Stuart C. Lau MSc , Natalie M. Czuczman MD , Liz Dennett MLIS , Matthew Hicks MD, PhD , Maria B. Ospina MSc, PhD
{"title":"系统回顾与荟萃分析:原住民儿童神经发育障碍的患病率","authors":"Stuart C. Lau MSc , Natalie M. Czuczman MD , Liz Dennett MLIS , Matthew Hicks MD, PhD , Maria B. Ospina MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To summarize epidemiological evidence on the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) among Indigenous children in Australia Canada, New Zealand, and the United States compared to that of non-Indigenous children.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Comprehensive searches in 5 electronic databases were performed to identify studies evaluating the prevalence of NDDs among Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Unadjusted pooled odds ratios (pOR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in random-effects meta-analysis by outcome and Indigenous group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1,274 non-duplicate citations identified, 12 studies were included in the review. Overall, cohort, ecological, and cross-sectional studies had moderate-to-high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed no differences in the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children and White children (pOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.79, 1.33). In addition, there were no differences in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between Australian Aboriginal children and non-Aboriginal children (pOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.11, 1.58). Non-Indigenous children were found to have higher ASD prevalence compared to Indigenous children in Canada. Some evidence suggests a greater burden of intellectual disabilities affecting Indigenous children in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, and specific learning disorders among AI/AN children in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Limited evidence suggests a difference in prevalence for specific NDD between Indigenous children and non-Indigenous children in countries with similar colonial histories. More epidemiological research adopting an Indigenous lens in the screening and assessment of NDD is required to better understand the burden of NDDs in Indigenous children.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) may disproportionately impact Indigenous children compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prevalence of NDDs among the two groups. A limited body of literature found some differences in NDDs between the two groups underscoring the need for more high-quality research to better understand the burden of NDDs among Indigenous children.</div></div><div><h3>Diversity & Inclusion Statement</h3><div>One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group.</div></div><div><h3>Study preregistration information</h3><div>Prevalence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders among Indigenous Children: A Systematic Review; <span><span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021238669</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 406-420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Prevalence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Indigenous Children\",\"authors\":\"Stuart C. Lau MSc , Natalie M. Czuczman MD , Liz Dennett MLIS , Matthew Hicks MD, PhD , Maria B. Ospina MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To summarize epidemiological evidence on the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) among Indigenous children in Australia Canada, New Zealand, and the United States compared to that of non-Indigenous children.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Comprehensive searches in 5 electronic databases were performed to identify studies evaluating the prevalence of NDDs among Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Unadjusted pooled odds ratios (pOR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in random-effects meta-analysis by outcome and Indigenous group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1,274 non-duplicate citations identified, 12 studies were included in the review. Overall, cohort, ecological, and cross-sectional studies had moderate-to-high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed no differences in the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children and White children (pOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.79, 1.33). In addition, there were no differences in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between Australian Aboriginal children and non-Aboriginal children (pOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.11, 1.58). Non-Indigenous children were found to have higher ASD prevalence compared to Indigenous children in Canada. Some evidence suggests a greater burden of intellectual disabilities affecting Indigenous children in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, and specific learning disorders among AI/AN children in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Limited evidence suggests a difference in prevalence for specific NDD between Indigenous children and non-Indigenous children in countries with similar colonial histories. More epidemiological research adopting an Indigenous lens in the screening and assessment of NDD is required to better understand the burden of NDDs in Indigenous children.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) may disproportionately impact Indigenous children compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prevalence of NDDs among the two groups. A limited body of literature found some differences in NDDs between the two groups underscoring the need for more high-quality research to better understand the burden of NDDs among Indigenous children.</div></div><div><h3>Diversity & Inclusion Statement</h3><div>One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group.</div></div><div><h3>Study preregistration information</h3><div>Prevalence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders among Indigenous Children: A Systematic Review; <span><span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021238669</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAACAP open\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 406-420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAACAP open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的总结澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和美国土著儿童与非土著儿童神经发育障碍(ndd)患病率的流行病学证据。方法对澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰和美国的5个电子数据库进行综合检索,以确定评估ndd在土著和非土著儿童中患病率的研究。在随机效应荟萃分析中,按结果和土著群体计算未经调整的合并优势比(pOR), 95%置信区间。结果在1274篇非重复引用中,12篇研究被纳入综述。总体而言,队列研究、生态研究和横断面研究具有中等至高度的偏倚风险。meta分析显示,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)儿童和白人儿童的注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患病率无差异(pOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.79, 1.33)。此外,澳大利亚土著儿童和非土著儿童在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患病率方面没有差异(pOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.11, 1.58)。与加拿大土著儿童相比,非土著儿童的ASD患病率更高。一些证据表明,澳大利亚、新西兰和美国土著儿童的智力障碍负担更大,美国AI/AN儿童的特殊学习障碍负担更大。结论有限的证据表明,在具有相似殖民历史的国家中,土著儿童和非土著儿童的特定NDD患病率存在差异。需要在筛查和评估NDD时采用土著视角进行更多的流行病学研究,以更好地了解土著儿童NDD的负担。与非土著儿童相比,神经发育障碍(ndd)对土著儿童的影响可能不成比例。本系统综述和荟萃分析检查了两组患者ndd的患病率。有限的文献发现两个群体在ndd方面存在一些差异,强调需要进行更多高质量的研究,以更好地了解土著儿童ndd的负担。多样性和包容性声明本文的一位或多位作者自认为是科学中一个或多个历史上未被充分代表的种族和/或族裔群体的成员。我们积极地在我们的作者群体中促进性别和性别平衡。在引用与本工作科学相关的参考文献的同时,我们还积极努力促进在我们的参考文献列表中纳入历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体。我们积极努力促进在我们的作者群体中纳入历史上代表性不足的种族和/或民族群体。原住民儿童神经发育障碍患病率:系统回顾https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021238669
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Prevalence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Indigenous Children
Objective
To summarize epidemiological evidence on the prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) among Indigenous children in Australia Canada, New Zealand, and the United States compared to that of non-Indigenous children.
Method
Comprehensive searches in 5 electronic databases were performed to identify studies evaluating the prevalence of NDDs among Indigenous and non-Indigenous children in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States. Unadjusted pooled odds ratios (pOR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in random-effects meta-analysis by outcome and Indigenous group.
Results
From 1,274 non-duplicate citations identified, 12 studies were included in the review. Overall, cohort, ecological, and cross-sectional studies had moderate-to-high risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed no differences in the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) children and White children (pOR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.79, 1.33). In addition, there were no differences in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between Australian Aboriginal children and non-Aboriginal children (pOR = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.11, 1.58). Non-Indigenous children were found to have higher ASD prevalence compared to Indigenous children in Canada. Some evidence suggests a greater burden of intellectual disabilities affecting Indigenous children in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, and specific learning disorders among AI/AN children in the United States.
Conclusion
Limited evidence suggests a difference in prevalence for specific NDD between Indigenous children and non-Indigenous children in countries with similar colonial histories. More epidemiological research adopting an Indigenous lens in the screening and assessment of NDD is required to better understand the burden of NDDs in Indigenous children.
Plain language summary
Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) may disproportionately impact Indigenous children compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prevalence of NDDs among the two groups. A limited body of literature found some differences in NDDs between the two groups underscoring the need for more high-quality research to better understand the burden of NDDs among Indigenous children.
Diversity & Inclusion Statement
One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group.
Study preregistration information
Prevalence of Neurodevelopmental Disorders among Indigenous Children: A Systematic Review; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021238669