医生主导的试点成瘾咨询服务的多方法评估

IF 1.9 0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Laura Rodger , Kathleen Ann Sheehan , Andrew Pinto
{"title":"医生主导的试点成瘾咨询服务的多方法评估","authors":"Laura Rodger ,&nbsp;Kathleen Ann Sheehan ,&nbsp;Andrew Pinto","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Addiction consultation services are hospital-based specialist programs designed to support the care of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). This study aimed to: (1) describe service volumes and patient demographics for a pilot addiction consultation program, (2) compare clinical outcomes between patients seen prior to and after program implementation, and (3) explore provider perceptions, referral patterns, and clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the RE-AIM framework, we conducted a formative multi-method evaluation at a tertiary care hospital. Quantitative data about the uptake of the pilot program and clinical descriptions of three patient groups (consult patients, pre-program baseline patients, post-program non-consult patients) was collected through chart review. A provider survey with closed and open-ended questions was used to explore provider practice patterns, perceived needs, roles, and challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most consult requests were from General Internal Medicine (136/181, 75.1 %). Consult orders were usually placed during service hours (169/181 93.4 %), with a median time between admission and consult request of 1 day (IQR 0–2). Consultation was linked to higher odds of receiving a pharmacotherapy prescription compared to baseline (OR 5.82 [95 % CI 3.05–11.99], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and patients not receiving consultation (OR 6.78 [95 % CI 2.76–20.75], p &lt; 0.001). Survey findings highlighted non-addiction specialist providers' lack of confidence with substance use pharmacotherapy and consultation for counselling, resource navigation, and harm reduction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The consult program demonstrated consistent uptake and was associated with increased access to pharmacotherapy for hospitalized patients, supporting improved inpatient addiction care. Non-addiction providers identified value in the consult program beyond pharmacotherapy and identified challenges with this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"178 ","pages":"Article 209795"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-method evaluation of a physician-led pilot addiction consult service\",\"authors\":\"Laura Rodger ,&nbsp;Kathleen Ann Sheehan ,&nbsp;Andrew Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Addiction consultation services are hospital-based specialist programs designed to support the care of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). This study aimed to: (1) describe service volumes and patient demographics for a pilot addiction consultation program, (2) compare clinical outcomes between patients seen prior to and after program implementation, and (3) explore provider perceptions, referral patterns, and clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the RE-AIM framework, we conducted a formative multi-method evaluation at a tertiary care hospital. Quantitative data about the uptake of the pilot program and clinical descriptions of three patient groups (consult patients, pre-program baseline patients, post-program non-consult patients) was collected through chart review. A provider survey with closed and open-ended questions was used to explore provider practice patterns, perceived needs, roles, and challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most consult requests were from General Internal Medicine (136/181, 75.1 %). Consult orders were usually placed during service hours (169/181 93.4 %), with a median time between admission and consult request of 1 day (IQR 0–2). Consultation was linked to higher odds of receiving a pharmacotherapy prescription compared to baseline (OR 5.82 [95 % CI 3.05–11.99], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and patients not receiving consultation (OR 6.78 [95 % CI 2.76–20.75], p &lt; 0.001). Survey findings highlighted non-addiction specialist providers' lack of confidence with substance use pharmacotherapy and consultation for counselling, resource navigation, and harm reduction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The consult program demonstrated consistent uptake and was associated with increased access to pharmacotherapy for hospitalized patients, supporting improved inpatient addiction care. Non-addiction providers identified value in the consult program beyond pharmacotherapy and identified challenges with this patient population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"178 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成瘾咨询服务是基于医院的专家项目,旨在支持对物质使用障碍(sud)患者的护理。本研究旨在:(1)描述一个试点成瘾咨询项目的服务量和患者人口统计数据;(2)比较项目实施前后患者的临床结果;(3)探索提供者的看法、转诊模式和临床实践。方法采用RE-AIM框架,对某三级医院进行形成性多方法评价。通过图表回顾收集了三组患者(会诊患者、会诊前基线患者、会诊后非会诊患者)对试点方案的接受情况和临床描述的定量数据。一项包含封闭式和开放式问题的提供者调查用于探索提供者实践模式、感知需求、角色和挑战。结果内科医师咨询最多(136/181,75.1%);咨询订单通常在服务时间下达(169/181 93.4%),入院和咨询请求之间的中位数时间为1天(IQR 0-2)。与基线相比,会诊与接受药物治疗处方的几率较高(OR 5.82 [95% CI 3.05-11.99], p < 0.001)和未接受会诊的患者(OR 6.78 [95% CI 2.76-20.75], p < 0.001)相关。调查结果强调,非成瘾专家提供者对药物使用药物治疗和咨询、资源导航和减少危害缺乏信心。结论:咨询项目显示出持续的吸收,并与住院患者获得药物治疗的机会增加有关,支持改善住院患者成瘾护理。非成瘾提供者确定了咨询项目在药物治疗之外的价值,并确定了这一患者群体的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-method evaluation of a physician-led pilot addiction consult service

Introduction

Addiction consultation services are hospital-based specialist programs designed to support the care of patients with substance use disorders (SUDs). This study aimed to: (1) describe service volumes and patient demographics for a pilot addiction consultation program, (2) compare clinical outcomes between patients seen prior to and after program implementation, and (3) explore provider perceptions, referral patterns, and clinical practice.

Methods

Using the RE-AIM framework, we conducted a formative multi-method evaluation at a tertiary care hospital. Quantitative data about the uptake of the pilot program and clinical descriptions of three patient groups (consult patients, pre-program baseline patients, post-program non-consult patients) was collected through chart review. A provider survey with closed and open-ended questions was used to explore provider practice patterns, perceived needs, roles, and challenges.

Results

Most consult requests were from General Internal Medicine (136/181, 75.1 %). Consult orders were usually placed during service hours (169/181 93.4 %), with a median time between admission and consult request of 1 day (IQR 0–2). Consultation was linked to higher odds of receiving a pharmacotherapy prescription compared to baseline (OR 5.82 [95 % CI 3.05–11.99], p < 0.001) and patients not receiving consultation (OR 6.78 [95 % CI 2.76–20.75], p < 0.001). Survey findings highlighted non-addiction specialist providers' lack of confidence with substance use pharmacotherapy and consultation for counselling, resource navigation, and harm reduction.

Conclusions

The consult program demonstrated consistent uptake and was associated with increased access to pharmacotherapy for hospitalized patients, supporting improved inpatient addiction care. Non-addiction providers identified value in the consult program beyond pharmacotherapy and identified challenges with this patient population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信