法医精神卫生单位工作人员对服务使用者使用电子烟的经验和观点:一项定性访谈研究

Q3 Medicine
Amy Bannerman, Oyinlola Oyebode, Nicholas Stokes, Sophie Coronini-Cronberg
{"title":"法医精神卫生单位工作人员对服务使用者使用电子烟的经验和观点:一项定性访谈研究","authors":"Amy Bannerman,&nbsp;Oyinlola Oyebode,&nbsp;Nicholas Stokes,&nbsp;Sophie Coronini-Cronberg","doi":"10.1002/lim2.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Smoking rates among forensic mental health service users are significantly higher than in the general population, exacerbating health inequalities. Although the long-term health effects of e-cigarettes are still unclear, they offer a potential harm-reduction strategy for smoking cessation. The introduction of e-cigarettes in complex forensic environments poses logistical challenges, safety concerns and varying needs for both service users and staff. Inconsistencies in e-cigarette policies across UK forensic settings are partly due to a lack of national guidelines. This study aims to explore staff perspectives in these settings to inform future guidelines and practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff from low- and medium-security units within West London Forensic Services (WLFS) between September and November 2023. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen staff members, with a median tenure of 12 years, participated. E-cigarettes were seen as temporary substitutes rather than effective cessation aids, with many service users returning to smoking after discharge. Instances of misuse, including self-harm, trading and aggression, were reported, affecting clinical interventions and posing risks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Frequent incidents related to e-cigarettes in forensic mental health settings pose risks to staff and service users with uncertain impact on smoking cessation, challenging the harm-reduction principles underpinning their use.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":74076,"journal":{"name":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.70039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and Perspectives of Staff Working in a Forensic Mental Health Unit on the Use of E-Cigarettes by Service Users: A Qualitative Interview Study\",\"authors\":\"Amy Bannerman,&nbsp;Oyinlola Oyebode,&nbsp;Nicholas Stokes,&nbsp;Sophie Coronini-Cronberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lim2.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Smoking rates among forensic mental health service users are significantly higher than in the general population, exacerbating health inequalities. Although the long-term health effects of e-cigarettes are still unclear, they offer a potential harm-reduction strategy for smoking cessation. The introduction of e-cigarettes in complex forensic environments poses logistical challenges, safety concerns and varying needs for both service users and staff. Inconsistencies in e-cigarette policies across UK forensic settings are partly due to a lack of national guidelines. This study aims to explore staff perspectives in these settings to inform future guidelines and practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff from low- and medium-security units within West London Forensic Services (WLFS) between September and November 2023. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighteen staff members, with a median tenure of 12 years, participated. E-cigarettes were seen as temporary substitutes rather than effective cessation aids, with many service users returning to smoking after discharge. Instances of misuse, including self-harm, trading and aggression, were reported, affecting clinical interventions and posing risks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Frequent incidents related to e-cigarettes in forensic mental health settings pose risks to staff and service users with uncertain impact on smoking cessation, challenging the harm-reduction principles underpinning their use.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lim2.70039\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.70039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lifestyle medicine (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lim2.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:法医心理健康服务使用者的吸烟率明显高于一般人群,加剧了健康不平等。尽管电子烟对健康的长期影响尚不清楚,但它们为戒烟提供了一种潜在的减少危害的策略。在复杂的法医环境中引入电子烟给服务用户和工作人员带来了后勤挑战、安全问题和不同的需求。英国法医机构的电子烟政策不一致,部分原因是缺乏全国性的指导方针。本研究旨在探讨员工在这些情况下的观点,为未来的指导方针和实践提供信息。方法于2023年9月至11月对西伦敦法医服务(WLFS)中低保安单位的工作人员进行定性半结构化访谈。专题分析用于确定关键主题。调查结果18名工作人员参加了调查,平均任期为12年。电子烟被视为临时替代品,而不是有效的戒烟辅助工具,许多服务使用者在出院后又重新吸烟。据报告,包括自残、交易和侵略在内的滥用行为影响了临床干预并构成风险。法医精神卫生机构中与电子烟有关的频繁事件对工作人员和服务使用者构成风险,对戒烟产生不确定的影响,挑战了使用电子烟所依据的减少危害原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and Perspectives of Staff Working in a Forensic Mental Health Unit on the Use of E-Cigarettes by Service Users: A Qualitative Interview Study

Background

Smoking rates among forensic mental health service users are significantly higher than in the general population, exacerbating health inequalities. Although the long-term health effects of e-cigarettes are still unclear, they offer a potential harm-reduction strategy for smoking cessation. The introduction of e-cigarettes in complex forensic environments poses logistical challenges, safety concerns and varying needs for both service users and staff. Inconsistencies in e-cigarette policies across UK forensic settings are partly due to a lack of national guidelines. This study aims to explore staff perspectives in these settings to inform future guidelines and practices.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff from low- and medium-security units within West London Forensic Services (WLFS) between September and November 2023. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.

Findings

Eighteen staff members, with a median tenure of 12 years, participated. E-cigarettes were seen as temporary substitutes rather than effective cessation aids, with many service users returning to smoking after discharge. Instances of misuse, including self-harm, trading and aggression, were reported, affecting clinical interventions and posing risks.

Interpretation

Frequent incidents related to e-cigarettes in forensic mental health settings pose risks to staff and service users with uncertain impact on smoking cessation, challenging the harm-reduction principles underpinning their use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信