A. J. Blance, A. R. Lennox, D. A. Rothery, M. Balme, J. Wright, V. Galluzzi, S. J. Conway
{"title":"月球和水星环形山周围的叶状形态:源自山体滑坡、喷出物流和修正阶段崩塌","authors":"A. J. Blance, A. R. Lennox, D. A. Rothery, M. Balme, J. Wright, V. Galluzzi, S. J. Conway","doi":"10.1029/2025JE008980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lobate forms emanate from impact craters and have morphologies indicating ground-hugging emplacement via flow. We present global surveys of lobate forms on the Moon and Mercury. Very few examples have previously been reported on either body, with debate over their interpretation as either crater rim landslides or ejecta flows. We identify 92 lobate forms on the Moon, and 98 on Mercury, a significant increase on previously reported examples. 98% extend downslope into an adjacent or overlapped antecedent crater. Lobate forms are directly linked to impact cratering processes: evidence for syn-impact formation, including impact melt on top of lobate forms, suggests ∼71% formed due to exterior collapse of source crater material into antecedent craters during source crater modification. 24% of examples instead appear to be landslides on antecedent crater rims, triggered by the newer impact. Understanding the formation of these features therefore provides new insight into impact cratering and mass movements processes. Equivalent lobe mobilities and occurrence rates on the volatile-depleted Moon and the somewhat volatile-enriched Mercury suggest volatiles are not necessary for formation. However, lobate form mobilities on the Moon and Mercury are lower than for comparable martian features, thought to require ground-ice to form, potentially supporting the idea that very high volatile content enables more mobile mass movements. Two lobate forms on flat ground (Hokusai and Piazzolla craters, Mercury) are morphologically similar to martian layered ejecta, possibly indicating a more significant influence of volatiles for these examples or a more enigmatic formation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE008980","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lobate Forms Around Craters on the Moon and Mercury: Origin From Landslides, Ejecta Flows and Modification Stage Collapse\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Blance, A. R. Lennox, D. A. Rothery, M. Balme, J. Wright, V. Galluzzi, S. J. Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JE008980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lobate forms emanate from impact craters and have morphologies indicating ground-hugging emplacement via flow. We present global surveys of lobate forms on the Moon and Mercury. Very few examples have previously been reported on either body, with debate over their interpretation as either crater rim landslides or ejecta flows. We identify 92 lobate forms on the Moon, and 98 on Mercury, a significant increase on previously reported examples. 98% extend downslope into an adjacent or overlapped antecedent crater. Lobate forms are directly linked to impact cratering processes: evidence for syn-impact formation, including impact melt on top of lobate forms, suggests ∼71% formed due to exterior collapse of source crater material into antecedent craters during source crater modification. 24% of examples instead appear to be landslides on antecedent crater rims, triggered by the newer impact. Understanding the formation of these features therefore provides new insight into impact cratering and mass movements processes. Equivalent lobe mobilities and occurrence rates on the volatile-depleted Moon and the somewhat volatile-enriched Mercury suggest volatiles are not necessary for formation. However, lobate form mobilities on the Moon and Mercury are lower than for comparable martian features, thought to require ground-ice to form, potentially supporting the idea that very high volatile content enables more mobile mass movements. Two lobate forms on flat ground (Hokusai and Piazzolla craters, Mercury) are morphologically similar to martian layered ejecta, possibly indicating a more significant influence of volatiles for these examples or a more enigmatic formation process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":\"130 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JE008980\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008980\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JE008980","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lobate Forms Around Craters on the Moon and Mercury: Origin From Landslides, Ejecta Flows and Modification Stage Collapse
Lobate forms emanate from impact craters and have morphologies indicating ground-hugging emplacement via flow. We present global surveys of lobate forms on the Moon and Mercury. Very few examples have previously been reported on either body, with debate over their interpretation as either crater rim landslides or ejecta flows. We identify 92 lobate forms on the Moon, and 98 on Mercury, a significant increase on previously reported examples. 98% extend downslope into an adjacent or overlapped antecedent crater. Lobate forms are directly linked to impact cratering processes: evidence for syn-impact formation, including impact melt on top of lobate forms, suggests ∼71% formed due to exterior collapse of source crater material into antecedent craters during source crater modification. 24% of examples instead appear to be landslides on antecedent crater rims, triggered by the newer impact. Understanding the formation of these features therefore provides new insight into impact cratering and mass movements processes. Equivalent lobe mobilities and occurrence rates on the volatile-depleted Moon and the somewhat volatile-enriched Mercury suggest volatiles are not necessary for formation. However, lobate form mobilities on the Moon and Mercury are lower than for comparable martian features, thought to require ground-ice to form, potentially supporting the idea that very high volatile content enables more mobile mass movements. Two lobate forms on flat ground (Hokusai and Piazzolla craters, Mercury) are morphologically similar to martian layered ejecta, possibly indicating a more significant influence of volatiles for these examples or a more enigmatic formation process.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.