膝关节置换术患者关节知觉问题阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-08-31 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70402

Khalid A. Alsheikh, Firas M. Alsebayel, Abdulrahman A. Alzahrani, Bader K. Alqahtani, Jude N. Abanmi, Abdulaziz F. Altammami

{"title":"膝关节置换术患者关节知觉问题阿拉伯语版本的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Khalid A. Alsheikh, Firas M. Alsebayel, Abdulrahman A. Alzahrani, Bader K. Alqahtani, Jude N. Abanmi, Abdulaziz F. Altammami","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to alleviate pain and restore function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. While the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) are established measures of patient satisfaction and functional outcomes after TKA, they may not directly capture the patient's subjective perception of the joint itself. The FJS was used to assess concurrent validity, as it reflects the degree to which patients are unaware of their artificial joint, which is related to joint perception. The patient's joint perception (PJP) question offers a simplified alternative to evaluate joint awareness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective observational study included patients who underwent TKA between 2018 and 2023. An Arabic version of the PJP (Ar-PJP) question was translated using a forward-backwards translation process. Participants completed the PJP, FJS, and reduced WOMAC at two time points, three weeks apart. Statistical analyses assessed validity and reliability using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 100 participants were included in the study. The mean PJP score was 28.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 13.7), and the mean WOMAC score was 46.1 (SD: 17.8). A moderate negative correlation was found between the Ar-PJP score and FJS (<i>r</i> = −0.683; <i>p</i> < 0.001), A moderate negative correlation was found between the Ar-PJP score and FJS (<i>r</i> = −0.683; <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the correlation with WOMAC was weak and non-significant (<i>r</i> = −0.088; <i>p</i> = 0.382), supporting discriminant validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Ar-PJP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing patients' perceptions post-TKA. As a single-question measure, it simplifies evaluations and enhances patient care in Arabic-speaking populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level II.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the patient's joint perception question in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"Khalid A. Alsheikh, Firas M. Alsebayel, Abdulrahman A. Alzahrani, Bader K. Alqahtani, Jude N. Abanmi, Abdulaziz F. Altammami\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to alleviate pain and restore function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. While the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) are established measures of patient satisfaction and functional outcomes after TKA, they may not directly capture the patient's subjective perception of the joint itself. The FJS was used to assess concurrent validity, as it reflects the degree to which patients are unaware of their artificial joint, which is related to joint perception. The patient's joint perception (PJP) question offers a simplified alternative to evaluate joint awareness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This prospective observational study included patients who underwent TKA between 2018 and 2023. An Arabic version of the PJP (Ar-PJP) question was translated using a forward-backwards translation process. Participants completed the PJP, FJS, and reduced WOMAC at two time points, three weeks apart. Statistical analyses assessed validity and reliability using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 100 participants were included in the study. The mean PJP score was 28.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 13.7), and the mean WOMAC score was 46.1 (SD: 17.8). A moderate negative correlation was found between the Ar-PJP score and FJS (<i>r</i> = −0.683; <i>p</i> < 0.001), A moderate negative correlation was found between the Ar-PJP score and FJS (<i>r</i> = −0.683; <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the correlation with WOMAC was weak and non-significant (<i>r</i> = −0.088; <i>p</i> = 0.382), supporting discriminant validity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Ar-PJP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing patients' perceptions post-TKA. As a single-question measure, it simplifies evaluations and enhances patient care in Arabic-speaking populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level II.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70402\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://esskajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的全膝关节置换术（TKA）旨在减轻膝关节骨性关节炎患者的疼痛和恢复功能。虽然遗忘关节评分（FJS）和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数（WOMAC）是TKA后患者满意度和功能结果的既定衡量标准，但它们可能无法直接捕捉患者对关节本身的主观感知。FJS被用来评估并发效度，因为它反映了患者不知道他们的人工关节的程度，这与关节感知有关。病人的关节知觉（PJP）问题提供了一个简单的替代评估关节知觉。方法本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了2018年至2023年间接受TKA的患者。阿拉伯语版本的PJP （Ar-PJP）问题使用正向向后翻译过程进行翻译。参与者在间隔三周的两个时间点完成PJP、FJS和减少WOMAC。统计分析采用Pearson相关系数评估效度和信度。结果本研究共纳入100名受试者。PJP平均评分为28.9（标准差[SD]: 13.7）， WOMAC平均评分为46.1（标准差[SD]: 17.8）。Ar-PJP评分与FJS呈中度负相关（r = - 0.683; p < 0.001）， Ar-PJP评分与FJS呈中度负相关（r = - 0.683; p < 0.001），而与WOMAC的相关性较弱且不显著（r = - 0.088; p = 0.382），支持区分效度。结论Ar-PJP是评估tka后患者知觉的有效、可靠的工具。作为一个单一问题的措施，它简化了评估并提高了对阿拉伯语人口的病人护理。证据等级二级。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the patient's joint perception question in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty

查看原文本刊更多论文

Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the patient's joint perception question in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to alleviate pain and restore function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. While the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) are established measures of patient satisfaction and functional outcomes after TKA, they may not directly capture the patient's subjective perception of the joint itself. The FJS was used to assess concurrent validity, as it reflects the degree to which patients are unaware of their artificial joint, which is related to joint perception. The patient's joint perception (PJP) question offers a simplified alternative to evaluate joint awareness.

Methods

This prospective observational study included patients who underwent TKA between 2018 and 2023. An Arabic version of the PJP (Ar-PJP) question was translated using a forward-backwards translation process. Participants completed the PJP, FJS, and reduced WOMAC at two time points, three weeks apart. Statistical analyses assessed validity and reliability using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results

A total of 100 participants were included in the study. The mean PJP score was 28.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 13.7), and the mean WOMAC score was 46.1 (SD: 17.8). A moderate negative correlation was found between the Ar-PJP score and FJS (r = −0.683; p < 0.001), A moderate negative correlation was found between the Ar-PJP score and FJS (r = −0.683; p < 0.001), while the correlation with WOMAC was weak and non-significant (r = −0.088; p = 0.382), supporting discriminant validity.

Conclusions

The Ar-PJP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing patients' perceptions post-TKA. As a single-question measure, it simplifies evaluations and enhances patient care in Arabic-speaking populations.