Je Min Suh, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Raelynn Tong, David Pilcher, Dong-Kyu Lee, Laurence Weinberg
{"title":"虚弱对老年ICU患者住院结局的影响:一项涉及8220例病例的两国多中心分析","authors":"Je Min Suh, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Raelynn Tong, David Pilcher, Dong-Kyu Lee, Laurence Weinberg","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05612-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As global populations age, the number of nonagenarians admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is rising. Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome marked by diminished physiological reserves, has been associated with adverse outcomes in older ICU patients. However, evidence remains limited regarding its prognostic significance in nonagenarians, who represent a unique and rapidly growing subset of critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on in-hospital mortality and length of stay among nonagenarian ICU patients in Australia and New Zealand. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the ANZICS Adult Patient Database, including nonagenarians admitted to 211 ICUs between 2017 and 2023 with documented Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores. Patients were classified as frail (CFS ≥ 5) or non-frail (CFS < 5). Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to adjust for confounders including age, sex, illness severity, admission type, and comorbidities. Outcomes included ICU and hospital mortality, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS). Statistical analyses included multivariable Cox regression, log-transformed logistic regression, and Fine Gray competing risks models. Among 16,439 nonagenarians, 8220 patients were propensity matched. In the matched cohort, frailty was independently associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted HR 1.352, 95% CI 1.192–1.534, p < 0.001) and ICU mortality (adjusted HR 1.242, 95% CI 1.044–1.440, p = 0.017). Each one-point increase in CFS score was associated with a 9% increase in the odds ratio of ICU mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.18, p = 0.026) and a 19% increase in the odds ratio of hospital mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10–1.28, p < 0.001). Frailty was not associated with ICU LOS after adjustment (p = 0.739) but predicted prolonged hospital LOS (adjusted β = 1.051, 95% CI 1.033–1.070, p < 0.001). Frailty is a strong, independent predictor of hospital mortality and prolonged hospitalization in critically ill nonagenarians, even after adjusting for illness severity and comorbidities. These findings support the incorporation of frailty assessment into early risk stratification and clinical decision-making in ICU settings, to facilitate goal-concordant care and optimize resource allocation for the very elderly.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes in nonagenarian ICU patients: a binational multicenter analysis of 8,220 cases\",\"authors\":\"Je Min Suh, Nattaya Raykateeraroj, Raelynn Tong, David Pilcher, Dong-Kyu Lee, Laurence Weinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13054-025-05612-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As global populations age, the number of nonagenarians admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is rising. Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome marked by diminished physiological reserves, has been associated with adverse outcomes in older ICU patients. However, evidence remains limited regarding its prognostic significance in nonagenarians, who represent a unique and rapidly growing subset of critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on in-hospital mortality and length of stay among nonagenarian ICU patients in Australia and New Zealand. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the ANZICS Adult Patient Database, including nonagenarians admitted to 211 ICUs between 2017 and 2023 with documented Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores. Patients were classified as frail (CFS ≥ 5) or non-frail (CFS < 5). Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to adjust for confounders including age, sex, illness severity, admission type, and comorbidities. Outcomes included ICU and hospital mortality, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS). Statistical analyses included multivariable Cox regression, log-transformed logistic regression, and Fine Gray competing risks models. Among 16,439 nonagenarians, 8220 patients were propensity matched. In the matched cohort, frailty was independently associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted HR 1.352, 95% CI 1.192–1.534, p < 0.001) and ICU mortality (adjusted HR 1.242, 95% CI 1.044–1.440, p = 0.017). Each one-point increase in CFS score was associated with a 9% increase in the odds ratio of ICU mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.18, p = 0.026) and a 19% increase in the odds ratio of hospital mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10–1.28, p < 0.001). Frailty was not associated with ICU LOS after adjustment (p = 0.739) but predicted prolonged hospital LOS (adjusted β = 1.051, 95% CI 1.033–1.070, p < 0.001). Frailty is a strong, independent predictor of hospital mortality and prolonged hospitalization in critically ill nonagenarians, even after adjusting for illness severity and comorbidities. These findings support the incorporation of frailty assessment into early risk stratification and clinical decision-making in ICU settings, to facilitate goal-concordant care and optimize resource allocation for the very elderly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05612-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05612-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着全球人口老龄化,入住重症监护病房(icu)的90多岁老人数量正在上升。虚弱是一种以生理储备减少为特征的多维综合征,与老年ICU患者的不良结局有关。然而,关于其在九十岁老人中的预后意义的证据仍然有限,九十岁老人是危重患者中一个独特且快速增长的子集。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚和新西兰老年ICU患者虚弱对住院死亡率和住院时间的影响。我们使用来自ANZICS成人患者数据库的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究,包括2017年至2023年间入住211个icu的老年患者,并记录了临床虚弱量表(CFS)评分。将患者分为虚弱(CFS≥5)和非虚弱(CFS < 5)。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)来调整混杂因素,包括年龄、性别、疾病严重程度、入院类型和合并症。结果包括ICU和住院死亡率,ICU和住院时间(LOS)。统计分析包括多变量Cox回归、对数变换logistic回归和Fine Gray竞争风险模型。在16439名高龄老人中,8220名患者倾向匹配。在匹配的队列中,虚弱与住院死亡率(调整后HR 1.352, 95% CI 1.192-1.534, p < 0.001)和ICU死亡率(调整后HR 1.242, 95% CI 1.044-1.440, p = 0.017)升高独立相关。CFS评分每增加1分,ICU死亡率的优势比增加9% (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18, p = 0.026),住院死亡率的优势比增加19% (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.28, p < 0.001)。调整后,虚弱与ICU LOS无相关性(p = 0.739),但预测住院LOS延长(调整后β = 1.051, 95% CI 1.033-1.070, p < 0.001)。即使在调整了疾病严重程度和合并症之后,虚弱仍然是九十多岁危重患者住院死亡率和住院时间延长的一个强有力的独立预测因子。这些发现支持将虚弱评估纳入ICU设置的早期风险分层和临床决策,以促进目标一致的护理和优化资源分配。
Impact of frailty on in-hospital outcomes in nonagenarian ICU patients: a binational multicenter analysis of 8,220 cases
As global populations age, the number of nonagenarians admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) is rising. Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome marked by diminished physiological reserves, has been associated with adverse outcomes in older ICU patients. However, evidence remains limited regarding its prognostic significance in nonagenarians, who represent a unique and rapidly growing subset of critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of frailty on in-hospital mortality and length of stay among nonagenarian ICU patients in Australia and New Zealand. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the ANZICS Adult Patient Database, including nonagenarians admitted to 211 ICUs between 2017 and 2023 with documented Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) scores. Patients were classified as frail (CFS ≥ 5) or non-frail (CFS < 5). Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to adjust for confounders including age, sex, illness severity, admission type, and comorbidities. Outcomes included ICU and hospital mortality, and ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOS). Statistical analyses included multivariable Cox regression, log-transformed logistic regression, and Fine Gray competing risks models. Among 16,439 nonagenarians, 8220 patients were propensity matched. In the matched cohort, frailty was independently associated with increased hospital mortality (adjusted HR 1.352, 95% CI 1.192–1.534, p < 0.001) and ICU mortality (adjusted HR 1.242, 95% CI 1.044–1.440, p = 0.017). Each one-point increase in CFS score was associated with a 9% increase in the odds ratio of ICU mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.18, p = 0.026) and a 19% increase in the odds ratio of hospital mortality (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10–1.28, p < 0.001). Frailty was not associated with ICU LOS after adjustment (p = 0.739) but predicted prolonged hospital LOS (adjusted β = 1.051, 95% CI 1.033–1.070, p < 0.001). Frailty is a strong, independent predictor of hospital mortality and prolonged hospitalization in critically ill nonagenarians, even after adjusting for illness severity and comorbidities. These findings support the incorporation of frailty assessment into early risk stratification and clinical decision-making in ICU settings, to facilitate goal-concordant care and optimize resource allocation for the very elderly.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.