M. Morfin , E. Savina , H.P. Benoît , M. Teixeira Alves , A. Albalat , T. Catchpole , C. Fox , M. McHugh , S. Méhault , H. Nilsson , M. Oliver , D. Valentinsson , M. Breen
{"title":"以欧洲海底拖网渔业中褐家鼠为例,对丢弃生存实验进行meta分析的建模框架","authors":"M. Morfin , E. Savina , H.P. Benoît , M. Teixeira Alves , A. Albalat , T. Catchpole , C. Fox , M. McHugh , S. Méhault , H. Nilsson , M. Oliver , D. Valentinsson , M. Breen","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Good knowledge of discard survival in commercial or recreational fisheries is key in enabling more accurate stock assessments and supporting evidence-based regulatory measures; however, estimating discard survival is challenging. To improve the estimation of survival rate at regional scales and to identify key drivers, we present here a meta-regression (MR) framework that considers differences in experimental design, quality and context specificity between individual studies. First, studies are filtered through a systematic critical review to exclude results considered too uncertain or potentially biased. Discard survival rates are then corrected to limit estimation method bias, and associated uncertainty is included as a weighting. The MR is finally applied under a hierarchical mixed-effects framework to account for the nested structure of the data and correct for experimentally induced mortality bias. We illustrate how the MR can address methodological and analytical limitations in discard survival studies using Norway lobster (<em>Nephrops norvegicus</em>) discarded from European demersal trawl fisheries. While some effects were already identified from single studies, such as the temperature change, the MR highlighted other effects not perceptible at a regional scale, varying more at the scale of the fishing operation, such as tow duration, but also related to the size of experimental subjects and physiology. This flexible framework has applicability to other species or contexts. The case study provided insights to make recommendations for future survival studies to improve the predictive potential of this type of MR, such as the importance of following standardized protocols and analyses, and to report data at the finest resolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50443,"journal":{"name":"Fisheries Research","volume":"290 ","pages":"Article 107513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modeling framework to meta-analyse discard survival experiments illustrated by Nephrops norvegicus in European demersal trawl fisheries\",\"authors\":\"M. Morfin , E. Savina , H.P. Benoît , M. Teixeira Alves , A. Albalat , T. Catchpole , C. Fox , M. McHugh , S. Méhault , H. Nilsson , M. Oliver , D. Valentinsson , M. Breen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fishres.2025.107513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Good knowledge of discard survival in commercial or recreational fisheries is key in enabling more accurate stock assessments and supporting evidence-based regulatory measures; however, estimating discard survival is challenging. To improve the estimation of survival rate at regional scales and to identify key drivers, we present here a meta-regression (MR) framework that considers differences in experimental design, quality and context specificity between individual studies. First, studies are filtered through a systematic critical review to exclude results considered too uncertain or potentially biased. Discard survival rates are then corrected to limit estimation method bias, and associated uncertainty is included as a weighting. The MR is finally applied under a hierarchical mixed-effects framework to account for the nested structure of the data and correct for experimentally induced mortality bias. We illustrate how the MR can address methodological and analytical limitations in discard survival studies using Norway lobster (<em>Nephrops norvegicus</em>) discarded from European demersal trawl fisheries. While some effects were already identified from single studies, such as the temperature change, the MR highlighted other effects not perceptible at a regional scale, varying more at the scale of the fishing operation, such as tow duration, but also related to the size of experimental subjects and physiology. This flexible framework has applicability to other species or contexts. The case study provided insights to make recommendations for future survival studies to improve the predictive potential of this type of MR, such as the importance of following standardized protocols and analyses, and to report data at the finest resolution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"volume\":\"290 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fisheries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625002504\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisheries Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783625002504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A modeling framework to meta-analyse discard survival experiments illustrated by Nephrops norvegicus in European demersal trawl fisheries
Good knowledge of discard survival in commercial or recreational fisheries is key in enabling more accurate stock assessments and supporting evidence-based regulatory measures; however, estimating discard survival is challenging. To improve the estimation of survival rate at regional scales and to identify key drivers, we present here a meta-regression (MR) framework that considers differences in experimental design, quality and context specificity between individual studies. First, studies are filtered through a systematic critical review to exclude results considered too uncertain or potentially biased. Discard survival rates are then corrected to limit estimation method bias, and associated uncertainty is included as a weighting. The MR is finally applied under a hierarchical mixed-effects framework to account for the nested structure of the data and correct for experimentally induced mortality bias. We illustrate how the MR can address methodological and analytical limitations in discard survival studies using Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) discarded from European demersal trawl fisheries. While some effects were already identified from single studies, such as the temperature change, the MR highlighted other effects not perceptible at a regional scale, varying more at the scale of the fishing operation, such as tow duration, but also related to the size of experimental subjects and physiology. This flexible framework has applicability to other species or contexts. The case study provided insights to make recommendations for future survival studies to improve the predictive potential of this type of MR, such as the importance of following standardized protocols and analyses, and to report data at the finest resolution.
期刊介绍:
This journal provides an international forum for the publication of papers in the areas of fisheries science, fishing technology, fisheries management and relevant socio-economics. The scope covers fisheries in salt, brackish and freshwater systems, and all aspects of associated ecology, environmental aspects of fisheries, and economics. Both theoretical and practical papers are acceptable, including laboratory and field experimental studies relevant to fisheries. Papers on the conservation of exploitable living resources are welcome. Review and Viewpoint articles are also published. As the specified areas inevitably impinge on and interrelate with each other, the approach of the journal is multidisciplinary, and authors are encouraged to emphasise the relevance of their own work to that of other disciplines. The journal is intended for fisheries scientists, biological oceanographers, gear technologists, economists, managers, administrators, policy makers and legislators.