{"title":"通过使用组织等效聚合物凝胶与光束距离测量的直接比较来验证原声距离","authors":"Takeshi Miyashita , Ye Chen , Yasutoshi Kuriyama , Masashi Tomida , Hidenobu Tachibana , Yoshihisa Iwashita , Takayuki Nonoyama , Sena Hidani , Taichi Murakami , Taeko Matsuura","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Protoacoustics offers a promising method for in vivo range verification in proton therapy. To experimentally assess the protoacoustic range accuracy, conventional tissue-mimicking phantoms (TMPs) often require Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to estimate the ground truth. However, limited knowledge of material properties and/or insufficient fine-tuning of dose models can introduce range errors in MC simulations. This study aims to propose a TMP capable of measuring the dose distribution concurrently with the protoacoustic measurement, thereby circumventing the need for MC simulations and their associated uncertainties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Normoxic <em>N</em>-vinylpyrrolidone-based polymer gel dosimeters were employed as TMPs. Two gel dosimeters of varying sizes were irradiated with a 226.5 MeV proton beam from a clinical synchrocyclotron. Post-irradiation, magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the beam range within the gels. Concurrently, protoacoustic ranges were measured using an optical hydrophone, employing both a time-of-arrival (TOA) method and an acoustic simulation-based approach. The ranges obtained from the gel dosimeters were then compared with those from the protoacoustic methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The range differences between the gel dosimeter measurements and both protoacoustic methods were within 1 mm for both gel sizes. In contrast, the maximum deviation between the protoacoustic range and the MC simulation-derived range was 2.1 mm, potentially attributable to inaccuracies in the assumed material properties within the MC simulation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Polymer gel dosimeters provide a direct method for validating protoacoustic beam range measurements in clinical proton beams, circumventing the reliance on MC simulations and their associated uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protoacoustic range verification by direct comparison with beam range measurements using a tissue-equivalent polymer gel\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Miyashita , Ye Chen , Yasutoshi Kuriyama , Masashi Tomida , Hidenobu Tachibana , Yoshihisa Iwashita , Takayuki Nonoyama , Sena Hidani , Taichi Murakami , Taeko Matsuura\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Protoacoustics offers a promising method for in vivo range verification in proton therapy. To experimentally assess the protoacoustic range accuracy, conventional tissue-mimicking phantoms (TMPs) often require Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to estimate the ground truth. However, limited knowledge of material properties and/or insufficient fine-tuning of dose models can introduce range errors in MC simulations. This study aims to propose a TMP capable of measuring the dose distribution concurrently with the protoacoustic measurement, thereby circumventing the need for MC simulations and their associated uncertainties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Normoxic <em>N</em>-vinylpyrrolidone-based polymer gel dosimeters were employed as TMPs. Two gel dosimeters of varying sizes were irradiated with a 226.5 MeV proton beam from a clinical synchrocyclotron. Post-irradiation, magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the beam range within the gels. Concurrently, protoacoustic ranges were measured using an optical hydrophone, employing both a time-of-arrival (TOA) method and an acoustic simulation-based approach. The ranges obtained from the gel dosimeters were then compared with those from the protoacoustic methods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The range differences between the gel dosimeter measurements and both protoacoustic methods were within 1 mm for both gel sizes. In contrast, the maximum deviation between the protoacoustic range and the MC simulation-derived range was 2.1 mm, potentially attributable to inaccuracies in the assumed material properties within the MC simulation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Polymer gel dosimeters provide a direct method for validating protoacoustic beam range measurements in clinical proton beams, circumventing the reliance on MC simulations and their associated uncertainties.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725002091\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725002091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protoacoustic range verification by direct comparison with beam range measurements using a tissue-equivalent polymer gel
Background and purpose
Protoacoustics offers a promising method for in vivo range verification in proton therapy. To experimentally assess the protoacoustic range accuracy, conventional tissue-mimicking phantoms (TMPs) often require Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to estimate the ground truth. However, limited knowledge of material properties and/or insufficient fine-tuning of dose models can introduce range errors in MC simulations. This study aims to propose a TMP capable of measuring the dose distribution concurrently with the protoacoustic measurement, thereby circumventing the need for MC simulations and their associated uncertainties.
Methods
Normoxic N-vinylpyrrolidone-based polymer gel dosimeters were employed as TMPs. Two gel dosimeters of varying sizes were irradiated with a 226.5 MeV proton beam from a clinical synchrocyclotron. Post-irradiation, magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the beam range within the gels. Concurrently, protoacoustic ranges were measured using an optical hydrophone, employing both a time-of-arrival (TOA) method and an acoustic simulation-based approach. The ranges obtained from the gel dosimeters were then compared with those from the protoacoustic methods.
Results
The range differences between the gel dosimeter measurements and both protoacoustic methods were within 1 mm for both gel sizes. In contrast, the maximum deviation between the protoacoustic range and the MC simulation-derived range was 2.1 mm, potentially attributable to inaccuracies in the assumed material properties within the MC simulation.
Conclusions
Polymer gel dosimeters provide a direct method for validating protoacoustic beam range measurements in clinical proton beams, circumventing the reliance on MC simulations and their associated uncertainties.
期刊介绍:
Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics:
Medical Imaging
Radiation Therapy
Radiation Protection
Measuring Systems and Signal Processing
Education and training in Medical Physics
Professional issues in Medical Physics.