Amanda Paula Ricardo Rodrigues da Cunha , Marieli Araujo Rossoni Marcioli , Maurício Rodrigues Miyasaki , Dylleyne Kryss de Souza , Christiane de Souza Guerino Macedo
{"title":"大转子痛综合征女性在静态和动态单腿支撑任务中的肌肉力量和激活模式","authors":"Amanda Paula Ricardo Rodrigues da Cunha , Marieli Araujo Rossoni Marcioli , Maurício Rodrigues Miyasaki , Dylleyne Kryss de Souza , Christiane de Souza Guerino Macedo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by functional and biomechanical changes. This study aimed to compare hip strength and hip and trunk activation during single-leg support in women with GTPS and controls, exploring their correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>36 females were divided into two groups: the GTPS group (<em>n</em> = 18) and the control group (<em>n</em> = 18). A portable dynamometer was used to assess the isometric strength hip muscles, whereas surface electromyography was used to measure muscle activation in the hip and trunk muscles during static and dynamic single-leg support. The data were analyzed using the Student's <em>t</em>-test, Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. The effect size was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The GTPS group has lower strength in all hip muscles (p ≤ 0.001). In static single-leg support, GTPS group showed greater activation of the rectus abdominis (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.48) and gluteus maximus (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.45). In dynamic single-leg support, women with GTPS had high activation of the rectus abdominis (<em>p</em> = 0.01, ES = 0.42), gluteus maximus (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.49), and trunk extensors (<em>p</em> = 0.01, ES = 0.39). <strong>Discussion</strong>: The findings show that women with GTPS had higher pain, lower muscle strength, and changes in muscle activation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Women with GTPS demonstrated decreased muscle strength and increased muscle activation. Evaluation of all hip muscles, along with interventions focused on improving strength across these groups, could enhance pelvic control and minimizing discrepancies in muscle activation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages 174-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle strength and activation patterns during static and dynamic single-leg support tasks in women with greater trochanteric pain syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Paula Ricardo Rodrigues da Cunha , Marieli Araujo Rossoni Marcioli , Maurício Rodrigues Miyasaki , Dylleyne Kryss de Souza , Christiane de Souza Guerino Macedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.08.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by functional and biomechanical changes. This study aimed to compare hip strength and hip and trunk activation during single-leg support in women with GTPS and controls, exploring their correlation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>36 females were divided into two groups: the GTPS group (<em>n</em> = 18) and the control group (<em>n</em> = 18). A portable dynamometer was used to assess the isometric strength hip muscles, whereas surface electromyography was used to measure muscle activation in the hip and trunk muscles during static and dynamic single-leg support. The data were analyzed using the Student's <em>t</em>-test, Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. The effect size was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The GTPS group has lower strength in all hip muscles (p ≤ 0.001). In static single-leg support, GTPS group showed greater activation of the rectus abdominis (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.48) and gluteus maximus (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.45). In dynamic single-leg support, women with GTPS had high activation of the rectus abdominis (<em>p</em> = 0.01, ES = 0.42), gluteus maximus (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.49), and trunk extensors (<em>p</em> = 0.01, ES = 0.39). <strong>Discussion</strong>: The findings show that women with GTPS had higher pain, lower muscle strength, and changes in muscle activation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Women with GTPS demonstrated decreased muscle strength and increased muscle activation. Evaluation of all hip muscles, along with interventions focused on improving strength across these groups, could enhance pelvic control and minimizing discrepancies in muscle activation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 174-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225003328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Muscle strength and activation patterns during static and dynamic single-leg support tasks in women with greater trochanteric pain syndrome
Introduction
The Greater trochanter pain syndrome (GTPS) is characterized by functional and biomechanical changes. This study aimed to compare hip strength and hip and trunk activation during single-leg support in women with GTPS and controls, exploring their correlation.
Methods
36 females were divided into two groups: the GTPS group (n = 18) and the control group (n = 18). A portable dynamometer was used to assess the isometric strength hip muscles, whereas surface electromyography was used to measure muscle activation in the hip and trunk muscles during static and dynamic single-leg support. The data were analyzed using the Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. The effect size was determined.
Results
The GTPS group has lower strength in all hip muscles (p ≤ 0.001). In static single-leg support, GTPS group showed greater activation of the rectus abdominis (p ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.48) and gluteus maximus (p ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.45). In dynamic single-leg support, women with GTPS had high activation of the rectus abdominis (p = 0.01, ES = 0.42), gluteus maximus (p ≤ 0.01, ES = 0.49), and trunk extensors (p = 0.01, ES = 0.39). Discussion: The findings show that women with GTPS had higher pain, lower muscle strength, and changes in muscle activation.
Conclusion
Women with GTPS demonstrated decreased muscle strength and increased muscle activation. Evaluation of all hip muscles, along with interventions focused on improving strength across these groups, could enhance pelvic control and minimizing discrepancies in muscle activation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina