公共资源管理、道德与经济发展:以蒙古牧场管理为例

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shunji Oniki, Kadirbyek Dagys, Go Sakamoto
{"title":"公共资源管理、道德与经济发展:以蒙古牧场管理为例","authors":"Shunji Oniki,&nbsp;Kadirbyek Dagys,&nbsp;Go Sakamoto","doi":"10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mongolian pastoralists have social norms for using different pastures in different seasons, which contributes to the sustainable utilization of grasslands. However, as the economy develops, individuals’ morals may change, such that the social norms for the use of grassland resources may not be maintained. This study explores how economic development in Mongolia relates to pastoralists’ moral judgments and how it relates to the social norms regarding the use of communal grasslands. We collected data from 480 households in four areas close to an urban area where the market economy is more developed and in four remote areas of Mongolia. Using these data, we estimated econometric models showing the factors affecting moral judgments and their effects on social norms. The results show that better access to urban areas is associated with more consequentialist and libertarian herders and less deontology and communitarian herders and consequentialist and libertarian morals are negatively associated with social norms for grassland use. These results suggest that as market economies penetrate rural areas, people’s morality changes, and social norms based on traditional communal cohesion and mutual aid will be less likely to be maintained. These findings suggest that policymakers should apply intervention methods acceptable to libertarians and consequentialists, who are increasing with economic development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 3","pages":"1739 - 1756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communal resource management, morality, and economic development: a case of pastureland management in Mongolia\",\"authors\":\"Shunji Oniki,&nbsp;Kadirbyek Dagys,&nbsp;Go Sakamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Mongolian pastoralists have social norms for using different pastures in different seasons, which contributes to the sustainable utilization of grasslands. However, as the economy develops, individuals’ morals may change, such that the social norms for the use of grassland resources may not be maintained. This study explores how economic development in Mongolia relates to pastoralists’ moral judgments and how it relates to the social norms regarding the use of communal grasslands. We collected data from 480 households in four areas close to an urban area where the market economy is more developed and in four remote areas of Mongolia. Using these data, we estimated econometric models showing the factors affecting moral judgments and their effects on social norms. The results show that better access to urban areas is associated with more consequentialist and libertarian herders and less deontology and communitarian herders and consequentialist and libertarian morals are negatively associated with social norms for grassland use. These results suggest that as market economies penetrate rural areas, people’s morality changes, and social norms based on traditional communal cohesion and mutual aid will be less likely to be maintained. These findings suggest that policymakers should apply intervention methods acceptable to libertarians and consequentialists, who are increasing with economic development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"1739 - 1756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10722-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒙古族牧民在不同季节使用不同草场具有社会规范,有利于草原的可持续利用。然而,随着经济的发展,个人的道德观念可能会发生变化,从而可能无法维持草原资源利用的社会规范。本研究探讨了蒙古的经济发展与牧民道德判断的关系,以及与公共草原使用的社会规范的关系。我们收集了来自四个靠近市场经济较发达的城市地区和蒙古四个偏远地区的480户家庭的数据。利用这些数据,我们估计了显示影响道德判断的因素及其对社会规范的影响的计量经济模型。结果表明,较易进入城市地区,结果主义和自由意志主义牧民数量增加,义务主义和社群主义牧民数量减少,结果主义和自由意志主义道德与草原使用社会规范呈负相关。这些结果表明,随着市场经济渗透到农村地区,人们的道德观念发生了变化,基于传统社区凝聚力和互助的社会规范将不太可能维持下去。这些发现表明,政策制定者应该采用随经济发展而增加的自由意志主义者和结果主义者所接受的干预方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communal resource management, morality, and economic development: a case of pastureland management in Mongolia

Mongolian pastoralists have social norms for using different pastures in different seasons, which contributes to the sustainable utilization of grasslands. However, as the economy develops, individuals’ morals may change, such that the social norms for the use of grassland resources may not be maintained. This study explores how economic development in Mongolia relates to pastoralists’ moral judgments and how it relates to the social norms regarding the use of communal grasslands. We collected data from 480 households in four areas close to an urban area where the market economy is more developed and in four remote areas of Mongolia. Using these data, we estimated econometric models showing the factors affecting moral judgments and their effects on social norms. The results show that better access to urban areas is associated with more consequentialist and libertarian herders and less deontology and communitarian herders and consequentialist and libertarian morals are negatively associated with social norms for grassland use. These results suggest that as market economies penetrate rural areas, people’s morality changes, and social norms based on traditional communal cohesion and mutual aid will be less likely to be maintained. These findings suggest that policymakers should apply intervention methods acceptable to libertarians and consequentialists, who are increasing with economic development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信