低至中度直肠癌机器人根治术中的预防性造口

Zhekun Huang , Songbin Lin , Peiwen Zhou , Yang Lv , Guodong He , Ye Wei , Jianmin Xu , Wentao Tang
{"title":"低至中度直肠癌机器人根治术中的预防性造口","authors":"Zhekun Huang ,&nbsp;Songbin Lin ,&nbsp;Peiwen Zhou ,&nbsp;Yang Lv ,&nbsp;Guodong He ,&nbsp;Ye Wei ,&nbsp;Jianmin Xu ,&nbsp;Wentao Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anastomotic leakage are common and serious complications after surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers; a prophylactic stoma is thought to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and alleviate its serious complications. However, it also comes with numerous risks. This study will investigate the value of prophylactic stomas in robot-assisted radical surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 670 patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical resection at two hospitals within Fudan University from June 2016 to October 2022 (77 underwent prophylactic stoma and 593 did not have prophylactic stoma). The clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed using a propensity score matching method that matched the groups at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, distance of the lower edge of the tumor from the anal verge, maximum diameter of the tumor, and preoperative incomplete obstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the prophylactic stoma group had a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage than the non-stoma group. There were no significant differences in the overall postoperative complication, unplanned readmission, or 30-day postoperative reoperation rates between the groups; however, the prophylactic stoma group had a lower number of postoperative hospital days and lower average hospital costs. Preoperative bowel obstruction was an independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leakage in the prophylactic stoma group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Prophylactic stomas based on a robotic platform are beneficial for some high-risk patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic stoma in robotic radical surgery for low-to-intermediate rectal cancer\",\"authors\":\"Zhekun Huang ,&nbsp;Songbin Lin ,&nbsp;Peiwen Zhou ,&nbsp;Yang Lv ,&nbsp;Guodong He ,&nbsp;Ye Wei ,&nbsp;Jianmin Xu ,&nbsp;Wentao Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2025.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anastomotic leakage are common and serious complications after surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers; a prophylactic stoma is thought to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and alleviate its serious complications. However, it also comes with numerous risks. This study will investigate the value of prophylactic stomas in robot-assisted radical surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 670 patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical resection at two hospitals within Fudan University from June 2016 to October 2022 (77 underwent prophylactic stoma and 593 did not have prophylactic stoma). The clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed using a propensity score matching method that matched the groups at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, distance of the lower edge of the tumor from the anal verge, maximum diameter of the tumor, and preoperative incomplete obstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the prophylactic stoma group had a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage than the non-stoma group. There were no significant differences in the overall postoperative complication, unplanned readmission, or 30-day postoperative reoperation rates between the groups; however, the prophylactic stoma group had a lower number of postoperative hospital days and lower average hospital costs. Preoperative bowel obstruction was an independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leakage in the prophylactic stoma group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Prophylactic stomas based on a robotic platform are beneficial for some high-risk patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X25000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X25000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吻合口瘘是低、中度直肠癌术后常见且严重的并发症;预防性造口术被认为可以减少吻合口瘘的发生率,减轻其严重的并发症。然而,它也带来了许多风险。本研究将探讨预防造口在机器人辅助的低、中度直肠癌根治术中的价值。方法纳入2016年6月至2022年10月在复旦大学两家医院行机器人辅助根治性切除术的670例低至中度直肠癌患者,其中77例行预防性造口术,593例未行预防性造口术。收集患者的临床资料,根据性别、糖尿病、体重指数、新辅助放化疗、肿瘤下缘距肛缘距离、肿瘤最大直径、术前不完全性梗阻等因素,采用倾向评分匹配法,按1:1比例进行分组匹配。结果预防造瘘组有症状性吻合口瘘发生率明显低于非造瘘组。两组患者术后总体并发症、非计划再入院或术后30天再手术率无显著差异;然而,预防性造口组术后住院天数较低,平均住院费用较低。术前肠梗阻是预防性造口组术后吻合口漏的独立危险因素。结论基于机器人平台的预防性造口术对部分中低危直肠癌患者是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prophylactic stoma in robotic radical surgery for low-to-intermediate rectal cancer

Background

Anastomotic leakage are common and serious complications after surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers; a prophylactic stoma is thought to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and alleviate its serious complications. However, it also comes with numerous risks. This study will investigate the value of prophylactic stomas in robot-assisted radical surgery for low and intermediate rectal cancers.

Methods

We included 670 patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical resection at two hospitals within Fudan University from June 2016 to October 2022 (77 underwent prophylactic stoma and 593 did not have prophylactic stoma). The clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed using a propensity score matching method that matched the groups at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, distance of the lower edge of the tumor from the anal verge, maximum diameter of the tumor, and preoperative incomplete obstruction.

Results

Patients in the prophylactic stoma group had a significantly lower incidence of symptomatic anastomotic leakage than the non-stoma group. There were no significant differences in the overall postoperative complication, unplanned readmission, or 30-day postoperative reoperation rates between the groups; however, the prophylactic stoma group had a lower number of postoperative hospital days and lower average hospital costs. Preoperative bowel obstruction was an independent risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leakage in the prophylactic stoma group.

Conclusions

Prophylactic stomas based on a robotic platform are beneficial for some high-risk patients with low-to-intermediate rectal cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信