Julián D. Rolan , Jonatan A. Arnol , Francisco I. Lugo , Norberto J. Uriz , Andrea R. Bidone , Carlos A. Cingolani , Miguel A.S. Basei , Maximiliano Naipauer
{"title":"冈瓦纳西南部晚古生代冰期古地理背景的新视角:阿根廷Paganzo盆地的U-Pb年龄和沉积物源数据","authors":"Julián D. Rolan , Jonatan A. Arnol , Francisco I. Lugo , Norberto J. Uriz , Andrea R. Bidone , Carlos A. Cingolani , Miguel A.S. Basei , Maximiliano Naipauer","doi":"10.1016/j.jop.2025.100274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents the first detrital zircon U–Pb analysis alongside new petrographic data from the Jejenes Formation (Serpukhovian–Bashkirian), located on the southern margin of the Paganzo Basin, Argentina in Southwest Gondwana. The results were compared with previously published data from other synchronously deposited units to the north (Guandacol Formation) and northeast (Malanzán Formation). Notably, glacigenic deposits are present in both the Guandacol and Jejenes formations but absent in the Malanzán Formation. A sedimentary provenance analysis was conducted for the three units, highlighting similarities and differences among the depocenters, allowing for the reconstruction of the paleogeographic and topographic landscape of the Paganzo Basin during the Serpukhovian–Bashkirian time. The comparative analysis supports the idea of disconnection and isolation among the three depocenters with each unit recording predominantly proximal sources and the recycling of pre-Carboniferous substrate. Although certain similarities exist in the age distribution of the detrital zircon grains recorded for the Malanzán and Guandacol formations, this does not imply that the depocenters were connected or fed by the same source area. Instead, these successions were likely sourced from rocks with a similar geological history, resulting in comparable age distributions due to sediment recycling. Thus, the results support a conservative approach when estimating sedimentary provenance in ancient glacigenic deposits, emphasizing the need to evaluate local sediment sources. The absence of glacigenic deposits in the Malanzán Formation could be linked to a lower topography, linked to distinct tectonic histories in the Pie de Palo, Valle Fértil, and Chepes–Malanzán ranges, underscoring the role of tectonic inheritance in the distribution of glacial centers during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Palaeogeography","volume":"14 4","pages":"Article 100274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New perspectives on the paleogeographic context of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Southwest Gondwana: U–Pb ages and sedimentary provenance data from the Paganzo Basin, Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Julián D. Rolan , Jonatan A. Arnol , Francisco I. Lugo , Norberto J. Uriz , Andrea R. Bidone , Carlos A. Cingolani , Miguel A.S. Basei , Maximiliano Naipauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jop.2025.100274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents the first detrital zircon U–Pb analysis alongside new petrographic data from the Jejenes Formation (Serpukhovian–Bashkirian), located on the southern margin of the Paganzo Basin, Argentina in Southwest Gondwana. The results were compared with previously published data from other synchronously deposited units to the north (Guandacol Formation) and northeast (Malanzán Formation). Notably, glacigenic deposits are present in both the Guandacol and Jejenes formations but absent in the Malanzán Formation. A sedimentary provenance analysis was conducted for the three units, highlighting similarities and differences among the depocenters, allowing for the reconstruction of the paleogeographic and topographic landscape of the Paganzo Basin during the Serpukhovian–Bashkirian time. The comparative analysis supports the idea of disconnection and isolation among the three depocenters with each unit recording predominantly proximal sources and the recycling of pre-Carboniferous substrate. Although certain similarities exist in the age distribution of the detrital zircon grains recorded for the Malanzán and Guandacol formations, this does not imply that the depocenters were connected or fed by the same source area. Instead, these successions were likely sourced from rocks with a similar geological history, resulting in comparable age distributions due to sediment recycling. Thus, the results support a conservative approach when estimating sedimentary provenance in ancient glacigenic deposits, emphasizing the need to evaluate local sediment sources. The absence of glacigenic deposits in the Malanzán Formation could be linked to a lower topography, linked to distinct tectonic histories in the Pie de Palo, Valle Fértil, and Chepes–Malanzán ranges, underscoring the role of tectonic inheritance in the distribution of glacial centers during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Palaeogeography\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Palaeogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209538362500080X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Palaeogeography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209538362500080X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究首次对碎屑锆石U-Pb进行了分析,并对位于阿根廷冈瓦纳西南部Paganzo盆地南缘的Jejenes组(Serpukhovian-Bashkirian)进行了新的岩石学分析。研究结果与北部(guanandacol组)和东北部(Malanzán组)其他同期沉积单元的数据进行了比较。值得注意的是,在Guandacol组和Jejenes组中都有冰川沉积,但在Malanzán组中没有。对三个单元进行了沉积物源分析,突出了沉积中心之间的相似性和差异性,从而重建了Serpukhovian-Bashkirian时期Paganzo盆地的古地理和地形景观。对比分析支持了三个沉积中心之间的分离和隔离的观点,每个单元主要记录近端物源和前石炭系底物的再循环。虽然Malanzán组和关达科尔组的碎屑锆石颗粒年龄分布存在一定的相似性,但这并不意味着两个沉积中心是由同一源区连接或形成的。相反,这些序列可能来自具有相似地质历史的岩石,由于沉积物循环,导致年龄分布相似。因此,在估计古冰川沉积物源时,结果支持保守的方法,强调需要评估当地的沉积物来源。Malanzán组没有冰川沉积可能与较低的地形有关,与Pie de Palo、Valle fsamritil和Chepes-Malanzán范围的不同构造历史有关,强调了构造继承在晚古生代冰期冰川中心分布中的作用。
New perspectives on the paleogeographic context of the Late Paleozoic Ice Age in Southwest Gondwana: U–Pb ages and sedimentary provenance data from the Paganzo Basin, Argentina
This study presents the first detrital zircon U–Pb analysis alongside new petrographic data from the Jejenes Formation (Serpukhovian–Bashkirian), located on the southern margin of the Paganzo Basin, Argentina in Southwest Gondwana. The results were compared with previously published data from other synchronously deposited units to the north (Guandacol Formation) and northeast (Malanzán Formation). Notably, glacigenic deposits are present in both the Guandacol and Jejenes formations but absent in the Malanzán Formation. A sedimentary provenance analysis was conducted for the three units, highlighting similarities and differences among the depocenters, allowing for the reconstruction of the paleogeographic and topographic landscape of the Paganzo Basin during the Serpukhovian–Bashkirian time. The comparative analysis supports the idea of disconnection and isolation among the three depocenters with each unit recording predominantly proximal sources and the recycling of pre-Carboniferous substrate. Although certain similarities exist in the age distribution of the detrital zircon grains recorded for the Malanzán and Guandacol formations, this does not imply that the depocenters were connected or fed by the same source area. Instead, these successions were likely sourced from rocks with a similar geological history, resulting in comparable age distributions due to sediment recycling. Thus, the results support a conservative approach when estimating sedimentary provenance in ancient glacigenic deposits, emphasizing the need to evaluate local sediment sources. The absence of glacigenic deposits in the Malanzán Formation could be linked to a lower topography, linked to distinct tectonic histories in the Pie de Palo, Valle Fértil, and Chepes–Malanzán ranges, underscoring the role of tectonic inheritance in the distribution of glacial centers during the Late Paleozoic Ice Age.