新型机械瓣膜与支架生物瓣膜在65岁以上患者分离二尖瓣置换术中的比较

IF 1.9
Antonio Piperata MD, PhD , Carlo Mariani MD, PhD , Giacomo Murana MD, PhD , Elio Fabbri PhD , Paola Rucci PhD , Maria Francesca Scuppa MD , Filippo Londi MD , Edoardo Bianco MD , Benedetta Guerrini MD , Ivan Tammaro MD , Ludovica Fabiani MD , Margherita Careddu MD , Marta Bellomare MD , Silvia Snaidero MD , Riccardo Nania MD , Sabrina Castagnini MD , Marta Di Carlo MD , Valentina Orioli MD , Gianluca Folesani MD , Davide Pacini MD, PhD
{"title":"新型机械瓣膜与支架生物瓣膜在65岁以上患者分离二尖瓣置换术中的比较","authors":"Antonio Piperata MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo Mariani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giacomo Murana MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Elio Fabbri PhD ,&nbsp;Paola Rucci PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Francesca Scuppa MD ,&nbsp;Filippo Londi MD ,&nbsp;Edoardo Bianco MD ,&nbsp;Benedetta Guerrini MD ,&nbsp;Ivan Tammaro MD ,&nbsp;Ludovica Fabiani MD ,&nbsp;Margherita Careddu MD ,&nbsp;Marta Bellomare MD ,&nbsp;Silvia Snaidero MD ,&nbsp;Riccardo Nania MD ,&nbsp;Sabrina Castagnini MD ,&nbsp;Marta Di Carlo MD ,&nbsp;Valentina Orioli MD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Folesani MD ,&nbsp;Davide Pacini MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare early and long-term clinical outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical (On-X) mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients aged 65 years and older.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients equal to or older than 65 years underwent isolated MVR from 2005 to 2023. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early- and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with bioprostheses and mechanical On-X valve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 330 patients were included, of whom 232 (70.3%) experienced bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (BMVR group) and 98 (29.7%) mechanical mitral valve replacement (MMVR group) with On-X prosthesis. Propensity score analysis allowed to match 98 patients from each group. In the matched cohorts, the overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.7%, 86.5%, and 69.5% for the MMVR group and 89.6%, 80.8%, and 62.5% for the BMVR (log-rank test: 1.88, <em>P</em> = .170). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation, endocarditis, pacemaker implantation, and hemorrhagic events were comparable between the 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients older than 65 years requiring isolated MVR, the use of On-X mechanical prosthesis showed comparable long-term outcomes over bioprostheses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 85-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of a novel mechanical valve versus stented bioprosthetic valves for isolated mitral valve replacement in patients older than 65 years\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Piperata MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Carlo Mariani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Giacomo Murana MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Elio Fabbri PhD ,&nbsp;Paola Rucci PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Francesca Scuppa MD ,&nbsp;Filippo Londi MD ,&nbsp;Edoardo Bianco MD ,&nbsp;Benedetta Guerrini MD ,&nbsp;Ivan Tammaro MD ,&nbsp;Ludovica Fabiani MD ,&nbsp;Margherita Careddu MD ,&nbsp;Marta Bellomare MD ,&nbsp;Silvia Snaidero MD ,&nbsp;Riccardo Nania MD ,&nbsp;Sabrina Castagnini MD ,&nbsp;Marta Di Carlo MD ,&nbsp;Valentina Orioli MD ,&nbsp;Gianluca Folesani MD ,&nbsp;Davide Pacini MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.06.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare early and long-term clinical outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical (On-X) mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients aged 65 years and older.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients equal to or older than 65 years underwent isolated MVR from 2005 to 2023. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early- and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with bioprostheses and mechanical On-X valve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 330 patients were included, of whom 232 (70.3%) experienced bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (BMVR group) and 98 (29.7%) mechanical mitral valve replacement (MMVR group) with On-X prosthesis. Propensity score analysis allowed to match 98 patients from each group. In the matched cohorts, the overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.7%, 86.5%, and 69.5% for the MMVR group and 89.6%, 80.8%, and 62.5% for the BMVR (log-rank test: 1.88, <em>P</em> = .170). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation, endocarditis, pacemaker implantation, and hemorrhagic events were comparable between the 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients older than 65 years requiring isolated MVR, the use of On-X mechanical prosthesis showed comparable long-term outcomes over bioprostheses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTCVS open\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 85-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTCVS open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625002219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625002219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较65岁及以上患者生物假体与机械(On-X)二尖瓣置换术(MVR)的早期和长期临床效果。方法本研究为单中心回顾性研究,纳入了2005年至2023年接受孤立MVR的65岁以上患者。进行倾向评分匹配分析,比较生物假体和机械On-X瓣膜患者的早期和长期临床结果。结果共纳入330例患者,其中生物二尖瓣置换术(BMVR组)232例(70.3%),机械二尖瓣置换术(MMVR组)98例(29.7%)。倾向评分分析允许从每组中匹配98例患者。在匹配的队列中,MMVR组的1年、5年和10年总生存率分别为97.7%、86.5%和69.5%,BMVR组的总生存率分别为89.6%、80.8%和62.5% (log-rank检验:1.88,P = 0.170)。1年、5年和10年再手术、心内膜炎、起搏器植入和出血事件的发生率在两组之间具有可比性。结论对于年龄大于65岁需要孤立MVR的患者,使用On-X机械假体与生物假体相比具有相当的长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of a novel mechanical valve versus stented bioprosthetic valves for isolated mitral valve replacement in patients older than 65 years

Comparison of a novel mechanical valve versus stented bioprosthetic valves for isolated mitral valve replacement in patients older than 65 years

Objective

To compare early and long-term clinical outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical (On-X) mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients aged 65 years and older.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients equal to or older than 65 years underwent isolated MVR from 2005 to 2023. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early- and long-term clinical outcomes between patients with bioprostheses and mechanical On-X valve.

Results

A total of 330 patients were included, of whom 232 (70.3%) experienced bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement (BMVR group) and 98 (29.7%) mechanical mitral valve replacement (MMVR group) with On-X prosthesis. Propensity score analysis allowed to match 98 patients from each group. In the matched cohorts, the overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.7%, 86.5%, and 69.5% for the MMVR group and 89.6%, 80.8%, and 62.5% for the BMVR (log-rank test: 1.88, P = .170). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from reoperation, endocarditis, pacemaker implantation, and hemorrhagic events were comparable between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

In patients older than 65 years requiring isolated MVR, the use of On-X mechanical prosthesis showed comparable long-term outcomes over bioprostheses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信