沃替西汀治疗儿童重度抑郁症:12周随机、安慰剂对照研究

Michael Huss MD , Robert L. Findling MD, MBA , Melissa P. DelBello MD, MS , Oscar Necking MD , Maria L. Petersen MD , Simon Nitschky Schmidt MSc , Monika Rosen PhD
{"title":"沃替西汀治疗儿童重度抑郁症:12周随机、安慰剂对照研究","authors":"Michael Huss MD ,&nbsp;Robert L. Findling MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Melissa P. DelBello MD, MS ,&nbsp;Oscar Necking MD ,&nbsp;Maria L. Petersen MD ,&nbsp;Simon Nitschky Schmidt MSc ,&nbsp;Monika Rosen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children ages 7 to 11 years with major depressive disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Patients meeting criteria for incomplete improvement in depressive symptoms (Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised [CDRS-R] total score ≥40 plus &lt;40% reduction and Parent Global Assessment Global Improvement score &gt;2) after 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a brief psychosocial intervention plus placebo were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8-week double-blind treatment with brief psychosocial intervention and placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, or fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Following preplanned interim analysis, enrollment to fluoxetine was stopped, and patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg, or vortioxetine 20 mg. The primary end point was change in CDRS-R total score from baseline to week 8 for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 683 patients enrolled in single-blind lead-in treatment, 540 were randomized to the double-blind period. The mean (SE) change from randomization to week 8 in CDRS-R total score for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo was −19.6 (1.2) and −17.5 (1.4), with a mean difference of −2.1 (1.2) (2-sided <em>p</em> = .0937). Overall, 47% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events in the double-blind period; nausea was the most common adverse event in the vortioxetine groups (11.1%-12.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No statistically significant differences were observed in improvement in CDRS-R total score between placebo and vortioxetine; hence, efficacy of vortioxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder in children could not be confirmed. Safety and tolerability data were similar to that seen in adolescents and adults, with no outstanding safety concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This global study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children aged 7-11 years with major depressive disorder (MDD). Those who did not improve after 4 weeks of initial treatment with placebo and psychotherapy (540 children) were randomly assigned to a placebo, vortioxetine 10-mg/d, or vortioxetine 20-mg/d for 8 weeks and psychotherapy. The primary measure was the change in depressive symptoms using the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R); children on vortioxetine showed a slight improvement in CDRS-R total scores compared to those on placebo. Vortioxetine (average of 10-mg/d and 20-mg doses/d) was not more effective than placebo (mean difference of –2.1 points; <em>p</em> = 0.0937). Safety and tolerability measures were similar to previous studies of adults and adolescents treated with vortioxetine, with nausea being the most common adverse effect in the vortioxetine groups (11.1% among participants receiving vortioxetine 20-mg/d and 12.6% among participants receiving vortioxetine 10-mg/d).</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration information</h3><div>Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Participants Aged 7 to 11 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 736-748"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Children: 12-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study\",\"authors\":\"Michael Huss MD ,&nbsp;Robert L. Findling MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Melissa P. DelBello MD, MS ,&nbsp;Oscar Necking MD ,&nbsp;Maria L. Petersen MD ,&nbsp;Simon Nitschky Schmidt MSc ,&nbsp;Monika Rosen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children ages 7 to 11 years with major depressive disorder.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Patients meeting criteria for incomplete improvement in depressive symptoms (Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised [CDRS-R] total score ≥40 plus &lt;40% reduction and Parent Global Assessment Global Improvement score &gt;2) after 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a brief psychosocial intervention plus placebo were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8-week double-blind treatment with brief psychosocial intervention and placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, or fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Following preplanned interim analysis, enrollment to fluoxetine was stopped, and patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg, or vortioxetine 20 mg. The primary end point was change in CDRS-R total score from baseline to week 8 for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 683 patients enrolled in single-blind lead-in treatment, 540 were randomized to the double-blind period. The mean (SE) change from randomization to week 8 in CDRS-R total score for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo was −19.6 (1.2) and −17.5 (1.4), with a mean difference of −2.1 (1.2) (2-sided <em>p</em> = .0937). Overall, 47% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events in the double-blind period; nausea was the most common adverse event in the vortioxetine groups (11.1%-12.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No statistically significant differences were observed in improvement in CDRS-R total score between placebo and vortioxetine; hence, efficacy of vortioxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder in children could not be confirmed. Safety and tolerability data were similar to that seen in adolescents and adults, with no outstanding safety concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>This global study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children aged 7-11 years with major depressive disorder (MDD). Those who did not improve after 4 weeks of initial treatment with placebo and psychotherapy (540 children) were randomly assigned to a placebo, vortioxetine 10-mg/d, or vortioxetine 20-mg/d for 8 weeks and psychotherapy. The primary measure was the change in depressive symptoms using the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R); children on vortioxetine showed a slight improvement in CDRS-R total scores compared to those on placebo. Vortioxetine (average of 10-mg/d and 20-mg doses/d) was not more effective than placebo (mean difference of –2.1 points; <em>p</em> = 0.0937). Safety and tolerability measures were similar to previous studies of adults and adolescents treated with vortioxetine, with nausea being the most common adverse effect in the vortioxetine groups (11.1% among participants receiving vortioxetine 20-mg/d and 12.6% among participants receiving vortioxetine 10-mg/d).</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration information</h3><div>Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Participants Aged 7 to 11 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAACAP open\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 736-748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAACAP open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价沃替西汀治疗7 ~ 11岁重度抑郁症患儿的疗效、安全性和耐受性。方法在单盲引入治疗4周后,满足抑郁症状不完全改善标准的患者(儿童抑郁评定量表-修订[CDRS-R]总分≥40 + 40%减少和家长全球评估整体改善评分+ gt;2)随机分为1:1:1:1:1至8周双盲治疗:短暂社会心理干预+安慰剂,沃替西汀10 mg/天,沃替西汀20 mg/天,或者氟西汀20mg /天。在预先计划的中期分析之后,氟西汀的入组被停止,患者以1:1:1的比例随机分配到安慰剂、沃替西汀10mg或沃替西汀20mg。主要终点是沃替西汀10-mg和20-mg剂量与安慰剂的平均CDRS-R总评分从基线到第8周的变化。结果683例患者入组单盲先导治疗,540例随机进入双盲期。从随机分组到第8周,沃替西汀10-mg和20-mg剂量与安慰剂的平均CDRS-R总评分的平均(SE)变化为- 19.6(1.2)和- 17.5(1.4),平均差异为- 2.1(1.2)(双侧p = 0.937)。总体而言,47%的患者在双盲期报告了治疗引起的不良事件;恶心是沃替西汀组中最常见的不良事件(11.1%-12.6%)。结论安慰剂组与沃替西汀组CDRS-R总分改善差异无统计学意义;因此,沃替西汀治疗儿童重度抑郁症的疗效尚不能确定。安全性和耐受性数据与青少年和成人相似,没有明显的安全性问题。这项全球研究评估了沃替西汀治疗7-11岁重度抑郁症(MDD)儿童的有效性、安全性和耐受性。那些在4周安慰剂和心理治疗后没有改善的患者(540名儿童)被随机分配到安慰剂组、沃替西汀10mg /d组或沃替西汀20mg /d组,持续8周并进行心理治疗。主要测量方法是使用儿童抑郁评定量表(CDRS-R)进行抑郁症状的改变;与服用安慰剂的儿童相比,服用沃替西汀的儿童在CDRS-R总分上略有改善。沃替西汀(平均剂量为10mg /d和20mg /d)并不比安慰剂更有效(平均差异为-2.1分;p = 0.0937)。安全性和耐受性测量与先前对vortioxetine治疗的成人和青少年的研究相似,恶心是vortioxetine组中最常见的不良反应(在接受vortioxetine 20mg /d的参与者中为11.1%,在接受vortioxetine 10mg /d的参与者中为12.6%)。氟西汀在7 ~ 11岁重度抑郁症(MDD)患儿中的固定剂量研究https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vortioxetine for Major Depressive Disorder in Children: 12-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Objective

