以奥沙利铂为基础的方案治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌:高反应患者的特征

F. Salvà , G. Catani , N. Saoudi , I. Baraibar , J. Ros , M. Rodriguez , C. Salvà de Torres , A. Alcaraz , A. Garcia , R. Comas , F. Ruiz-Pace , A. Rezqallah , R. Dienstmann , J. Tabernero , E. Elez
{"title":"以奥沙利铂为基础的方案治疗难治性转移性结直肠癌:高反应患者的特征","authors":"F. Salvà ,&nbsp;G. Catani ,&nbsp;N. Saoudi ,&nbsp;I. Baraibar ,&nbsp;J. Ros ,&nbsp;M. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;C. Salvà de Torres ,&nbsp;A. Alcaraz ,&nbsp;A. Garcia ,&nbsp;R. Comas ,&nbsp;F. Ruiz-Pace ,&nbsp;A. Rezqallah ,&nbsp;R. Dienstmann ,&nbsp;J. Tabernero ,&nbsp;E. Elez","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Oxaliplatin, a key agent used for managing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is often discontinued due to cumulative toxicity. Its reintroduction in later treatment lines remains a common clinical practice, despite the absence of robust prospective trials supporting this therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin rechallenge in refractory mCRC and to identify patient characteristics predictive of improved outcomes with this approach.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with oxaliplatin in the third- or fourth-line setting at Vall d’Hebron Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median progression-free survival (PFS). Patients achieving median PFS &gt;6 months were classified as best-responders. Factors affecting PFS were analyzed with a Cox regression model. Amplicon-seq analysis of 61 genes was carried out using Illumina technology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 735 patients receiving third- or fourth-line treatment, 102 (14%) received oxaliplatin retreatment (69% in third line; 31% in fourth line). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.29-5.03 months), with an ORR of 12% and DCR of 39%. Twenty-eight patients (27%) were best-responders. Predictors of efficacy included response to first-line oxaliplatin, planned oxaliplatin discontinuation, and an oxaliplatin-free interval of at least 22.0 months. No significant associations were identified between molecular alterations and prognostic subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Oxaliplatin-based reintroduction therapy is a viable strategy in mCRC, particularly for patients with a favorable prior response and prolonged oxaliplatin-free intervals. However, identifying more precise biomarkers is essential to improve patient selection and maximize treatment efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retreatment with oxaliplatin-based regimens in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: characterization of high-response patients\",\"authors\":\"F. Salvà ,&nbsp;G. Catani ,&nbsp;N. Saoudi ,&nbsp;I. Baraibar ,&nbsp;J. Ros ,&nbsp;M. Rodriguez ,&nbsp;C. Salvà de Torres ,&nbsp;A. Alcaraz ,&nbsp;A. Garcia ,&nbsp;R. Comas ,&nbsp;F. Ruiz-Pace ,&nbsp;A. Rezqallah ,&nbsp;R. Dienstmann ,&nbsp;J. Tabernero ,&nbsp;E. Elez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Oxaliplatin, a key agent used for managing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is often discontinued due to cumulative toxicity. Its reintroduction in later treatment lines remains a common clinical practice, despite the absence of robust prospective trials supporting this therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin rechallenge in refractory mCRC and to identify patient characteristics predictive of improved outcomes with this approach.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with oxaliplatin in the third- or fourth-line setting at Vall d’Hebron Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median progression-free survival (PFS). Patients achieving median PFS &gt;6 months were classified as best-responders. Factors affecting PFS were analyzed with a Cox regression model. Amplicon-seq analysis of 61 genes was carried out using Illumina technology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 735 patients receiving third- or fourth-line treatment, 102 (14%) received oxaliplatin retreatment (69% in third line; 31% in fourth line). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.29-5.03 months), with an ORR of 12% and DCR of 39%. Twenty-eight patients (27%) were best-responders. Predictors of efficacy included response to first-line oxaliplatin, planned oxaliplatin discontinuation, and an oxaliplatin-free interval of at least 22.0 months. No significant associations were identified between molecular alterations and prognostic subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Oxaliplatin-based reintroduction therapy is a viable strategy in mCRC, particularly for patients with a favorable prior response and prolonged oxaliplatin-free intervals. However, identifying more precise biomarkers is essential to improve patient selection and maximize treatment efficacy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819825000998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819825000998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多沙利铂是治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的关键药物,由于累积毒性经常被停药。尽管缺乏强有力的前瞻性试验支持这种治疗策略,但在后期治疗中重新引入它仍然是一种常见的临床实践。本研究旨在评估奥沙利铂再挑战在难治性mCRC中的疗效,并确定预测该方法改善预后的患者特征。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年至2021年间在Vall d 'Hebron医院接受奥沙利铂治疗的三线或四线患者。结果包括总缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和中位无进展生存期(PFS)。中位PFS达到6个月的患者被归类为最佳应答者。采用Cox回归模型分析影响PFS的因素。利用Illumina技术对61个基因进行扩增子序列分析。结果735例接受三线或四线治疗的患者中,102例(14%)接受奥沙利铂再治疗(三线69%,四线31%)。中位PFS为4.0个月(95% CI 3.29-5.03个月),ORR为12%,DCR为39%。28名患者(27%)是最佳应答者。疗效的预测指标包括对一线奥沙利铂的反应,计划停用奥沙利铂,以及至少22.0个月的无奥沙利铂间隔。未发现分子改变与预后亚组之间存在显著关联。结论以索沙利铂为基础的再引入治疗是治疗mCRC的一种可行策略,特别是对于既往疗效良好且无奥沙利铂治疗间隔延长的患者。然而,确定更精确的生物标志物对于改善患者选择和最大化治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retreatment with oxaliplatin-based regimens in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: characterization of high-response patients

Background

Oxaliplatin, a key agent used for managing metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), is often discontinued due to cumulative toxicity. Its reintroduction in later treatment lines remains a common clinical practice, despite the absence of robust prospective trials supporting this therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin rechallenge in refractory mCRC and to identify patient characteristics predictive of improved outcomes with this approach.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with oxaliplatin in the third- or fourth-line setting at Vall d’Hebron Hospital between 2015 and 2021. Outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and median progression-free survival (PFS). Patients achieving median PFS >6 months were classified as best-responders. Factors affecting PFS were analyzed with a Cox regression model. Amplicon-seq analysis of 61 genes was carried out using Illumina technology.

Results

Of 735 patients receiving third- or fourth-line treatment, 102 (14%) received oxaliplatin retreatment (69% in third line; 31% in fourth line). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.29-5.03 months), with an ORR of 12% and DCR of 39%. Twenty-eight patients (27%) were best-responders. Predictors of efficacy included response to first-line oxaliplatin, planned oxaliplatin discontinuation, and an oxaliplatin-free interval of at least 22.0 months. No significant associations were identified between molecular alterations and prognostic subgroups.

Conclusions

Oxaliplatin-based reintroduction therapy is a viable strategy in mCRC, particularly for patients with a favorable prior response and prolonged oxaliplatin-free intervals. However, identifying more precise biomarkers is essential to improve patient selection and maximize treatment efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信