Yunya Song , Chris Chao Su , Yuanhang Lu , Qintao Huang , Jonathon P. Schuldt
{"title":"道德价值观与气候变化态度有何关系?X(以前的Twitter)和微博上的语言使用分析","authors":"Yunya Song , Chris Chao Su , Yuanhang Lu , Qintao Huang , Jonathon P. Schuldt","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Understanding the cultural and moral frameworks that shape public attitudes toward climate change is essential for fostering environmental engagement and sustainable behavior. Using supervised transfer-learning techniques and computational text analysis, this study investigates climate change discourse on X (formerly Twitter) and Sina Weibo, two major social media platforms with contrasting cultural contexts, from 2016 to 2021, focusing on the moral foundations and issue topics driving public attitudes. Climate activism emerges as the dominant stance on both platforms, rooted in the care foundation and reflecting global environmental concern. However, fairness is linked to skepticism on Weibo and neutrality on X, revealing cultural differences in perceptions of climate justice and responsibility. Binding moral foundations prominently relate to activism on Weibo but are associated with neutrality on X. Topic modeling uncovers issue-specific contexts, highlighting the nuanced interplay between cultural norms and moral reasoning in climate communication. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally tailored messaging strategies to foster pro-environmental attitudes and global cooperation in addressing climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102736"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do moral values relate to climate change attitudes? An analysis of language use on X (formerly Twitter) and Weibo\",\"authors\":\"Yunya Song , Chris Chao Su , Yuanhang Lu , Qintao Huang , Jonathon P. Schuldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Understanding the cultural and moral frameworks that shape public attitudes toward climate change is essential for fostering environmental engagement and sustainable behavior. Using supervised transfer-learning techniques and computational text analysis, this study investigates climate change discourse on X (formerly Twitter) and Sina Weibo, two major social media platforms with contrasting cultural contexts, from 2016 to 2021, focusing on the moral foundations and issue topics driving public attitudes. Climate activism emerges as the dominant stance on both platforms, rooted in the care foundation and reflecting global environmental concern. However, fairness is linked to skepticism on Weibo and neutrality on X, revealing cultural differences in perceptions of climate justice and responsibility. Binding moral foundations prominently relate to activism on Weibo but are associated with neutrality on X. Topic modeling uncovers issue-specific contexts, highlighting the nuanced interplay between cultural norms and moral reasoning in climate communication. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally tailored messaging strategies to foster pro-environmental attitudes and global cooperation in addressing climate change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002191\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002191","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How do moral values relate to climate change attitudes? An analysis of language use on X (formerly Twitter) and Weibo
Understanding the cultural and moral frameworks that shape public attitudes toward climate change is essential for fostering environmental engagement and sustainable behavior. Using supervised transfer-learning techniques and computational text analysis, this study investigates climate change discourse on X (formerly Twitter) and Sina Weibo, two major social media platforms with contrasting cultural contexts, from 2016 to 2021, focusing on the moral foundations and issue topics driving public attitudes. Climate activism emerges as the dominant stance on both platforms, rooted in the care foundation and reflecting global environmental concern. However, fairness is linked to skepticism on Weibo and neutrality on X, revealing cultural differences in perceptions of climate justice and responsibility. Binding moral foundations prominently relate to activism on Weibo but are associated with neutrality on X. Topic modeling uncovers issue-specific contexts, highlighting the nuanced interplay between cultural norms and moral reasoning in climate communication. These findings emphasize the importance of culturally tailored messaging strategies to foster pro-environmental attitudes and global cooperation in addressing climate change.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space