Reshmi J. S. Patel, Chengyue Wu, Casey E. Stowers, Rania M. Mohamed, Jingfei Ma, Gaiane M. Rauch, Thomas E. Yankeelov
{"title":"基于mri的数学模型预测I-SPY 2乳腺癌患者对新辅助治疗的反应","authors":"Reshmi J. S. Patel, Chengyue Wu, Casey E. Stowers, Rania M. Mohamed, Jingfei Ma, Gaiane M. Rauch, Thomas E. Yankeelov","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We seek to establish the generalizability of our biology-based mathematical model in accurately predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Patients and Methods: 91 patients (representing three subtypes of LABC) from 10 I-SPY 2 clinical trial sites received quantitative MRI before (V1), three weeks into (V2), and after completion of (V3) the first 12-week standard-of-care or experimental NAT course. We used these data to calibrate, on a patient-specific basis, our previously developed biology-based mathematical model describing the spatiotemporal change in the number of tumor cells. After calibrating the mathematical model to the V1 and V2 MRI data, the calibrated model predicted the patient-specific tumor status at V3 by explicitly accounting for tumor cell movement (constrained by the mechanical properties of the surrounding tissue), proliferation, and death due to treatment. Results: The concordance correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted tumor change from V1 to V3 was 0.94 for total cellularity and 0.91 for volume. A logistic regression model of predicted tumor volume metrics from V1 to V3 differentiated pCR from non-pCR patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78. Conclusions: Our tumor forecasting pipeline can accurately predict tumor status after an NAT course—on a patient-specific basis, without a training dataset—using “real-world” MRI data obtained from a multi-subtype, multi-site clinical trial.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI-based mathematical modeling to predict the response of I-SPY 2 breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant therapy\",\"authors\":\"Reshmi J. S. Patel, Chengyue Wu, Casey E. Stowers, Rania M. Mohamed, Jingfei Ma, Gaiane M. Rauch, Thomas E. Yankeelov\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: We seek to establish the generalizability of our biology-based mathematical model in accurately predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Patients and Methods: 91 patients (representing three subtypes of LABC) from 10 I-SPY 2 clinical trial sites received quantitative MRI before (V1), three weeks into (V2), and after completion of (V3) the first 12-week standard-of-care or experimental NAT course. We used these data to calibrate, on a patient-specific basis, our previously developed biology-based mathematical model describing the spatiotemporal change in the number of tumor cells. After calibrating the mathematical model to the V1 and V2 MRI data, the calibrated model predicted the patient-specific tumor status at V3 by explicitly accounting for tumor cell movement (constrained by the mechanical properties of the surrounding tissue), proliferation, and death due to treatment. Results: The concordance correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted tumor change from V1 to V3 was 0.94 for total cellularity and 0.91 for volume. A logistic regression model of predicted tumor volume metrics from V1 to V3 differentiated pCR from non-pCR patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78. Conclusions: Our tumor forecasting pipeline can accurately predict tumor status after an NAT course—on a patient-specific basis, without a training dataset—using “real-world” MRI data obtained from a multi-subtype, multi-site clinical trial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0668\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-0668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRI-based mathematical modeling to predict the response of I-SPY 2 breast cancer patients to neoadjuvant therapy
Purpose: We seek to establish the generalizability of our biology-based mathematical model in accurately predicting the response of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Patients and Methods: 91 patients (representing three subtypes of LABC) from 10 I-SPY 2 clinical trial sites received quantitative MRI before (V1), three weeks into (V2), and after completion of (V3) the first 12-week standard-of-care or experimental NAT course. We used these data to calibrate, on a patient-specific basis, our previously developed biology-based mathematical model describing the spatiotemporal change in the number of tumor cells. After calibrating the mathematical model to the V1 and V2 MRI data, the calibrated model predicted the patient-specific tumor status at V3 by explicitly accounting for tumor cell movement (constrained by the mechanical properties of the surrounding tissue), proliferation, and death due to treatment. Results: The concordance correlation coefficient between the observed and predicted tumor change from V1 to V3 was 0.94 for total cellularity and 0.91 for volume. A logistic regression model of predicted tumor volume metrics from V1 to V3 differentiated pCR from non-pCR patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78. Conclusions: Our tumor forecasting pipeline can accurately predict tumor status after an NAT course—on a patient-specific basis, without a training dataset—using “real-world” MRI data obtained from a multi-subtype, multi-site clinical trial.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.