical studies (Burnard et al., 2006; Gregoriou, 2023) related to possibility thinking, there is a paucity of empirical studies employing mixed-methods to explore possibility thinking within authentic contexts. This article presents findings from a twelve-month mixed-method project conducted in four Maltese primary schools with a total of 304 educators. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to offer a comprehensive perspective. Adopting a pragmatism-informed approach and guided by the Five As of creativity (Glăveanu, 2012) – Actor, Action, Artefact, Audience, Affordances, this study integrates qualitative and quantitative methods to offer a holistic understanding of how PT training can be embedded in education to enhance creative self-perception and agency among educators. Quantitative data were collected through validated self-report scales measuring the creative self, creative mindsets, and PT dispositions. Qualitative data, gathered via reflective journals, observations, and thematic analysis, captured the contextual and emotional dimensions of practice. While no statistically significant group or time effects were found across quantitative measures in a two-way between-subjects ANOVA, PT and its subdimensionsshowed strong intercorrelations (<em>r</em> = .85 to .93, <em>p</em> &lt; .01) and moderate associations with growth mindset (<em>r</em> = .26 to .34, <em>p</em> &lt; .05) and creative self (<em>r</em> = .30 to .53, <em>p</em> &lt; .01) at both pre- and post-test. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: emotional engagement, practical relevance, structural constraints, and the importance of institutional support. These findings suggest that PT training, especially when embedded within reflective and supportive environments, can foster gradual yet meaningful shifts in teachers’ creative self-perceptions and pedagogical agency. Implications are discussed for professional development and creativity research in education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260125000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育中的创造力旨在培养设想和制定“可能是什么”的思维方式和实践。可能性思维(PT)为教师提供了一个磨练自我认知的出口,同时也培养了培养学生创造力和可能性思维的环境。尽管有大量与可能性思维相关的概念文献(Craft, 2001, 2013; glalloveanu, 2017)和少量实证研究(Burnard等人,2006;Gregoriou, 2023),但采用混合方法在真实情境中探索可能性思维的实证研究却很少。本文介绍了一项为期12个月的混合方法项目的结果,该项目在马耳他的四所小学进行,共有304名教育工作者。定性和定量数据相结合,提供了一个全面的视角。本研究采用实用主义的方法,并以创造力的五个a (glgluveanu, 2012)——行动者(Actor)、行动(Action)、人工制品(arfact)、观众(Audience)、支持(Affordances)——为指导,将定性和定量方法结合起来,全面了解如何将PT培训融入教育中,以增强教育者的创造性自我感知和能动性。通过有效的自我报告量表收集定量数据,测量创造性自我,创造性心态和PT倾向。通过反思性期刊、观察和专题分析收集的定性数据捕捉到了实践的语境和情感维度。虽然在双向受试者间方差分析中,在定量测量中没有发现统计学上显著的组效应或时间效应,但PT及其子维度显示出很强的相互相关性(r = 0.85至。93, p < .01)和成长心态的适度关联(r = .26至。34, p < 0.05)和创造性自我(r = 0.30 to。53, p < .01)。专题分析揭示了四个关键主题:情感投入、实际相关性、结构约束和制度支持的重要性。这些发现表明,体育训练,特别是在反思和支持的环境中,可以促进教师创造性自我认知和教学能动性的渐进而有意义的转变。讨论了教育专业发展和创造力研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the impact of possibility thinking training on educators’ creative self-perceptions: A mixed methods action research study in Maltese schools
Creativity in education aims to foster mindsets and practices that envision and enact “what could be”. Possibility Thinking(PT) offers an outlet for teachers to hone in on their own self-perceptions while also cultivating environments that nurture creativity and possibility thinking in their students. Despite a sound body of conceptual literature (Craft, 2001, 2013; Glăveanu, 2017) and scant empirical studies (Burnard et al., 2006; Gregoriou, 2023) related to possibility thinking, there is a paucity of empirical studies employing mixed-methods to explore possibility thinking within authentic contexts. This article presents findings from a twelve-month mixed-method project conducted in four Maltese primary schools with a total of 304 educators. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to offer a comprehensive perspective. Adopting a pragmatism-informed approach and guided by the Five As of creativity (Glăveanu, 2012) – Actor, Action, Artefact, Audience, Affordances, this study integrates qualitative and quantitative methods to offer a holistic understanding of how PT training can be embedded in education to enhance creative self-perception and agency among educators. Quantitative data were collected through validated self-report scales measuring the creative self, creative mindsets, and PT dispositions. Qualitative data, gathered via reflective journals, observations, and thematic analysis, captured the contextual and emotional dimensions of practice. While no statistically significant group or time effects were found across quantitative measures in a two-way between-subjects ANOVA, PT and its subdimensionsshowed strong intercorrelations (r = .85 to .93, p < .01) and moderate associations with growth mindset (r = .26 to .34, p < .05) and creative self (r = .30 to .53, p < .01) at both pre- and post-test. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes: emotional engagement, practical relevance, structural constraints, and the importance of institutional support. These findings suggest that PT training, especially when embedded within reflective and supportive environments, can foster gradual yet meaningful shifts in teachers’ creative self-perceptions and pedagogical agency. Implications are discussed for professional development and creativity research in education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信