工作年龄成人和儿童的多代生活和心理健康结果——范围系统评价

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Abbeygail Jones, Daniel Pugh, Vaughan Bell, Keri Ka-Yee Wong
{"title":"工作年龄成人和儿童的多代生活和心理健康结果——范围系统评价","authors":"Abbeygail Jones,&nbsp;Daniel Pugh,&nbsp;Vaughan Bell,&nbsp;Keri Ka-Yee Wong","doi":"10.1155/hsc/7513142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Household compositions can impact health-related outcomes. However, the definition of multigenerational living and its associations with mental health outcomes in adults and children are unclear.</p><p><b>Method:</b> A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in Embase, PsycInfo and Medline via OVID, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Two raters identified 112 reports for full paper reviews and 62 papers for data extraction. Quality ratings and certainty of evidence were assessed, and data were narratively synthesised.</p><p><b>Results:</b> There were 289,071 participants across studies. Ten studies recruited samples of children/young people. The average quality rating was 7.8 (out of 10) and the certainty of evidence was low. Definitions of multigenerational living and associations with mental health outcomes were heterogeneous, indicating the role of moderating factors, and a need for better operationalisation in future research.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Findings have implications for clinical practice when conducting assessments and formulating psychological difficulties. There are further implications for researchers and policymakers responsible for housing and healthcare provision. The broad search strategy and specification of only anxiety and depression in the search strategy are limitations of the review, despite the scoping aims. A consensus definition of multigenerational living could benefit future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/7513142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multigenerational Living and Mental Health Outcomes of Working-Age Adults and Children—A Scoping Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Abbeygail Jones,&nbsp;Daniel Pugh,&nbsp;Vaughan Bell,&nbsp;Keri Ka-Yee Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/7513142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> Household compositions can impact health-related outcomes. However, the definition of multigenerational living and its associations with mental health outcomes in adults and children are unclear.</p><p><b>Method:</b> A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in Embase, PsycInfo and Medline via OVID, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Two raters identified 112 reports for full paper reviews and 62 papers for data extraction. Quality ratings and certainty of evidence were assessed, and data were narratively synthesised.</p><p><b>Results:</b> There were 289,071 participants across studies. Ten studies recruited samples of children/young people. The average quality rating was 7.8 (out of 10) and the certainty of evidence was low. Definitions of multigenerational living and associations with mental health outcomes were heterogeneous, indicating the role of moderating factors, and a need for better operationalisation in future research.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Findings have implications for clinical practice when conducting assessments and formulating psychological difficulties. There are further implications for researchers and policymakers responsible for housing and healthcare provision. The broad search strategy and specification of only anxiety and depression in the search strategy are limitations of the review, despite the scoping aims. A consensus definition of multigenerational living could benefit future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/7513142\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/7513142\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/7513142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家庭构成可以影响健康相关的结果。然而,多代生活的定义及其与成人和儿童心理健康结果的关系尚不清楚。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。检索通过OVID、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆在Embase、PsycInfo和Medline进行。两名评判员确定了112篇论文用于全文评审,62篇论文用于数据提取。评估了证据的质量评级和确定性,并对数据进行了叙述性综合。结果:共有289071名研究参与者。10项研究招募了儿童/青少年样本。平均质量评分为7.8分(满分10分),证据的确定性较低。多代同代人生活的定义及其与心理健康结果的关联是不同的,这表明调节因素的作用,需要在未来的研究中更好地进行操作。结论:研究结果对临床实践进行评估和制定心理困难具有指导意义。这对负责住房和医疗保健提供的研究人员和政策制定者有进一步的影响。广泛的搜索策略和在搜索策略中只指定焦虑和抑郁是本综述的局限性,尽管有范围界定的目标。对多代同堂生活的一致定义可能有利于未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multigenerational Living and Mental Health Outcomes of Working-Age Adults and Children—A Scoping Systematic Review

Multigenerational Living and Mental Health Outcomes of Working-Age Adults and Children—A Scoping Systematic Review

Background: Household compositions can impact health-related outcomes. However, the definition of multigenerational living and its associations with mental health outcomes in adults and children are unclear.

Method: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in Embase, PsycInfo and Medline via OVID, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Two raters identified 112 reports for full paper reviews and 62 papers for data extraction. Quality ratings and certainty of evidence were assessed, and data were narratively synthesised.

Results: There were 289,071 participants across studies. Ten studies recruited samples of children/young people. The average quality rating was 7.8 (out of 10) and the certainty of evidence was low. Definitions of multigenerational living and associations with mental health outcomes were heterogeneous, indicating the role of moderating factors, and a need for better operationalisation in future research.

Conclusions: Findings have implications for clinical practice when conducting assessments and formulating psychological difficulties. There are further implications for researchers and policymakers responsible for housing and healthcare provision. The broad search strategy and specification of only anxiety and depression in the search strategy are limitations of the review, despite the scoping aims. A consensus definition of multigenerational living could benefit future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信