择期手术取消:你会抓住这些病人吗?

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kate Ziser BPharm, GradDipEd, MClinPharm, FANZCAP (Lead&Mgmt, Cardiol.), Tori Burfield BPharm (Hons), BBus, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, PeriopMed)
{"title":"择期手术取消:你会抓住这些病人吗?","authors":"Kate Ziser BPharm, GradDipEd, MClinPharm, FANZCAP (Lead&Mgmt, Cardiol.),&nbsp;Tori Burfield BPharm (Hons), BBus, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, PeriopMed)","doi":"10.1002/jppr.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patients are often advised to withhold their medications prior to surgery. If the surgery date changes, a plan regarding medicine use needs to be communicated to the patient. Bulk cancellations of elective surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a gap in practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To report on intervention rate and time taken for pharmacist review of patient medications when bulk cancellations of elective surgery occurred.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A screening tool was developed for nursing staff to identify patients on high-risk medications. Medication plans were developed by the pharmacist, with input from the broader surgical team. Time spent was recorded by the pharmacist. Data were collected over a 3-week period in July 2022. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: CM0602202402). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study complied with Chapter 2.3 of the <i>National statement of ethical conduct in human research</i> and presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The pharmacist reviewed 154 cancellations, of which 17% (<i>n</i> = 26) required intervention by the pharmacist as they met the high-risk criteria identified by the screening tool. Of these, 34% (<i>n</i> = 9) had not attended pre-admission clinic for an original medication plan. The time to conduct a pharmacist review ranged from 10–14 min. At the time of cancellation, 84% (<i>n</i> = 130) of patients were awaiting a new surgery date. Surgical specialties most implicated included orthopaedic surgery (36%, <i>n</i> = 55) and urology (17%, <i>n</i> = 26). The average time between the cancellation date and a new surgery date was 7 days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A pharmacist-led process to review medication plans in patients whose elective surgery procedure date had been cancelled was developed. Communication of these plans is essential to ensure patient safety and reduce medication-related harm.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"55 4","pages":"305-310"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elective surgery cancellations: do you catch these patients?\",\"authors\":\"Kate Ziser BPharm, GradDipEd, MClinPharm, FANZCAP (Lead&Mgmt, Cardiol.),&nbsp;Tori Burfield BPharm (Hons), BBus, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, PeriopMed)\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jppr.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients are often advised to withhold their medications prior to surgery. If the surgery date changes, a plan regarding medicine use needs to be communicated to the patient. Bulk cancellations of elective surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a gap in practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To report on intervention rate and time taken for pharmacist review of patient medications when bulk cancellations of elective surgery occurred.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A screening tool was developed for nursing staff to identify patients on high-risk medications. Medication plans were developed by the pharmacist, with input from the broader surgical team. Time spent was recorded by the pharmacist. Data were collected over a 3-week period in July 2022. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: CM0602202402). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study complied with Chapter 2.3 of the <i>National statement of ethical conduct in human research</i> and presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The pharmacist reviewed 154 cancellations, of which 17% (<i>n</i> = 26) required intervention by the pharmacist as they met the high-risk criteria identified by the screening tool. Of these, 34% (<i>n</i> = 9) had not attended pre-admission clinic for an original medication plan. The time to conduct a pharmacist review ranged from 10–14 min. At the time of cancellation, 84% (<i>n</i> = 130) of patients were awaiting a new surgery date. Surgical specialties most implicated included orthopaedic surgery (36%, <i>n</i> = 55) and urology (17%, <i>n</i> = 26). The average time between the cancellation date and a new surgery date was 7 days.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A pharmacist-led process to review medication plans in patients whose elective surgery procedure date had been cancelled was developed. Communication of these plans is essential to ensure patient safety and reduce medication-related harm.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"305-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.70002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者通常被建议在手术前停止用药。如果手术日期改变,需要告知患者用药计划。由于新型冠状病毒感染症(COVID-19)大流行,大量选择性手术被取消,这凸显了实践上的差距。目的报告在选择性手术大量取消时,药师对患者用药的干预率和时间。方法为护理人员开发筛查工具,识别高危用药患者。药物计划是由药剂师根据外科团队的意见制定的。所用时间由药剂师记录。数据是在2022年7月的三周内收集的。由于南方地铁人类研究伦理委员会(参考编号:CM0602202402)的当地政策要求,本项目被豁免。这项豁免的理由如下:该研究符合国家人体研究伦理行为声明第2.3章,没有可预见的患者伤害风险。结果药师审查了154例取消,其中17% (n = 26)因符合筛查工具确定的高危标准而需要药师干预。其中,34% (n = 9)的患者没有参加原用药计划的入院前门诊。进行药剂师审查的时间为10-14分钟。在取消手术时,84% (n = 130)的患者正在等待新的手术日期。最受影响的外科专业包括骨科(36%,n = 55)和泌尿外科(17%,n = 26)。从取消手术日期到新手术日期的平均时间为7天。结论对取消择期手术的患者,建立了药师主导的用药计划审查流程。沟通这些计划对于确保患者安全和减少药物相关伤害至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elective surgery cancellations: do you catch these patients?

Background

Patients are often advised to withhold their medications prior to surgery. If the surgery date changes, a plan regarding medicine use needs to be communicated to the patient. Bulk cancellations of elective surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted a gap in practice.

Aim

To report on intervention rate and time taken for pharmacist review of patient medications when bulk cancellations of elective surgery occurred.

Method

A screening tool was developed for nursing staff to identify patients on high-risk medications. Medication plans were developed by the pharmacist, with input from the broader surgical team. Time spent was recorded by the pharmacist. Data were collected over a 3-week period in July 2022. This project was exempt due to the local policy requirements that constitute research by the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: CM0602202402). The justification for this exemption was as follows: the study complied with Chapter 2.3 of the National statement of ethical conduct in human research and presented no foreseeable risk of patient harm.

Results

The pharmacist reviewed 154 cancellations, of which 17% (n = 26) required intervention by the pharmacist as they met the high-risk criteria identified by the screening tool. Of these, 34% (n = 9) had not attended pre-admission clinic for an original medication plan. The time to conduct a pharmacist review ranged from 10–14 min. At the time of cancellation, 84% (n = 130) of patients were awaiting a new surgery date. Surgical specialties most implicated included orthopaedic surgery (36%, n = 55) and urology (17%, n = 26). The average time between the cancellation date and a new surgery date was 7 days.

Conclusion

A pharmacist-led process to review medication plans in patients whose elective surgery procedure date had been cancelled was developed. Communication of these plans is essential to ensure patient safety and reduce medication-related harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信