Ying Zhang , Jack Reid , Deepa Jeyakumar , Kapitolina Semenova , Naqvi Kiran , Lisa Lee , Angela Fleishman , Sherif Rezk , Xiaohui Zhao , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera
{"title":"慢性髓性白血病患者的不利疾病进展和并发t(6;9)易位(DEK::NUP214融合)或倒位16 (CBFB::MYH11融合)","authors":"Ying Zhang , Jack Reid , Deepa Jeyakumar , Kapitolina Semenova , Naqvi Kiran , Lisa Lee , Angela Fleishman , Sherif Rezk , Xiaohui Zhao , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The occurrence of additional specific chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (pH+) cells is associated with disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and is considered a marker that defines the accelerated/blast phase of CML. Both DEK::NUP214 fusion and CBFB rearrangement are extremely rare in CML, and their prognostic significance is unknown. Here we present two CML cases, with one case having concurrent translocation 6;9 [t(6;9)] leading to DEK::NUP214 fusion, and the other one presenting with concurrent inversion 16 -inv(16)- leading to CBFB::MYH11 fusion. The t(6;9) is usually associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. In this case, the patient failed to achieve remission and expired. This suggests that the t(6;9) is also associated with poor prognosis in CML. However, more data is needed to verify this association. Detection of inv(16) by karyotyping is technically challenging. In addition, FISH for CBFB is not usually run in the context of CML, thus raising the possibility that similar cases may have been underdiagnosed. With the routine use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, more patients like this one should be diagnosed and treated accordingly. These cases illustrate the importance of a comprehensive molecular/cytogenetic diagnostic work-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":"298 ","pages":"Pages 20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unfavorable disease progression in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and concurrent t(6;9) translocation (DEK::NUP214 fusion) or inversion 16 (CBFB::MYH11 fusion)\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zhang , Jack Reid , Deepa Jeyakumar , Kapitolina Semenova , Naqvi Kiran , Lisa Lee , Angela Fleishman , Sherif Rezk , Xiaohui Zhao , Fabiola Quintero-Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cancergen.2025.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The occurrence of additional specific chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (pH+) cells is associated with disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and is considered a marker that defines the accelerated/blast phase of CML. Both DEK::NUP214 fusion and CBFB rearrangement are extremely rare in CML, and their prognostic significance is unknown. Here we present two CML cases, with one case having concurrent translocation 6;9 [t(6;9)] leading to DEK::NUP214 fusion, and the other one presenting with concurrent inversion 16 -inv(16)- leading to CBFB::MYH11 fusion. The t(6;9) is usually associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. In this case, the patient failed to achieve remission and expired. This suggests that the t(6;9) is also associated with poor prognosis in CML. However, more data is needed to verify this association. Detection of inv(16) by karyotyping is technically challenging. In addition, FISH for CBFB is not usually run in the context of CML, thus raising the possibility that similar cases may have been underdiagnosed. With the routine use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, more patients like this one should be diagnosed and treated accordingly. These cases illustrate the importance of a comprehensive molecular/cytogenetic diagnostic work-up.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"volume\":\"298 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 20-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776225000985\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776225000985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unfavorable disease progression in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and concurrent t(6;9) translocation (DEK::NUP214 fusion) or inversion 16 (CBFB::MYH11 fusion)
The occurrence of additional specific chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (pH+) cells is associated with disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and is considered a marker that defines the accelerated/blast phase of CML. Both DEK::NUP214 fusion and CBFB rearrangement are extremely rare in CML, and their prognostic significance is unknown. Here we present two CML cases, with one case having concurrent translocation 6;9 [t(6;9)] leading to DEK::NUP214 fusion, and the other one presenting with concurrent inversion 16 -inv(16)- leading to CBFB::MYH11 fusion. The t(6;9) is usually associated with poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. In this case, the patient failed to achieve remission and expired. This suggests that the t(6;9) is also associated with poor prognosis in CML. However, more data is needed to verify this association. Detection of inv(16) by karyotyping is technically challenging. In addition, FISH for CBFB is not usually run in the context of CML, thus raising the possibility that similar cases may have been underdiagnosed. With the routine use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, more patients like this one should be diagnosed and treated accordingly. These cases illustrate the importance of a comprehensive molecular/cytogenetic diagnostic work-up.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.