To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children ages 7 to 11 years with major depressive disorder.

Method

Patients meeting criteria for incomplete improvement in depressive symptoms (Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised [CDRS-R] total score ≥40 plus <40% reduction and Parent Global Assessment Global Improvement score >2) after 4 weeks of single-blind lead-in treatment with a brief psychosocial intervention plus placebo were randomized 1:1:1:1 to 8-week double-blind treatment with brief psychosocial intervention and placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg/day, vortioxetine 20 mg/day, or fluoxetine 20 mg/day. Following preplanned interim analysis, enrollment to fluoxetine was stopped, and patients were randomized 1:1:1 to placebo, vortioxetine 10 mg, or vortioxetine 20 mg. The primary end point was change in CDRS-R total score from baseline to week 8 for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo.

Results

Of 683 patients enrolled in single-blind lead-in treatment, 540 were randomized to the double-blind period. The mean (SE) change from randomization to week 8 in CDRS-R total score for average of vortioxetine 10-mg and 20-mg doses vs placebo was −19.6 (1.2) and −17.5 (1.4), with a mean difference of −2.1 (1.2) (2-sided p = .0937). Overall, 47% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events in the double-blind period; nausea was the most common adverse event in the vortioxetine groups (11.1%-12.6%).

Conclusion

No statistically significant differences were observed in improvement in CDRS-R total score between placebo and vortioxetine; hence, efficacy of vortioxetine for treatment of major depressive disorder in children could not be confirmed. Safety and tolerability data were similar to that seen in adolescents and adults, with no outstanding safety concerns.

Plain language summary

This global study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of vortioxetine in children aged 7-11 years with major depressive disorder (MDD). Those who did not improve after 4 weeks of initial treatment with placebo and psychotherapy (540 children) were randomly assigned to a placebo, vortioxetine 10-mg/d, or vortioxetine 20-mg/d for 8 weeks and psychotherapy. The primary measure was the change in depressive symptoms using the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R); children on vortioxetine showed a slight improvement in CDRS-R total scores compared to those on placebo. Vortioxetine (average of 10-mg/d and 20-mg doses/d) was not more effective than placebo (mean difference of –2.1 points; p = 0.0937). Safety and tolerability measures were similar to previous studies of adults and adolescents treated with vortioxetine, with nausea being the most common adverse effect in the vortioxetine groups (11.1% among participants receiving vortioxetine 20-mg/d and 12.6% among participants receiving vortioxetine 10-mg/d).

Clinical trial registration information

Active Reference (Fluoxetine) Fixed-dose Study of Vortioxetine in Paediatric Participants Aged 7 to 11 Years With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02709655.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信