道德价值观与气候变化态度有何关系?X(以前的Twitter)和微博上的语言使用分析

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yunya Song , Chris Chao Su , Yuanhang Lu , Qintao Huang , Jonathon P. Schuldt
{"title":"道德价值观与气候变化态度有何关系?X(以前的Twitter)和微博上的语言使用分析","authors":"Yunya Song ,&nbsp;Chris Chao Su ,&nbsp;Yuanhang Lu ,&nbsp;Qintao Huang ,&nbsp;Jonathon P. Schuldt","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the cultural and moral frameworks that shape public attitudes toward climate change is essential for fostering environmental engagement and sustainable behavior. Using supervised transfer-learning techniques and computational text analysis, this study investigates climate change discourse on X (formerly Twitter) and Sina Weibo, two major social media platforms with contrasting cultural contexts, from 2016 to 2021, focusing on the moral foundations and issue topics driving public attitudes. Climate activism emerges as the dominant stance on both platforms, rooted in the care foundation and reflecting global environmental concern. However, fairness is linked to skepticism on Weibo and neutrality on X, revealing cultural differences in perceptions of climate justice and responsibility. Binding moral foundations prominently relate to activism on Weibo but are associated with neutrality on X. Topic modeling uncovers issue-specific contexts, highlighting the nuanced interplay between cultural norms and moral reasoning in climate communication. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally tailored messaging strategies to foster pro-environmental attitudes and global cooperation in addressing climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102736"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do moral values relate to climate change attitudes? An analysis of language use on X (formerly Twitter) and Weibo\",\"authors\":\"Yunya Song ,&nbsp;Chris Chao Su ,&nbsp;Yuanhang Lu ,&nbsp;Qintao Huang ,&nbsp;Jonathon P. Schuldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the cultural and moral frameworks that shape public attitudes toward climate change is essential for fostering environmental engagement and sustainable behavior. Using supervised transfer-learning techniques and computational text analysis, this study investigates climate change discourse on X (formerly Twitter) and Sina Weibo, two major social media platforms with contrasting cultural contexts, from 2016 to 2021, focusing on the moral foundations and issue topics driving public attitudes. Climate activism emerges as the dominant stance on both platforms, rooted in the care foundation and reflecting global environmental concern. However, fairness is linked to skepticism on Weibo and neutrality on X, revealing cultural differences in perceptions of climate justice and responsibility. Binding moral foundations prominently relate to activism on Weibo but are associated with neutrality on X. Topic modeling uncovers issue-specific contexts, highlighting the nuanced interplay between cultural norms and moral reasoning in climate communication. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally tailored messaging strategies to foster pro-environmental attitudes and global cooperation in addressing climate change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002191\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解影响公众对气候变化态度的文化和道德框架,对于促进环境参与和可持续行为至关重要。利用监督迁移学习技术和计算文本分析,本研究调查了2016年至2021年两个文化背景截然不同的主要社交媒体平台X(原Twitter)和新浪微博上的气候变化话语,重点关注道德基础和驱动公众态度的问题话题。气候行动主义在两个平台上都成为主导立场,植根于关怀基金会,反映了全球对环境的关注。然而,公平与微博上的怀疑主义和X上的中立联系在一起,揭示了对气候正义和责任的看法的文化差异。具有约束力的道德基础主要与微博上的行动主义有关,但与x上的中立有关。话题建模揭示了具体问题的背景,突出了气候传播中文化规范和道德推理之间微妙的相互作用。这些研究结果强调了根据不同文化量身定制的信息传递策略对于培养环保态度和应对气候变化的全球合作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do moral values relate to climate change attitudes? An analysis of language use on X (formerly Twitter) and Weibo
Understanding the cultural and moral frameworks that shape public attitudes toward climate change is essential for fostering environmental engagement and sustainable behavior. Using supervised transfer-learning techniques and computational text analysis, this study investigates climate change discourse on X (formerly Twitter) and Sina Weibo, two major social media platforms with contrasting cultural contexts, from 2016 to 2021, focusing on the moral foundations and issue topics driving public attitudes. Climate activism emerges as the dominant stance on both platforms, rooted in the care foundation and reflecting global environmental concern. However, fairness is linked to skepticism on Weibo and neutrality on X, revealing cultural differences in perceptions of climate justice and responsibility. Binding moral foundations prominently relate to activism on Weibo but are associated with neutrality on X. Topic modeling uncovers issue-specific contexts, highlighting the nuanced interplay between cultural norms and moral reasoning in climate communication. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally tailored messaging strategies to foster pro-environmental attitudes and global cooperation in addressing climate change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信