Desirae Ehley MD , Lilit Vardanyan MS , Rebecca S. Boxer MD, MS , Alex J. Fauer PhD , Shiruyeh Schokrpur MD, PhD , David Gandara MD , Jonathan W. Riess MD, MAS , Surbhi Singhal MD
{"title":"老年人参与早期肺癌临床试验,1998年至2020年","authors":"Desirae Ehley MD , Lilit Vardanyan MS , Rebecca S. Boxer MD, MS , Alex J. Fauer PhD , Shiruyeh Schokrpur MD, PhD , David Gandara MD , Jonathan W. Riess MD, MAS , Surbhi Singhal MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Despite advances, lung cancer treatment remains associated with substantial toxicity. Early-phase clinical trials inform the safety and efficacy of novel lung cancer treatments. Although older adults represent most patients with lung cancer, and they are underrepresented in phase 3 trials, age disparity in early-phase lung cancer trials is ill-defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> to identify early-phase interventional clinical trials conducted in adults with lung cancer since database conception. We calculated the difference in age (DA) between the clinical trial populations and U.S. populations, using <em>t</em> test and one-sided analysis of variance to evaluate trial characteristics associated with DA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 141 clinical trials enrolling 7723 participants from 1998 to 2020. Early-phase lung cancer trial participants were, on average, 7.6 years younger than patients with lung cancer in the U.S. population (mean DA: −7.6 y, SD 4.2). Age disparities were magnified among clinical trials that were industry-sponsored (mean DA −8.5 versus −6.1, <em>p</em> = 0.001) and those limiting eligibility to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 (mean DA –8.0 versus −6.0, <em>p</em> = 0.040). There was no association between the median age of trial participants and the proportion of patients with serious adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Older adults remain underrepresented in early-phase lung cancer clinical trials. With the rapid expansion of novel cancer therapies, focused efforts in the design of early-phase trials are warranted to reflect real-world populations. Otherwise, limitations in the generalizability of treatment safety and efficacy may increase in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 10","pages":"Article 100873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older Adult Participation in Early-Phase Lung Cancer Clinical Trials, 1998 to 2020\",\"authors\":\"Desirae Ehley MD , Lilit Vardanyan MS , Rebecca S. Boxer MD, MS , Alex J. Fauer PhD , Shiruyeh Schokrpur MD, PhD , David Gandara MD , Jonathan W. Riess MD, MAS , Surbhi Singhal MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Despite advances, lung cancer treatment remains associated with substantial toxicity. Early-phase clinical trials inform the safety and efficacy of novel lung cancer treatments. Although older adults represent most patients with lung cancer, and they are underrepresented in phase 3 trials, age disparity in early-phase lung cancer trials is ill-defined.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We queried <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> to identify early-phase interventional clinical trials conducted in adults with lung cancer since database conception. We calculated the difference in age (DA) between the clinical trial populations and U.S. populations, using <em>t</em> test and one-sided analysis of variance to evaluate trial characteristics associated with DA.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 141 clinical trials enrolling 7723 participants from 1998 to 2020. Early-phase lung cancer trial participants were, on average, 7.6 years younger than patients with lung cancer in the U.S. population (mean DA: −7.6 y, SD 4.2). Age disparities were magnified among clinical trials that were industry-sponsored (mean DA −8.5 versus −6.1, <em>p</em> = 0.001) and those limiting eligibility to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 (mean DA –8.0 versus −6.0, <em>p</em> = 0.040). There was no association between the median age of trial participants and the proportion of patients with serious adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Older adults remain underrepresented in early-phase lung cancer clinical trials. With the rapid expansion of novel cancer therapies, focused efforts in the design of early-phase trials are warranted to reflect real-world populations. Otherwise, limitations in the generalizability of treatment safety and efficacy may increase in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364325000906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364325000906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Older Adult Participation in Early-Phase Lung Cancer Clinical Trials, 1998 to 2020
Objectives
Despite advances, lung cancer treatment remains associated with substantial toxicity. Early-phase clinical trials inform the safety and efficacy of novel lung cancer treatments. Although older adults represent most patients with lung cancer, and they are underrepresented in phase 3 trials, age disparity in early-phase lung cancer trials is ill-defined.
Methods
We queried ClinicalTrials.gov to identify early-phase interventional clinical trials conducted in adults with lung cancer since database conception. We calculated the difference in age (DA) between the clinical trial populations and U.S. populations, using t test and one-sided analysis of variance to evaluate trial characteristics associated with DA.
Results
We identified 141 clinical trials enrolling 7723 participants from 1998 to 2020. Early-phase lung cancer trial participants were, on average, 7.6 years younger than patients with lung cancer in the U.S. population (mean DA: −7.6 y, SD 4.2). Age disparities were magnified among clinical trials that were industry-sponsored (mean DA −8.5 versus −6.1, p = 0.001) and those limiting eligibility to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 (mean DA –8.0 versus −6.0, p = 0.040). There was no association between the median age of trial participants and the proportion of patients with serious adverse events.
Conclusions
Older adults remain underrepresented in early-phase lung cancer clinical trials. With the rapid expansion of novel cancer therapies, focused efforts in the design of early-phase trials are warranted to reflect real-world populations. Otherwise, limitations in the generalizability of treatment safety and efficacy may increase in the future.