基于相机的野外测量估算植被覆盖度的自动化方法:ExG (SATE)的饱和度自适应阈值

IF 12.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Xuemiao Ye , Wenquan Zhu , Ruoyang Liu , Bangke He , Xinyi Yang , Cenliang Zhao
{"title":"基于相机的野外测量估算植被覆盖度的自动化方法:ExG (SATE)的饱和度自适应阈值","authors":"Xuemiao Ye ,&nbsp;Wenquan Zhu ,&nbsp;Ruoyang Liu ,&nbsp;Bangke He ,&nbsp;Xinyi Yang ,&nbsp;Cenliang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is a crucial metric for assessing vegetation cover on the Earth’s surface. The excess green index (ExG), derived from visible true-color RGB images, is widely recognized as a reliable metric for identifying green vegetation. However, the threshold to distinguish vegetation from background via ExG is highly sensitive to variations in illumination, limiting its robustness in real-world applications. Traditional thresholding methods, such as the bimodal thresholding method, maximum entropy thresholding method, and Otsu’s method, perform well under uniform illumination conditions but often fail to achieve high vegetation identification accuracy in scenarios with uneven illumination. Previous studies have shown that saturation (S) is strongly correlated with illumination intensity and can serve as an effective indicator of illumination variations. Specifically, under strong illumination conditions, both vegetation and non-vegetation appear more vivid, resulting in higher S values. For vegetation, the green-band digital number (DN) value increases more sharply than that of the red and blue bands, resulting in a notable rise in ExG. In comparison, non-vegetation like soil shows only a slight green-band increase, producing a smaller ExG gain. This contrast in ExG between the two surfaces becomes more distinct, so a higher segmentation threshold is required. Conversely, weak illumination conditions lead to lower S values and more uniform DN reductions across surface types, which diminishes ExG contrast and necessitates a lower threshold. Building upon this insight, this study introduced a novel method for automated vegetation coverage extraction: the saturation-adaptive threshold for ExG (SATE). SATE dynamically determines the optimal segmentation threshold for ExG on a pixel-by-pixel basis on the S value, then identifies vegetation pixels by comparing the ExG value of each pixel with its corresponding threshold, and finally calculates the FVC, thereby enhancing the adaptability to diverse illumination conditions. To validate its effectiveness, SATE was tested using 100 high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) red‒green-blue (RGB) images collected from five diverse regions across China, covering a range of illumination conditions, vegetation types, and complex land cover scenarios. The experimental results demonstrated that SATE can effectively address the challenges posed by uneven illumination, achieving an average vegetation recognition accuracy of 91–94 %. For vegetation identification, the performance of SATE combined with ExG surpassed that of traditional thresholding methods, including the bimodal thresholding method (86.4 %), maximum entropy thresholding method (67.0 %), and Otsu’s method (66.5 %). Moreover, SATE combined with ExG achieved an accuracy comparable to that of the manual thresholding method (95 %) while eliminating the need for subjective intervention, thus enhancing the automation and practical applicability. In addition, SATE outperformed other local adaptive thresholding methods, including Sauvola (65.3 %), Niblack (58.7 %), OpenCV mean (56.7 %), and OpenCV Gaussian (55.6 %), achieving a higher and more stable accuracy (94.1 %) under varying conditions. Under changing illumination conditions, SATE exhibited superior performance in terms of automation, stability, and applicability, making it a highly efficient and easily deployable solution for automated FVC estimation in camera-based field measurements, particularly in complex land-cover scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50269,"journal":{"name":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","volume":"229 ","pages":"Pages 170-187"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An automated method for estimating fractional vegetation cover from camera-based field measurements: Saturation-adaptive threshold for ExG (SATE)\",\"authors\":\"Xuemiao Ye ,&nbsp;Wenquan Zhu ,&nbsp;Ruoyang Liu ,&nbsp;Bangke He ,&nbsp;Xinyi Yang ,&nbsp;Cenliang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is a crucial metric for assessing vegetation cover on the Earth’s surface. The excess green index (ExG), derived from visible true-color RGB images, is widely recognized as a reliable metric for identifying green vegetation. However, the threshold to distinguish vegetation from background via ExG is highly sensitive to variations in illumination, limiting its robustness in real-world applications. Traditional