胸腹主动脉瘤混合手术修复的血流动力学数值模拟

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Luca Bertoglio , Stefano Bonardelli , Giuseppe Dalla Vecchia , Antonio Ghidoni , Gianmaria Noventa , Marco Ravanelli
{"title":"胸腹主动脉瘤混合手术修复的血流动力学数值模拟","authors":"Luca Bertoglio ,&nbsp;Stefano Bonardelli ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Dalla Vecchia ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghidoni ,&nbsp;Gianmaria Noventa ,&nbsp;Marco Ravanelli","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>: The hybrid surgical repair is a feasible alternative to conventional open surgical or total endovascular repairs for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. However, a small number of patients are treated every year with this procedure, and for this reason, a negligible amount of numerical or measured data is available in the literature. Moreover, the complex and highly variable stent graft design in hybrid surgical repairs means that a priori prediction of haemodynamic flow parameters and clinical or surgical outcomes remain challenging. The goal of this work is to appraise the clinical relevance of computational fluid dynamics and numerical results in the setting of hybrid surgical repairs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Numerical simulations are carried out on three patients with a large range of elements of the meshes to assess the spatial convergence of the result. Flow rates and geometries are calculated and reconstructed in the post-operative conditions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Numerical results demonstrate higher accuracy with respect to measurements. In fact, the measured outflow rates are not able to match the measured inflow rate in any patient. From the point of view of the spatial convergence of the results, the acceptable mesh depends on the quantity of interest, e.g., (<span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>) in terms of the time-averaged outflow rates, the mesh with 4 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 10<sup>6</sup> elements is acceptable, (<span><math><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></math></span>) in terms of the maximum values in the distribution of the wall shear stresses, the mesh with 16 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 10<sup>6</sup> elements is acceptable, while (<span><math><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></math></span>) in terms of the numerical dissipation, only the mesh with 64 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 10<sup>6</sup> elements is acceptable for all patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>: Numerical results demonstrate that computational fluid dynamics can be used, especially in hybrid surgical repairs, to generate potentially actionable predictive insights with implications for surveillance and enhanced postoperative management. Moreover, numerical results can also be used in preoperative surgical planning coupled with geometry optimization algorithms to identify the best designs for the patient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10624,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 108998"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Haemodynamic numerical simulation of hybrid surgical repairs for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms\",\"authors\":\"Luca Bertoglio ,&nbsp;Stefano Bonardelli ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Dalla Vecchia ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghidoni ,&nbsp;Gianmaria Noventa ,&nbsp;Marco Ravanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.108998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>: The hybrid surgical repair is a feasible alternative to conventional open surgical or total endovascular repairs for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. However, a small number of patients are treated every year with this procedure, and for this reason, a negligible amount of numerical or measured data is available in the literature. Moreover, the complex and highly variable stent graft design in hybrid surgical repairs means that a priori prediction of haemodynamic flow parameters and clinical or surgical outcomes remain challenging. The goal of this work is to appraise the clinical relevance of computational fluid dynamics and numerical results in the setting of hybrid surgical repairs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Numerical simulations are carried out on three patients with a large range of elements of the meshes to assess the spatial convergence of the result. Flow rates and geometries are calculated and reconstructed in the post-operative conditions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Numerical results demonstrate higher accuracy with respect to measurements. In fact, the measured outflow rates are not able to match the measured inflow rate in any patient. From the point of view of the spatial convergence of the results, the acceptable mesh depends on the quantity of interest, e.g., (<span><math><mi>i</mi></math></span>) in terms of the time-averaged outflow rates, the mesh with 4 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 10<sup>6</sup> elements is acceptable, (<span><math><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></math></span>) in terms of the maximum values in the distribution of the wall shear stresses, the mesh with 16 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 10<sup>6</sup> elements is acceptable, while (<span><math><mrow><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></math></span>) in terms of the numerical dissipation, only the mesh with 64 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 10<sup>6</sup> elements is acceptable for all patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>: Numerical results demonstrate that computational fluid dynamics can be used, especially in hybrid surgical repairs, to generate potentially actionable predictive insights with implications for surveillance and enhanced postoperative management. Moreover, numerical results can also be used in preoperative surgical planning coupled with geometry optimization algorithms to identify the best designs for the patient.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"271 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725004158\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260725004158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:混合手术是治疗胸腹动脉瘤的一种可行的方法,可以替代传统的切开手术或全血管内修复术。然而,每年只有少数患者接受这种治疗,因此,文献中可获得的数值或测量数据可以忽略不计。此外,混合手术修复中复杂和高度可变的支架设计意味着对血流动力学参数和临床或手术结果的先验预测仍然具有挑战性。这项工作的目的是评估混合手术修复设置的计算流体动力学和数值结果的临床相关性。方法:对3例患者进行大范围网格单元的数值模拟,评估结果的空间收敛性。通过相衬磁共振成像计算和重建手术后的流量和几何形状。结果:数值结果显示了较高的测量精度。事实上,在任何患者中,测量到的流出率都不能与测量到的流入率相匹配。从的角度的空间收敛结果,接受网取决于数量的兴趣,例如,(i)的流出速度,定4×106的网格元素是可以接受的,(ii)的最大值在壁剪切应力的分布,16×106的网格元素是可以接受的,而(iii)的数值耗散,只有64×106的网格元素对所有病人是可以接受的。结论:数值结果表明,计算流体动力学可以用于,特别是在混合手术修复中,产生潜在的可操作的预测见解,具有监测和加强术后管理的意义。此外,数值结果也可用于术前手术计划,结合几何优化算法,为患者确定最佳设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Haemodynamic numerical simulation of hybrid surgical repairs for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Background and objective

: The hybrid surgical repair is a feasible alternative to conventional open surgical or total endovascular repairs for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. However, a small number of patients are treated every year with this procedure, and for this reason, a negligible amount of numerical or measured data is available in the literature. Moreover, the complex and highly variable stent graft design in hybrid surgical repairs means that a priori prediction of haemodynamic flow parameters and clinical or surgical outcomes remain challenging. The goal of this work is to appraise the clinical relevance of computational fluid dynamics and numerical results in the setting of hybrid surgical repairs.

Methods:

Numerical simulations are carried out on three patients with a large range of elements of the meshes to assess the spatial convergence of the result. Flow rates and geometries are calculated and reconstructed in the post-operative conditions with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Results:

Numerical results demonstrate higher accuracy with respect to measurements. In fact, the measured outflow rates are not able to match the measured inflow rate in any patient. From the point of view of the spatial convergence of the results, the acceptable mesh depends on the quantity of interest, e.g., (i) in terms of the time-averaged outflow rates, the mesh with 4 × 106 elements is acceptable, (ii) in terms of the maximum values in the distribution of the wall shear stresses, the mesh with 16 × 106 elements is acceptable, while (iii) in terms of the numerical dissipation, only the mesh with 64 × 106 elements is acceptable for all patients.

Conclusions

: Numerical results demonstrate that computational fluid dynamics can be used, especially in hybrid surgical repairs, to generate potentially actionable predictive insights with implications for surveillance and enhanced postoperative management. Moreover, numerical results can also be used in preoperative surgical planning coupled with geometry optimization algorithms to identify the best designs for the patient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine
Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
135 days
期刊介绍: To encourage the development of formal computing methods, and their application in biomedical research and medical practice, by illustration of fundamental principles in biomedical informatics research; to stimulate basic research into application software design; to report the state of research of biomedical information processing projects; to report new computer methodologies applied in biomedical areas; the eventual distribution of demonstrable software to avoid duplication of effort; to provide a forum for discussion and improvement of existing software; to optimize contact between national organizations and regional user groups by promoting an international exchange of information on formal methods, standards and software in biomedicine. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine covers computing methodology and software systems derived from computing science for implementation in all aspects of biomedical research and medical practice. It is designed to serve: biochemists; biologists; geneticists; immunologists; neuroscientists; pharmacologists; toxicologists; clinicians; epidemiologists; psychiatrists; psychologists; cardiologists; chemists; (radio)physicists; computer scientists; programmers and systems analysts; biomedical, clinical, electrical and other engineers; teachers of medical informatics and users of educational software.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信