影像引导粒子治疗四肢肿瘤的实践模式:欧洲粒子治疗网络的一个特定地点的多机构调查

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lorenzo Placidi , Juliette Thariat , Alexandru Dasu , Markus Stock , Iuliana Toma-Dasu , Petra Trnková , Julia Thiele , Akmal Ahmed Safwat , Maria Rosaria Fiore , Pavel Vitek , Alessia Pica , Lamberto Widesott , Aswin Hoffmann , Alessandra Bolsi
{"title":"影像引导粒子治疗四肢肿瘤的实践模式:欧洲粒子治疗网络的一个特定地点的多机构调查","authors":"Lorenzo Placidi ,&nbsp;Juliette Thariat ,&nbsp;Alexandru Dasu ,&nbsp;Markus Stock ,&nbsp;Iuliana Toma-Dasu ,&nbsp;Petra Trnková ,&nbsp;Julia Thiele ,&nbsp;Akmal Ahmed Safwat ,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Fiore ,&nbsp;Pavel Vitek ,&nbsp;Alessia Pica ,&nbsp;Lamberto Widesott ,&nbsp;Aswin Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Alessandra Bolsi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the current practice patterns in image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for extremities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multi-institutional survey was distributed to European particle therapy centres to analyse the current practice of IGPT for tumours of the extremities. A Delphi consensus analysis was developed to define minimum requirements and optimal workflow for clinical practice within eight centres participating in the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight centres participated in the survey. Patient immobilization methods varied, with supine position being optimal for selected tumor locations in most of the centres and prone position being optional in some centres. Multimodal imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was routinely used for across all centres, especially for delineation. Setup verification involved 2D imaging predominantly, with a few centres employing 3D imaging. Imaging for treatment evaluation varied, with differing intervals between treatment and first control computer tomography (CT) scans. Current limitations highlighted the need for improved software tools, streamlined workflow processes, and more comprehensive guidelines. Five centres participated in the Delphi consensus analysis. The full consensus was reached on the use of specific imaging modalities, adaptive techniques, and dedicated protocols for paediatric patients, with a need for standardization and guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There are differences in extremity IGPT clinical practice among European particle therapy centres. The optimal workflow identified by the expert consensus has not yet been reached, partly due to the small number of patients treated annually. To standardize clinical practice and improve IGPT quality for extremity tumours, consensus guidelines are strongly needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of practice of image guided particle therapy for extremity tumours: A site specific multi-institutional survey of European particle therapy network\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Placidi ,&nbsp;Juliette Thariat ,&nbsp;Alexandru Dasu ,&nbsp;Markus Stock ,&nbsp;Iuliana Toma-Dasu ,&nbsp;Petra Trnková ,&nbsp;Julia Thiele ,&nbsp;Akmal Ahmed Safwat ,&nbsp;Maria Rosaria Fiore ,&nbsp;Pavel Vitek ,&nbsp;Alessia Pica ,&nbsp;Lamberto Widesott ,&nbsp;Aswin Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Alessandra Bolsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate the current practice patterns in image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for extremities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multi-institutional survey was distributed to European particle therapy centres to analyse the current practice of IGPT for tumours of the extremities. A Delphi consensus analysis was developed to define minimum requirements and optimal workflow for clinical practice within eight centres participating in the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight centres participated in the survey. Patient immobilization methods varied, with supine position being optimal for selected tumor locations in most of the centres and prone position being optional in some centres. Multimodal imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was routinely used for across all centres, especially for delineation. Setup verification involved 2D imaging predominantly, with a few centres employing 3D imaging. Imaging for treatment evaluation varied, with differing intervals between treatment and first control computer tomography (CT) scans. Current limitations highlighted the need for improved software tools, streamlined workflow processes, and more comprehensive guidelines. Five centres participated in the Delphi consensus analysis. The full consensus was reached on the use of specific imaging modalities, adaptive techniques, and dedicated protocols for paediatric patients, with a need for standardization and guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There are differences in extremity IGPT clinical practice among European particle therapy centres. The optimal workflow identified by the expert consensus has not yet been reached, partly due to the small number of patients treated annually. To standardize clinical practice and improve IGPT quality for extremity tumours, consensus guidelines are strongly needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725002042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725002042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨影像引导下四肢质子治疗(IGPT)的实践模式。方法对欧洲粒子治疗中心进行多机构调查,分析IGPT治疗四肢肿瘤的现状。在参与欧洲粒子治疗网络(EPTN)的8个中心中,开发了德尔福共识分析来定义临床实践的最低要求和最佳工作流程。结果8个中心参与了调查。患者的固定方法各不相同,在大多数中心,对于选定的肿瘤位置,仰卧位是最佳的,而在一些中心,俯卧位是可选的。多模态成像,特别是磁共振成像(MRI),常规用于所有中心,特别是圈定。安装验证主要涉及2D成像,少数中心采用3D成像。用于治疗评估的影像各不相同,在治疗和首次对照计算机断层扫描(CT)之间有不同的间隔。当前的限制突出了对改进的软件工具、简化的工作流程和更全面的指导方针的需要。五个中心参加了德尔菲共识分析。针对儿科患者使用特定成像模式、适应性技术和专用方案达成了充分共识,需要制定标准化和指南。结论欧洲粒子治疗中心在肢体IGPT临床应用方面存在差异。专家共识确定的最佳工作流程尚未达成,部分原因是每年治疗的患者数量较少。为了规范临床实践,提高IGPT治疗四肢肿瘤的质量,迫切需要达成共识的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of practice of image guided particle therapy for extremity tumours: A site specific multi-institutional survey of European particle therapy network

Purpose

To investigate the current practice patterns in image-guided proton therapy (IGPT) for extremities.

Methods

A multi-institutional survey was distributed to European particle therapy centres to analyse the current practice of IGPT for tumours of the extremities. A Delphi consensus analysis was developed to define minimum requirements and optimal workflow for clinical practice within eight centres participating in the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN).

Results

Eight centres participated in the survey. Patient immobilization methods varied, with supine position being optimal for selected tumor locations in most of the centres and prone position being optional in some centres. Multimodal imaging, in particular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was routinely used for across all centres, especially for delineation. Setup verification involved 2D imaging predominantly, with a few centres employing 3D imaging. Imaging for treatment evaluation varied, with differing intervals between treatment and first control computer tomography (CT) scans. Current limitations highlighted the need for improved software tools, streamlined workflow processes, and more comprehensive guidelines. Five centres participated in the Delphi consensus analysis. The full consensus was reached on the use of specific imaging modalities, adaptive techniques, and dedicated protocols for paediatric patients, with a need for standardization and guidelines.

Conclusion

There are differences in extremity IGPT clinical practice among European particle therapy centres. The optimal workflow identified by the expert consensus has not yet been reached, partly due to the small number of patients treated annually. To standardize clinical practice and improve IGPT quality for extremity tumours, consensus guidelines are strongly needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信