thresholding methods, such as the bimodal thresholding method, maximum entropy thresholding method, and Otsu’s method, perform well under uniform illumination conditions but often fail to achieve high vegetation identification accuracy in scenarios with uneven illumination. Previous studies have shown that saturation (S) is strongly correlated with illumination intensity and can serve as an effective indicator of illumination variations. Specifically, under strong illumination conditions, both vegetation and non-vegetation appear more vivid, resulting in higher S values. For vegetation, the green-band digital number (DN) value increases more sharply than that of the red and blue bands, resulting in a notable rise in ExG. In comparison, non-vegetation like soil shows only a slight green-band increase, producing a smaller ExG gain. This contrast in ExG between the two surfaces becomes more distinct, so a higher segmentation threshold is required. Conversely, weak illumination conditions lead to lower S values and more uniform DN reductions across surface types, which diminishes ExG contrast and necessitates a lower threshold. Building upon this insight, this study introduced a novel method for automated vegetation coverage extraction: the saturation-adaptive threshold for ExG (SATE). SATE dynamically determines the optimal segmentation threshold for ExG on a pixel-by-pixel basis on the S value, then identifies vegetation pixels by comparing the ExG value of each pixel with its corresponding threshold, and finally calculates the FVC, thereby enhancing the adaptability to diverse illumination conditions. To validate its effectiveness, SATE was tested using 100 high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) red‒green-blue (RGB) images collected from five diverse regions across China, covering a range of illumination conditions, vegetation types, and complex land cover scenarios. The experimental results demonstrated that SATE can effectively address the challenges posed by uneven illumination, achieving an average vegetation recognition accuracy of 91–94 %. For vegetation identification, the performance of SATE combined with ExG surpassed that of traditional thresholding methods, including the bimodal thresholding method (86.4 %), maximum entropy thresholding method (67.0 %), and Otsu’s method (66.5 %). Moreover, SATE combined with ExG achieved an accuracy comparable to that of the manual thresholding method (95 %) while eliminating the need for subjective intervention, thus enhancing the automation and practical applicability. In addition, SATE outperformed other local adaptive thresholding methods, including Sauvola (65.3 %), Niblack (58.7 %), OpenCV mean (56.7 %), and OpenCV Gaussian (55.6 %), achieving a higher and more stable accuracy (94.1 %) under varying conditions. Under changing illumination conditions, SATE exhibited superior performance in terms of automation, stability, and applicability, making it a highly efficient and easily deployable solution for automated FVC estimation in camera-based field measurements, particularly in complex land-cover scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 170-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271625003284\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271625003284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植被覆盖度(FVC)是评价地球表面植被覆盖度的重要指标。过量绿色指数(ExG)来源于可见的真彩色RGB图像,被广泛认为是识别绿色植被的可靠指标。然而,通过ExG区分植被和背景的阈值对光照变化高度敏感,限制了其在实际应用中的鲁棒性。传统的阈值方法,如双峰阈值法、最大熵阈值法和Otsu方法,在均匀光照条件下表现良好,但在光照不均匀的情况下往往无法达到较高的植被识别精度。已有研究表明,饱和度(S)与光照强度密切相关,可以作为光照变化的有效指标。具体来说,在强光照条件下,植被和非植被都显得更加鲜明,S值也更高。对植被而言,绿带数字数(DN)值比红带和蓝带增加得更快,导致ExG显著上升。相比之下,非植被类土壤只有轻微的绿带增加,产生较小的egg增益。在ExG中,两个表面之间的对比变得更加明显,因此需要更高的分割阈值。相反,弱光照条件导致不同表面类型的S值更低,DN降低更均匀,这降低了ExG对比度,需要更低的阈值。在此基础上,本研究引入了一种新的自动植被覆盖度提取方法:饱和度自适应阈值ExG (SATE)。SATE基于S值逐像素动态确定ExG的最优分割阈值,然后通过比较每个像素的ExG值与其对应的阈值来识别植被像素,最后计算植被覆盖度,从而增强对不同光照条件的适应性。为了验证其有效性,使用从中国五个不同地区收集的100张高分辨率无人机(UAV)红绿蓝(RGB)图像对SATE进行了测试,涵盖了一系列照明条件、植被类型和复杂的土地覆盖场景。实验结果表明,SATE可以有效地解决光照不均匀带来的挑战,平均植被识别精度达到91 - 94%。在植被识别方面,SATE结合ExG的性能优于传统的阈值方法,包括双峰阈值法(86.4%)、最大熵阈值法(67.0%)和Otsu法(66.5%)。此外,SATE与ExG相结合,达到了与人工阈值法相当的准确率(95%),同时消除了主观干预的需要,从而增强了自动化和实用性。此外,SATE优于其他局部自适应阈值分割方法,包括Sauvola (65.3%), Niblack (58.7%), OpenCV mean(56.7%)和OpenCV Gaussian(55.6%),在不同条件下获得更高且更稳定的准确率(94.1%)。在不断变化的光照条件下,SATE在自动化、稳定性和适用性方面表现出优异的性能,使其成为基于相机的野外测量中自动化植被覆盖度估计的高效且易于部署的解决方案,特别是在复杂的土地覆盖场景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An automated method for estimating fractional vegetation cover from camera-based field measurements: Saturation-adaptive threshold for ExG (SATE)
Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is a crucial metric for assessing vegetation cover on the Earth’s surface. The excess green index (ExG), derived from visible true-color RGB images, is widely recognized as a reliable metric for identifying green vegetation. However, the threshold to distinguish vegetation from background via ExG is highly sensitive to variations in illumination, limiting its robustness in real-world applications. Traditional thresholding methods, such as the bimodal thresholding method, maximum entropy thresholding method, and Otsu’s method, perform well under uniform illumination conditions but often fail to achieve high vegetation identification accuracy in scenarios with uneven illumination. Previous studies have shown that saturation (S) is strongly correlated with illumination intensity and can serve as an effective indicator of illumination variations. Specifically, under strong illumination conditions, both vegetation and non-vegetation appear more vivid, resulting in higher S values. For vegetation, the green-band digital number (DN) value increases more sharply than that of the red and blue bands, resulting in a notable rise in ExG. In comparison, non-vegetation like soil shows only a slight green-band increase, producing a smaller ExG gain. This contrast in ExG between the two surfaces becomes more distinct, so a higher segmentation threshold is required. Conversely, weak illumination conditions lead to lower S values and more uniform DN reductions across surface types, which diminishes ExG contrast and necessitates a lower threshold. Building upon this insight, this study introduced a novel method for automated vegetation coverage extraction: the saturation-adaptive threshold for ExG (SATE). SATE dynamically determines the optimal segmentation threshold for ExG on a pixel-by-pixel basis on the S value, then identifies vegetation pixels by comparing the ExG value of each pixel with its corresponding threshold, and finally calculates the FVC, thereby enhancing the adaptability to diverse illumination conditions. To validate its effectiveness, SATE was tested using 100 high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) red‒green-blue (RGB) images collected from five diverse regions across China, covering a range of illumination conditions, vegetation types, and complex land cover scenarios. The experimental results demonstrated that SATE can effectively address the challenges posed by uneven illumination, achieving an average vegetation recognition accuracy of 91–94 %. For vegetation identification, the performance of SATE combined with ExG surpassed that of traditional thresholding methods, including the bimodal thresholding method (86.4 %), maximum entropy thresholding method (67.0 %), and Otsu’s method (66.5 %). Moreover, SATE combined with ExG achieved an accuracy comparable to that of the manual thresholding method (95 %) while eliminating the need for subjective intervention, thus enhancing the automation and practical applicability. In addition, SATE outperformed other local adaptive thresholding methods, including Sauvola (65.3 %), Niblack (58.7 %), OpenCV mean (56.7 %), and OpenCV Gaussian (55.6 %), achieving a higher and more stable accuracy (94.1 %) under varying conditions. Under changing illumination conditions, SATE exhibited superior performance in terms of automation, stability, and applicability, making it a highly efficient and easily deployable solution for automated FVC estimation in camera-based field measurements, particularly in complex land-cover scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 工程技术-成像科学与照相技术
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (P&RS) serves as the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). It acts as a platform for scientists and professionals worldwide who are involved in various disciplines that utilize photogrammetry, remote sensing, spatial information systems, computer vision, and related fields. The journal aims to facilitate communication and dissemination of advancements in these disciplines, while also acting as a comprehensive source of reference and archive. P&RS endeavors to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed research papers that are preferably original and have not been published before. These papers can cover scientific/research, technological development, or application/practical aspects. Additionally, the journal welcomes papers that are based on presentations from ISPRS meetings, as long as they are considered significant contributions to the aforementioned fields. In particular, P&RS encourages the submission of papers that are of broad scientific interest, showcase innovative applications (especially in emerging fields), have an interdisciplinary focus, discuss topics that have received limited attention in P&RS or related journals, or explore new directions in scientific or professional realms. It is preferred that theoretical papers include practical applications, while papers focusing on systems and applications should include a theoretical background.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信