Carl Fredrik Sjöland , Ye Htet Kyaw , Maxim Kan , Leo Ziegel , Keshab Deuba , Thiha Lin , Susanne Strömdahl , Fredrik Liljeros , Anders Hammarberg , Martin Kåberg , Aung Yu Naing , Anna Mia Ekström
{"title":"缅甸使用或注射毒品的人的阿片类药物过量和死亡率:一项基于登记册的大型研究","authors":"Carl Fredrik Sjöland , Ye Htet Kyaw , Maxim Kan , Leo Ziegel , Keshab Deuba , Thiha Lin , Susanne Strömdahl , Fredrik Liljeros , Anders Hammarberg , Martin Kåberg , Aung Yu Naing , Anna Mia Ekström","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Opioid overdose incidence in Myanmar has not been systematically measured. We quantified individual risk factors of overdose, overdose incidence and mortality, and examined predictors of pre‑overdose engagement with harm reduction services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Electronic registers from 21 Asian Harm Reduction Network–Best Shelter (AHRN–BS) sites in Sagaing, Kachin, and northern Shan (2014–2025) were linked. Incidence and mortality were calculated with the exact Poisson method. A retrospective cohort of 155,875 clients—65,089 people who inject drugs—was analyzed with modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for overdose; cases occurring in 2022–2025 were further analyzed for predictors of past‑year service engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Registers captured 3472 verified opioid overdoses in 2913 persons. Among people who inject drugs, pooled incidence was 16.8/1000 person‑years (95 % CI 16.2–17.5) and overdose mortality 0.5/1000 person‑years (0.4–0.7). Current injecting without opioid‑agonist therapy (OAT) carried an aPR 8.1 (95 % CI 6.1–10.6) relative to recent non‑injecting use, rising to aPR 10.7 (95 % CI 7.8–14.8) among those who also received OAT. Three‑quarters of overdoses (2598) occurred in persons not enrolled in harm reduction programs; incidence among enrolled clients was 5.7/1000 person-years (95 % CI 5.2–6.2). Migrants were less likely to have accessed services in the year preceding overdose (aPR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.68–0.98). Alcohol was reported in 70.5 % of events and stimulants in 7.2 %.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Opioid overdose is common and disproportionately affects people outside existing programs. Expanding peer‑led and mobile outreach, tailoring referral pathways for migrants, broadening community naloxone distribution, and securing sustained domestic financing are urgent priorities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 104968"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioid overdose and mortality among people who use or inject drugs in Myanmar: A large register-based study\",\"authors\":\"Carl Fredrik Sjöland , Ye Htet Kyaw , Maxim Kan , Leo Ziegel , Keshab Deuba , Thiha Lin , Susanne Strömdahl , Fredrik Liljeros , Anders Hammarberg , Martin Kåberg , Aung Yu Naing , Anna Mia Ekström\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Opioid overdose incidence in Myanmar has not been systematically measured. We quantified individual risk factors of overdose, overdose incidence and mortality, and examined predictors of pre‑overdose engagement with harm reduction services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Electronic registers from 21 Asian Harm Reduction Network–Best Shelter (AHRN–BS) sites in Sagaing, Kachin, and northern Shan (2014–2025) were linked. Incidence and mortality were calculated with the exact Poisson method. A retrospective cohort of 155,875 clients—65,089 people who inject drugs—was analyzed with modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for overdose; cases occurring in 2022–2025 were further analyzed for predictors of past‑year service engagement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Registers captured 3472 verified opioid overdoses in 2913 persons. Among people who inject drugs, pooled incidence was 16.8/1000 person‑years (95 % CI 16.2–17.5) and overdose mortality 0.5/1000 person‑years (0.4–0.7). Current injecting without opioid‑agonist therapy (OAT) carried an aPR 8.1 (95 % CI 6.1–10.6) relative to recent non‑injecting use, rising to aPR 10.7 (95 % CI 7.8–14.8) among those who also received OAT. Three‑quarters of overdoses (2598) occurred in persons not enrolled in harm reduction programs; incidence among enrolled clients was 5.7/1000 person-years (95 % CI 5.2–6.2). Migrants were less likely to have accessed services in the year preceding overdose (aPR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.68–0.98). Alcohol was reported in 70.5 % of events and stimulants in 7.2 %.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Opioid overdose is common and disproportionately affects people outside existing programs. Expanding peer‑led and mobile outreach, tailoring referral pathways for migrants, broadening community naloxone distribution, and securing sustained domestic financing are urgent priorities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"145 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002646\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:缅甸的阿片类药物过量发生率尚未得到系统的测量。我们量化了药物过量、药物过量发生率和死亡率的个体危险因素,并检查了药物过量前参与减少危害服务的预测因素。方法对2014-2025年在实皆、克钦邦和掸邦北部的21个亚洲减少危害网络最佳庇护所(AHRN-BS)站点的电子登记进行链接。发病率和死亡率用精确泊松法计算。采用修正泊松回归对155,875名客户(65,089名注射吸毒者)的回顾性队列进行分析,以估计药物过量的调整患病率(aPR);进一步分析了2022-2025年发生的案例,以预测过去一年的服务参与度。结果在2913人中登记了3472例阿片类药物过量。在注射吸毒者中,总发病率为16.8/1000人年(95% CI 16.2-17.5),过量死亡率为0.5/1000人年(0.4-0.7)。目前注射无阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)相对于近期非注射使用的aPR为8.1 (95% CI 6.1-10.6),在接受OAT的患者中上升至aPR 10.7 (95% CI 7.8-14.8)。四分之三的过量用药(2598例)发生在未参加减少危害规划的人员中;入组患者的发病率为5.7/1000人年(95% CI 5.2-6.2)。移民在过量用药前一年获得服务的可能性较小(aPR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.98)。酒精和兴奋剂分别占70.5%和7.2%。阿片类药物过量是常见的,不成比例地影响现有计划之外的人。扩大以同伴为主导的外联和移动外联,为移徙者量身定制转诊途径,扩大社区纳洛酮分发,以及确保持续的国内融资,是紧迫的优先事项。
Opioid overdose and mortality among people who use or inject drugs in Myanmar: A large register-based study
Background
Opioid overdose incidence in Myanmar has not been systematically measured. We quantified individual risk factors of overdose, overdose incidence and mortality, and examined predictors of pre‑overdose engagement with harm reduction services.
Methods
Electronic registers from 21 Asian Harm Reduction Network–Best Shelter (AHRN–BS) sites in Sagaing, Kachin, and northern Shan (2014–2025) were linked. Incidence and mortality were calculated with the exact Poisson method. A retrospective cohort of 155,875 clients—65,089 people who inject drugs—was analyzed with modified Poisson regression to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) for overdose; cases occurring in 2022–2025 were further analyzed for predictors of past‑year service engagement.
Results
Registers captured 3472 verified opioid overdoses in 2913 persons. Among people who inject drugs, pooled incidence was 16.8/1000 person‑years (95 % CI 16.2–17.5) and overdose mortality 0.5/1000 person‑years (0.4–0.7). Current injecting without opioid‑agonist therapy (OAT) carried an aPR 8.1 (95 % CI 6.1–10.6) relative to recent non‑injecting use, rising to aPR 10.7 (95 % CI 7.8–14.8) among those who also received OAT. Three‑quarters of overdoses (2598) occurred in persons not enrolled in harm reduction programs; incidence among enrolled clients was 5.7/1000 person-years (95 % CI 5.2–6.2). Migrants were less likely to have accessed services in the year preceding overdose (aPR 0.82, 95 % CI 0.68–0.98). Alcohol was reported in 70.5 % of events and stimulants in 7.2 %.
Discussion
Opioid overdose is common and disproportionately affects people outside existing programs. Expanding peer‑led and mobile outreach, tailoring referral pathways for migrants, broadening community naloxone distribution, and securing sustained domestic financing are urgent priorities.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.