评估术前颈内动脉直径对血运重建术后脑高灌注综合征的预测作用

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mitsuhiro Anan , Kohei Onishi , Masaki Morishige , Kunpei Takao , Wataru Matsushita , Kaito Arimatsu , So Okuma , Yukari Kawasaki , Yasuyuki Nagai , Yu Takeda , Nobuhiro Hata , Minoru Fujiki
{"title":"评估术前颈内动脉直径对血运重建术后脑高灌注综合征的预测作用","authors":"Mitsuhiro Anan ,&nbsp;Kohei Onishi ,&nbsp;Masaki Morishige ,&nbsp;Kunpei Takao ,&nbsp;Wataru Matsushita ,&nbsp;Kaito Arimatsu ,&nbsp;So Okuma ,&nbsp;Yukari Kawasaki ,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Nagai ,&nbsp;Yu Takeda ,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Hata ,&nbsp;Minoru Fujiki","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is potentially life-threatening complication after carotid revascularization procedures. This study aims to evaluate whether preoperative cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter can serve as a predictor for CHS following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort of 78 patients undergoing CEA or CAS between 2011 and 2024 was analyzed. ICA diameters were measured preoperatively at three standard cervical segments using contrast-enhanced computed tomography or digital subtraction angiography. The association between diameter measurements and postoperative CHS was statistically evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CHS occurred in 4 cases (5.1 %). The CHS group had significantly smaller treated-side ICA diameters (median 2.73 mm vs 3.89 mm, p = 0.019), larger contralateral ICA diameters (4.89 mm vs 4.33 mm, p = 0.047), and high stenosis ratio (0.57 vs 0.88, p = 0.0017). A stenosis ratio 0.677 was identified as a significant predictor of CHS (AUC = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.924–1.000; sensitivity = 100 %, specificity = 92 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative assessment of ICA diameters may help predict the risk of CHS. This anatomical metric should be considered in conjunction with hemodynamic evaluations to enhance perioperative risk stratification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"258 ","pages":"Article 109125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of preoperative cervical internal carotid artery diameter as a predictor of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following revascularization surgery\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuhiro Anan ,&nbsp;Kohei Onishi ,&nbsp;Masaki Morishige ,&nbsp;Kunpei Takao ,&nbsp;Wataru Matsushita ,&nbsp;Kaito Arimatsu ,&nbsp;So Okuma ,&nbsp;Yukari Kawasaki ,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Nagai ,&nbsp;Yu Takeda ,&nbsp;Nobuhiro Hata ,&nbsp;Minoru Fujiki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is potentially life-threatening complication after carotid revascularization procedures. This study aims to evaluate whether preoperative cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter can serve as a predictor for CHS following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort of 78 patients undergoing CEA or CAS between 2011 and 2024 was analyzed. ICA diameters were measured preoperatively at three standard cervical segments using contrast-enhanced computed tomography or digital subtraction angiography. The association between diameter measurements and postoperative CHS was statistically evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CHS occurred in 4 cases (5.1 %). The CHS group had significantly smaller treated-side ICA diameters (median 2.73 mm vs 3.89 mm, p = 0.019), larger contralateral ICA diameters (4.89 mm vs 4.33 mm, p = 0.047), and high stenosis ratio (0.57 vs 0.88, p = 0.0017). A stenosis ratio 0.677 was identified as a significant predictor of CHS (AUC = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.924–1.000; sensitivity = 100 %, specificity = 92 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Preoperative assessment of ICA diameters may help predict the risk of CHS. This anatomical metric should be considered in conjunction with hemodynamic evaluations to enhance perioperative risk stratification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"258 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725004081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846725004081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的颅内高灌注综合征(CHS)是颈动脉血运重建术后可能危及生命的并发症。本研究旨在评估术前颈内动脉(ICA)直径是否可以作为颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)后CHS的预测指标。方法回顾性分析2011 ~ 2024年间78例经CEA或CAS治疗的患者。术前使用对比增强计算机断层扫描或数字减影血管造影测量三个标准颈椎节段的ICA直径。对直径测量与术后CHS之间的关系进行统计学评价。结果发生4例(5.1% %)。CHS组显著较小treated-side ICA直径(平均2.73 毫米vs 3.89 毫米,p = 0.019),大侧ICA直径(4.89 毫米vs 4.33 毫米,p = 0.047),和高狭窄率(0.57 vs 0.88, p = 0.0017)。狭窄比0.677被确定为CHS的重要预测因子(AUC = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.924-1.000;敏感性= 100 %,特异性= 92 %)。结论术前评估内窥镜直径有助于预测CHS的发生风险。这种解剖学指标应与血流动力学评估结合考虑,以增强围手术期风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of preoperative cervical internal carotid artery diameter as a predictor of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome following revascularization surgery

Objective

Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) is potentially life-threatening complication after carotid revascularization procedures. This study aims to evaluate whether preoperative cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) diameter can serve as a predictor for CHS following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 78 patients undergoing CEA or CAS between 2011 and 2024 was analyzed. ICA diameters were measured preoperatively at three standard cervical segments using contrast-enhanced computed tomography or digital subtraction angiography. The association between diameter measurements and postoperative CHS was statistically evaluated.

Results

CHS occurred in 4 cases (5.1 %). The CHS group had significantly smaller treated-side ICA diameters (median 2.73 mm vs 3.89 mm, p = 0.019), larger contralateral ICA diameters (4.89 mm vs 4.33 mm, p = 0.047), and high stenosis ratio (0.57 vs 0.88, p = 0.0017). A stenosis ratio 0.677 was identified as a significant predictor of CHS (AUC = 0.97, 95 % CI: 0.924–1.000; sensitivity = 100 %, specificity = 92 %).

Conclusion

Preoperative assessment of ICA diameters may help predict the risk of CHS. This anatomical metric should be considered in conjunction with hemodynamic evaluations to enhance perioperative risk stratification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信