不同出苗前除草剂对甜菊菊的除草效果

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Zemei Yang, Yongkun Xie, Fangui Liu, Chuanzhi Wang, Xiaolei Wang
{"title":"不同出苗前除草剂对甜菊菊的除草效果","authors":"Zemei Yang,&nbsp;Yongkun Xie,&nbsp;Fangui Liu,&nbsp;Chuanzhi Wang,&nbsp;Xiaolei Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12355-025-01591-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To screen for safe and efficient preemergence herbicides for stevia, treatments of 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup>, 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, and 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> were sprayed onto the ridge before film mulching. The phytotoxicity of each treatment was observed on the 5th, 15th, and 30th days after transplanting of stevia, and the weed control effect was investigated on the 30th day after transplanting. Plant heights were measured on the 30th, 60th, 80th, 100th, and 116th days after transplanting, and the dry leaf yield during the harvest period was determined. The results revealed that 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> and 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> were safe for stevia, whereas 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> had irreversible phytotoxicity to stevia. The fresh weight control rates of 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, and 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> were 92.36%, 86.76%, and 83.34%, respectively. The 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment strongly affected the growth of stevia, and the plant height 60 days after transplanting was significantly different from those treated with 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup>, and the control treatment. The dry leaf yield of stevia for each treatment was: 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> (2.90 t/hm<sup>2</sup>), 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> (2.23 t/hm<sup>2</sup>), and 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> (1.57 t/hm<sup>2</sup>), which, compared with the control, were 82.39%, 40.25%, and − 1.26%, respectively. Our results suggested that the 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment had the best effect, followed by the 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment, and the 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"27 5","pages":"1683 - 1688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weed Control Effects of Different Preemergence Herbicides on Stevia rebaudiana\",\"authors\":\"Zemei Yang,&nbsp;Yongkun Xie,&nbsp;Fangui Liu,&nbsp;Chuanzhi Wang,&nbsp;Xiaolei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12355-025-01591-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To screen for safe and efficient preemergence herbicides for stevia, treatments of 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup>, 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, and 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> were sprayed onto the ridge before film mulching. The phytotoxicity of each treatment was observed on the 5th, 15th, and 30th days after transplanting of stevia, and the weed control effect was investigated on the 30th day after transplanting. Plant heights were measured on the 30th, 60th, 80th, 100th, and 116th days after transplanting, and the dry leaf yield during the harvest period was determined. The results revealed that 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> and 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> were safe for stevia, whereas 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> had irreversible phytotoxicity to stevia. The fresh weight control rates of 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, and 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> were 92.36%, 86.76%, and 83.34%, respectively. The 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment strongly affected the growth of stevia, and the plant height 60 days after transplanting was significantly different from those treated with 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup>, 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup>, and the control treatment. The dry leaf yield of stevia for each treatment was: 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> (2.90 t/hm<sup>2</sup>), 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> (2.23 t/hm<sup>2</sup>), and 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> (1.57 t/hm<sup>2</sup>), which, compared with the control, were 82.39%, 40.25%, and − 1.26%, respectively. Our results suggested that the 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment had the best effect, followed by the 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment, and the 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm<sup>2</sup> treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"1683 - 1688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sugar Tech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-025-01591-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-025-01591-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为筛选安全高效的甜菊菊苗期除草剂,采用96% s -甲草胺EC 750 mL/hm2、33%对二甲醚EC 3 L/hm2、20%萘丙胺EC 3 L/hm2的覆盖前垄沟喷施处理。在甜叶菊移栽后第5、15、30天观察各处理的植物毒性,并在移栽后第30天观察防杂草效果。分别于移栽后第30、60、80、100、116天测量株高,测定采收期干叶产量。结果表明,33%的对二甲醚EC 3 L/hm2和96%的s -甲草胺EC 750 mL/hm2对甜菊糖是安全的,而20%的萘丙胺EC 3 L/hm2对甜菊糖具有不可逆的植物毒性。20%萘丙胺EC 3 L/hm2、33%对甲醚EC 3 L/hm2和96% s -甲草胺EC 750 mL/hm2的鲜重控制率分别为92.36%、86.76%和83.34%。20%萘丙胺EC 3 L/hm2处理对甜叶菊的生长有较强的影响,移栽后60 d的株高与33%对二甲甲烷EC 3 L/hm2、96% s -甲草胺EC 750 mL/hm2和对照处理差异显著。甜叶菊各处理的干叶产量分别为:戊二甲基胺EC 3 L/hm2 (2.90 t/hm2) 33%、s -甲草胺EC 750 mL/hm2 (2.23 t/hm2) 96%、萘丙胺EC 3 L/hm2 (1.57 t/hm2) 20%,与对照相比分别为82.39%、40.25%和- 1.26%。结果表明,33%对二甲醚EC 3 L/hm2处理效果最佳,其次为96% s -甲草胺EC 750 mL/hm2处理,20%萘丙胺EC 3 L/hm2处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weed Control Effects of Different Preemergence Herbicides on Stevia rebaudiana

To screen for safe and efficient preemergence herbicides for stevia, treatments of 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm2, 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm2, and 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm2 were sprayed onto the ridge before film mulching. The phytotoxicity of each treatment was observed on the 5th, 15th, and 30th days after transplanting of stevia, and the weed control effect was investigated on the 30th day after transplanting. Plant heights were measured on the 30th, 60th, 80th, 100th, and 116th days after transplanting, and the dry leaf yield during the harvest period was determined. The results revealed that 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm2 and 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm2 were safe for stevia, whereas 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm2 had irreversible phytotoxicity to stevia. The fresh weight control rates of 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm2, 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm2, and 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm2 were 92.36%, 86.76%, and 83.34%, respectively. The 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm2 treatment strongly affected the growth of stevia, and the plant height 60 days after transplanting was significantly different from those treated with 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm2, 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm2, and the control treatment. The dry leaf yield of stevia for each treatment was: 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm2 (2.90 t/hm2), 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm2 (2.23 t/hm2), and 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm2 (1.57 t/hm2), which, compared with the control, were 82.39%, 40.25%, and − 1.26%, respectively. Our results suggested that the 33% pendimethalin EC 3 L/hm2 treatment had the best effect, followed by the 96% S-metolachlor EC 750 mL/hm2 treatment, and the 20% napropamide EC 3 L/hm2 treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信