追逐生猪,追逐利润:挪威有机和自由放养生猪的地域性

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tommy Ruud, Richard Helliwell
{"title":"追逐生猪,追逐利润:挪威有机和自由放养生猪的地域性","authors":"Tommy Ruud,&nbsp;Richard Helliwell","doi":"10.1007/s10460-025-10741-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Organic and free-range pig farming offers a potential solution to multiple agricultural challenges, including high pesticide and antimicrobial use, excess fertilization, biodiversity loss, and animal suffering. Organic pig production, which includes outdoor access and rearing, has been one solution promoted by the European Union. This study, based on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with organic and non-organic free-range pig farmers in Norway, suggests that while promising, sustaining these production systems faces challenges related to animal welfare, land management, and market dynamics for pork. Specifically, we note how the weak symbolic value of organic labels and principles for pigs and pork results in fragile markets, whilst pigs’ rooting undermines not just soil and farm boundaries, but potentially their own welfare. Farmers have responded by forming new relational arrangements, including situating pigs as a working animal contributing to the broader productivity of the farm, and decommodifying pigs and pork in favour of using them to sustain broader social relations that produce other values and opportunities. We conclude that the flexibility and adaptability of pigs opens multiple trajectories of change, with regards to market organization, farmer collaboration and breeding pigs for rearing outdoors. If Europe is to reterritorialize the pig and pork industry around alternative production methods it requires a fundamental reimagining of the socio-material relations underpinning this industry, its moral frameworks and our relationship with pigs and pork.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":"42 3","pages":"1881 - 1894"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-025-10741-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chasing pigs, chasing profits: (De)territorializing organic and free-range pig farming in Norway\",\"authors\":\"Tommy Ruud,&nbsp;Richard Helliwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10460-025-10741-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Organic and free-range pig farming offers a potential solution to multiple agricultural challenges, including high pesticide and antimicrobial use, excess fertilization, biodiversity loss, and animal suffering. Organic pig production, which includes outdoor access and rearing, has been one solution promoted by the European Union. This study, based on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with organic and non-organic free-range pig farmers in Norway, suggests that while promising, sustaining these production systems faces challenges related to animal welfare, land management, and market dynamics for pork. Specifically, we note how the weak symbolic value of organic labels and principles for pigs and pork results in fragile markets, whilst pigs’ rooting undermines not just soil and farm boundaries, but potentially their own welfare. Farmers have responded by forming new relational arrangements, including situating pigs as a working animal contributing to the broader productivity of the farm, and decommodifying pigs and pork in favour of using them to sustain broader social relations that produce other values and opportunities. We conclude that the flexibility and adaptability of pigs opens multiple trajectories of change, with regards to market organization, farmer collaboration and breeding pigs for rearing outdoors. If Europe is to reterritorialize the pig and pork industry around alternative production methods it requires a fundamental reimagining of the socio-material relations underpinning this industry, its moral frameworks and our relationship with pigs and pork.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"1881 - 1894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-025-10741-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Human Values\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10741-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-025-10741-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有机和散养养猪为解决多种农业挑战提供了潜在的解决方案,包括农药和抗菌素的大量使用、过度施肥、生物多样性丧失和动物痛苦。有机生猪生产,包括户外通道和饲养,是欧盟推广的一种解决方案。本研究基于对挪威有机和非有机散养养猪农户的人种学田野调查和访谈,研究表明,尽管前景光明,但维持这些生产系统面临着与动物福利、土地管理和猪肉市场动态相关的挑战。具体来说,我们注意到有机标签和猪和猪肉原则的微弱象征价值如何导致脆弱的市场,而猪的扎根不仅破坏了土壤和农场边界,而且潜在地破坏了他们自己的福利。农民的反应是形成新的关系安排,包括将猪作为一种工作动物,为农场更广泛的生产力做出贡献,并将猪和猪肉去改造,以便利用它们维持更广泛的社会关系,从而产生其他价值和机会。我们得出结论,猪的灵活性和适应性在市场组织、农民合作和种猪户外饲养方面开启了多种变化轨迹。如果欧洲要围绕替代生产方法重新界定猪和猪肉产业,就需要从根本上重新构想支撑该产业的社会物质关系、道德框架以及我们与猪和猪肉的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chasing pigs, chasing profits: (De)territorializing organic and free-range pig farming in Norway

Organic and free-range pig farming offers a potential solution to multiple agricultural challenges, including high pesticide and antimicrobial use, excess fertilization, biodiversity loss, and animal suffering. Organic pig production, which includes outdoor access and rearing, has been one solution promoted by the European Union. This study, based on ethnographic fieldwork and interviews with organic and non-organic free-range pig farmers in Norway, suggests that while promising, sustaining these production systems faces challenges related to animal welfare, land management, and market dynamics for pork. Specifically, we note how the weak symbolic value of organic labels and principles for pigs and pork results in fragile markets, whilst pigs’ rooting undermines not just soil and farm boundaries, but potentially their own welfare. Farmers have responded by forming new relational arrangements, including situating pigs as a working animal contributing to the broader productivity of the farm, and decommodifying pigs and pork in favour of using them to sustain broader social relations that produce other values and opportunities. We conclude that the flexibility and adaptability of pigs opens multiple trajectories of change, with regards to market organization, farmer collaboration and breeding pigs for rearing outdoors. If Europe is to reterritorialize the pig and pork industry around alternative production methods it requires a fundamental reimagining of the socio-material relations underpinning this industry, its moral frameworks and our relationship with pigs and pork.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信